On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:10 AM, John Conover wrote:
>
> Anytime mailx is envoked, it does a core dump:
>
> mail: mu_wordsplit failed: missing closing quote
> Segmentation fault
>
> Any suggestions?
>
It would be nice to document the problem first with full
Anytime mailx is envoked, it does a core dump:
mail: mu_wordsplit failed: missing closing quote
Segmentation fault
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
John
--
John Conover, cono...@rahul.net, http://www.johncon.com/
Hi
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 03:18:54PM +0100, Julien Groselle wrote:
> Hello Debian users,
>
> I want enable core dump on a debian squeeze server.
> So I have downloaded the source code of kernel (2.6.32) and i have activate
> this options :
>
> CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE=
Hello Debian users,
I want enable core dump on a debian squeeze server.
So I have downloaded the source code of kernel (2.6.32) and i have activate
this options :
CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE=y
CONFIG_KEXEC=y
CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y
CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP=y
Compilation was successful, but i can&#
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Avinash H.M. wrote:
> Thanks !!! this worked.
> I did
> ulimit -c unlimited.
>
> I tried tracking ulimit. If i do
> which ulimit, i am not getting anything. [ I expect the path of this binary
> ]
>
> Is it a built in bash command or something like that
>
Ye
Chris Bannister earthlight.co.nz> writes:
>
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 10:40:53PM +0530, Avinash H.M. wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am using DSL [ damn small linux ] which is branched from debain.
> > I am trying to use GCC, GDB. Able to install both of them.
>
> Although DSL is based on Debian
h -g, then take a look at man core. Not
>> every program that has received
>> a segfault signal dumps core. Look at gcore to see how to generate it.
>>
>>
>> --
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a
>> subject of "un
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 10:40:53PM +0530, Avinash H.M. wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using DSL [ damn small linux ] which is branched from debain.
> I am trying to use GCC, GDB. Able to install both of them.
Although DSL is based on Debian, it is not Debian. There are numerous
differences between th
dumps core. Look at gcore to see how to generate it.
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a
> subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bf81657.7060...@gmail.com
>
>
Normally core dump is disabled. You could find the maximum size of core
file created using "ulimit -a", normally that is 0.
Increase it using
ulimit -c
On 05/22/2010 08:10 PM, Avinash H.M. wrote:
Hi All,
I am using DSL [ damn small linux ] which is branched from debain.
I am trying to use GCC, GDB. Able to install both of them.
I am doing following
- run a helloworld.c program whic has a while loop. So while
running, its stuck in while
Hi All,
I am using DSL [ damn small linux ] which is branched from debain.
I am trying to use GCC, GDB. Able to install both of them.
I am doing following
- run a helloworld.c program whic has a while loop. So while
running, its stuck in while.
- another shell, "kill -11 PID" [ PID of
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 21:08 -0300, Carlos Alberto Pereira Gomes wrote:
> I use wine in a debian/sid machine but in the last 2-3 weeks (after some
> apt-get updade/upgrade) it just does not run any application it used to
> run without problems.
A good start could be to file a bug report and see if
Hi,
I use wine in a debian/sid machine but in the last 2-3 weeks (after some
apt-get updade/upgrade) it just does not run any application it used to
run without problems. Following is its core dump:
wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x7d481a6c at address 0xb7dc1141
(thread 0009
on Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 08:39:53PM -0400, Gregory Seidman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:34:59AM +0200, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> } I just got home a couple of hours ago, and when I logged in and started
> } mucking around I noticed a 36MB binary file called core.11377 with
an unstripped binary and
use it, and wait for the next crash.
Since a full backtrace with debugging information is a beautiful thing
to have, we're planning to make packages that contain detached debugging
information. Then if you got a crash or core dump, you could run gdb
with this and get
--- Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> } any strange behavior. How do I find out what process was 11377, and how
> } do I examine the contents of the file?
>
> file core.11377
>
> You examine the contents with gdb.
