On Fri, 18 May 2001 18:49:48 -0500
Balbir Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using kernel 2.2.19 and with debian 2.2r2 and keep getting the
> following
> message at boot up :
>
> Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
> /lib/modules/2.2.19/modules.dep
>
> I read the earlier pos
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 01:14:14AM +0100, Gordon Hart wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 06:49:48PM -0500, Balbir Thomas wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am using kernel 2.2.19 and with debian 2.2r2 and keep getting the
> > following
> > message at boot up :
> >
> > Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 06:49:48PM -0500, Balbir Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using kernel 2.2.19 and with debian 2.2r2 and keep getting the following
> message at boot up :
>
> Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/2.2.19/modules.dep
>
> I read the earlier post in this mailing
Hi,
I am using kernel 2.2.19 and with debian 2.2r2 and keep getting the following
message at boot up :
Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/2.2.19/modules.dep
I read the earlier post in this mailing list saying it was a bug in 2.2.17 . So
I upgraded to 2.2.19 and it still hap
"David Z. Maze" wrote:
>
> Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> KW> Is there a plain-english ("for dummies") page somewhere that
> KW> explains how modules work (modutils vs /etc/modules vs kmod vs
> KW> kerneld vs conf.modules vs modules.conf
Quoting Kent West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> However, I don't have an "/etc/conf.modules" file on my system. I do
> have an "/etc/conf.modules.old" and an "/etc/modules.conf". So my basic
> question still stands. Which file is to be used? The documentatio
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KW> Is there a plain-english ("for dummies") page somewhere that
KW> explains how modules work (modutils vs /etc/modules vs kmod vs
KW> kerneld vs conf.modules vs modules.conf vs /etc/modutils/ vs auto
KW> vs specific items in /
>
> Can I delete my "/etc/conf.modules.old" file without worry?
>
yep, i have not had one for some time. There is no standard as of yet. When
the LSB (Linux Standards Base) gets ratified we may have to revisit this issue.
If documentation confuses you, please mail the maintainer and ask for t
vs
> > /etc/modules vs kmod vs kerneld vs conf.modules vs modules.conf vs
> > /etc/modutils/ vs auto vs specific items in /etc/modules vs compile-in
> > vs Godzilla vs Buck Rogers in the 23rd Century)?
> >
>
> update-modules is the key component. Documentation for Debian and
> Can anyone verify that this is the case? Add any info? Which should I
> use on my system? Do I have a choice? Is there a plain-english ("for
> dummies") page somewhere that explains how modules work (modutils vs
> /etc/modules vs kmod vs kerneld vs conf.modules vs modules.c
Okay, I'm been looking off-and-on for weeks, and in earnest for the past
hour, and maybe I'm just blind and/or stupid, but I can not find an
explanation of the difference between conf.modules and modules.conf.
I think maybe that conf.modules is the official name (according to some
Linux
Hi there,
does anybody know if there is a example file which includes all possible
modules? I include one that I have found on a SuSE-Distribution.
Uwe#
# Copyright (c) 1996-1999 SuSE GmbH Nuernberg, Germany. All rights reserved.
#
# Author: Hubert Mantel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 1996-1999
#
# Confi
Hi,
I am tring to get midi working with my SB32 PNP.
In my conf.modules, I have a line:
post-install awe_wave /usr/bin/sfxload /usr/lib/awe/sfbank/synthgm.sbk
But, when kernel boots up, it said failed.
I've checked the /lib/modules, and it has awe_wave.o
After my last message i've just found i've omit to add the alias section
read in AX25-HOWTO in my conf.modules.
now my conf.modules is :
# We could start with a keep statement in here, but since we use a
different
# order for the module path's we just override the whole thing.
#
14 matches
Mail list logo