>
> } -Roberto
> --Greg
Cool. Here is what it said:
$file core
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:34:59AM +0200, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
} I just got home a couple of hours ago, and when I logged in and started
} mucking around I noticed a 36MB binary file called core.11377 with a time
} stamp of about seven hours ago. I was home at lunch and working on the
} computer
I just got home a couple of hours ago, and when I logged in and started mucking
around I noticed a 36MB binary file called core.11377 with a time stamp of
about
seven hours ago. I was home at lunch and working on the computer, so it is
possible that it occured then, but I don't remember any strang
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 06:18:46PM +0200, Robert Epprecht wrote:
| Sorry for the very basic question:
|
| To adapt a program to Debian the author needs a core dump.
| He says the program *will* crash on Debian when started.
| But since I switched to Debian I didn't see any crashes :-)
> To adapt a program to Debian the author needs a core dump.
> He says the program *will* crash on Debian when started.
> But since I switched to Debian I didn't see any crashes :-)
>
> Is core dumping enabled by default on potato, and where
> can I configure that?
the c
Sorry for the very basic question:
To adapt a program to Debian the author needs a core dump.
He says the program *will* crash on Debian when started.
But since I switched to Debian I didn't see any crashes :-)
Is core dumping enabled by default on potato, and where
can I configure that?
Sven Burgener wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Some questions to be answered:
>
> o How, if possible, can I deliberately cause a core dump on Linux?
> (Running potato / 2.2.17-pre6-1 kernel from the sources available
> in potato.)
Program core dump or kernel
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 09:24:27PM +0200, Sven Burgener wrote:
> that the *actualy 2.2.17 is out? (Currently -pre6-1)
s/*actualy/actual/
:-P
Hello
Some questions to be answered:
o How, if possible, can I deliberately cause a core dump on Linux?
(Running potato / 2.2.17-pre6-1 kernel from the sources available
in potato.)
o Will the 2.2.17 sources for potato be updated anytime soon, now
that the
Neil Booth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have found a bug in some software that causes it to segfault.
> However, there is no core file to use with gdb. Why is a core file
> not generated / how do I force one?
Programs can prevent themselves from dumping core -- if they do, then
there's nothing
ulimit -c unlimited
On Sat, Oct 16, 1999 at 16:15, Neil Booth wrote:
> I have found a bug in some software that causes it to segfault.
> However, there is no core file to use with gdb. Why is a core file
> not generated / how do I force one?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Neil.
--
Zimmermann semtex Shell
I have found a bug in some software that causes it to segfault.
However, there is no core file to use with gdb. Why is a core file
not generated / how do I force one?
Thanks,
Neil.
Each time I run netscape 4.5, talkback dumps core. Here is the backtrace
when I ran gdb on the core file.
Core was generated by `/usr/local/netscape-4.5/talkback/talkback -nub'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Erreur de segmentation.
#0 0x0 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0 in ?? ()
#1 0x4017ee9e in
On Thu, Jun 17, 1999 at 01:22:28AM +1000, Shao Zhang wrote:
> On some unix machines, when it seg faults, the compiler
> will say something segmentation fault(core dumped). Then the
> compiler will write a file core in the current dir.
> On my linux machine, when it segment
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Shao Zhang wrote:
> On some unix machines, when it seg faults, the compiler
> will say something segmentation fault(core dumped). Then the
> compiler will write a file core in the current dir.
I noticed this thread a few days ago. I thought of something then
Hi,
Thx for the reply. Maybe I am not clear myself.
On some unix machines, when it seg faults, the compiler
will say something segmentation fault(core dumped). Then the
compiler will write a file core in the current dir.
On my linux machine, when it segment
On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 05:35:56AM +1000, Shao Zhang wrote:
> How do I configure the g++ compiler to dump a core when it
> segment faults.
I guess you're looking at the command to enable any segmentation faults. Under
bash, the command to use is `ulimit', try `man ulimit' to see the va
Hi,
How do I configure the g++ compiler to dump a core when it
segment faults.
Thanks.
shao.
--
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1 ___ _ _
Department of Communications/ __| |_
nd tell you the
state of the program when it dumped core. Install the gdb package and
do a "man gdb".
Using a debugger like this allows you to show where the program dumped
core and you can examine variables/memory at the time of the core
dump. Of course if the program that dumped core w
Dear all,
I understand that it should be possible to feed core to an editor
that will clear it up (remove lines of nulls for example), and will show
the hex characters and ascii equivalents. In addition the c compiler
should I think be able to produce a memory map as well, in order to make
tation fault.
#0 0x400516c3 in ?? ()
A simple recompilation probably is not enough. I believe the core dump
is caused by writing or reading past the end of some array/string so
the bug might seem to go away with a recompilation but would come back.
I have:
- a recent hamm
tation fault.
#0 0x400516c3 in ?? ()
A simple recompilation probably is not enough. I believe the core dump
is caused by writing or reading past the end of some array/string so
the bug might seem to go away with a recompilation but would come back.
I have:
- a recent hamm
Alan Su wrote:
> Steven Morrill wrote (Sat, 24 Jan 1998 19:01:09 -0800 ):
> |>Hello all,
> |>
> |>I have a couple of questions... What is it exactly a "core dump"?
> |>And what should I do if I have one? Is there a certain cleanup or repair
> |>
On Sat, 24 Jan 1998, Steven Morrill wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a couple of questions... What is it exactly a "core dump"?
> And what should I do if I have one? Is there a certain cleanup or repair
> process I need to go thru?
A core dump is caused when t
Hello all,
I have a couple of questions... What is it exactly a "core dump"?
And what should I do if I have one? Is there a certain cleanup or repair
process I need to go thru?
TIA
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL P
Emacs booted up after I downgraded xlib6-3.3-5 (in hamm) to xlib6-3.3-3 (in
bo).
I didn't have to touch xlib6g.
I am unfamiliar with the use of strace, but when I tried it, the core dump
occured as a SIGSEGV, right after getting the PID.
Apparently emacs_19 has to be recompiled for th
d can be used to send the core output to
/dev/null? I've not heard of this so maybe someone with knowledge of core
dumps can tell us if redirecting (2>,>) will redirect a core dump? I
would be interested in knowing myself.
On Sun, 11 May 1997, G. Kapetanios wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
On Sun, 11 May 1997, G. Kapetanios wrote:
> [...deleted...]
> However, the core dumps are large since the workfile of the program
> is dumped ( around 60 Mb ). Getting the commercial company to do
> something about this didn't achieve much. So I would like to know if
> there is away to disable cor
Hi,
I have a commercial package for statistics installed on my debian system.
This is primarily for interactive use but because my programs take a long
time I run it using the nohup command in the background. The problem is
that after the program finishes its calculations and before it exits it
d
>
> > Are you sure gs dumps core or do you merely get regular gs error
> > messages (which usually almost look like a core dump) ?
>
> I (think I) heard somewhere that problems with gs giving
> errors (illegal operations and so forth) are due to a bug in gcc
> when
> Are you sure gs dumps core or do you merely get regular gs error
> messages (which usually almost look like a core dump) ?
I (think I) heard somewhere that problems with gs giving
errors (illegal operations and so forth) are due to a bug in gcc
when gs is compiled with certain optimis
>
> > When I try 'gs -anitialias *.ps' it gives me a core dump. I
> > have gs-aladdin_4.03-2_i386.deb
>
> Are you sure gs dumps core or do you merely get regular gs error
> messages (which usually almost look like a core dump) ?
>
> Also, since gs d
> When I try 'gs -anitialias *.ps' it gives me a core dump. I
> have gs-aladdin_4.03-2_i386.deb
Are you sure gs dumps core or do you merely get regular gs error
messages (which usually almost look like a core dump) ?
Also, since gs does not know the option "-antialias&
David Puryear wrote:
> I noticed that some ps files gives error when using
> gv -antialias
> Does anyone know why? I looked at man and docs and couldn't not find
> why.
Okay, I play around with it some more. It's not gv problem but
ghostscript. When I try 'gs -anitiali
49 matches
Mail list logo
