> I have an installation in which the linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64
> package is "stuck" in aptitude at 2.6.26-25lenny1. There's a
> -26lenny1 security release that my other installations are seeing.
> "apt-get {update,upgrade}" doesn't change anything.
The apt cache is on an NFS mount. I moved
Is there a way to empty the cache of known packages, to reload it from
the repositories? Like, if I renamed /var/lib/dpkg/available. Is
that safe?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> 1. you did not run 'apt-get update'
No, did that. I keep doing that, in the hope of hitting a different
server in the security pool. And tcpdump tells me I do.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> Unless these boxes are on different continents, why not just copy over the
>> sources.list from one to the other and go from there?
>
> Because if my reading of the diff is correct (and was not trimmed of
> other relevant differences) the two sources.list files are identi
On Lu, 06 dec 10, 03:06:02, shawn wilson wrote:
> Unless these boxes are on different continents, why not just copy over the
> sources.list from one to the other and go from there?
Because if my reading of the diff is correct (and was not trimmed of
other relevant differences) the two sources.lis
Unless these boxes are on different continents, why not just copy over the
sources.list from one to the other and go from there?
On Du, 05 dec 10, 23:39:02, Mike wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > Compare the output of 'apt-cache policy' on the different systems.
>
> 1st is good system, 2nd is bad one. Interesting. What does it mean?
>
> *** 20,31
>release v=5.0,o=Debian,a=stable,l=Debian-Security,c=main
>
Tom H wrote:
> Or "apt-get -s dist-upgrade" to check whether dist-upgrade would pull it in.
No difference with "-s".
> Also, check the output of "apt-cache policy linux-image-..."
It tells me that installed == candidate on the respective systems.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ..
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Compare the output of 'apt-cache policy' on the different systems.
1st is good system, 2nd is bad one. Interesting. What does it mean?
*** 20,31
release v=5.0,o=Debian,a=stable,l=Debian-Security,c=main
origin security.debian.org
500 http://ftp.us.de
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:06 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Mike wrote:
>>
>> I have in installation in which the linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64
>> package is "stuck" in aptitude at 2.6.26-25lenny1. There's a
>> -26lenny1 security release that my other installations are
shawn wilson wrote:
>> I have in installation in which the linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64
>> package is "stuck" in aptitude at 2.6.26-25lenny1. There's a
>> -26lenny1 security release that my other installations are seeing. It
>> has no hold on it. Security is in sources.list.
>> "apt-get {updat
On Du, 05 dec 10, 22:30:08, Mike wrote:
> I have in installation in which the linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64
> package is "stuck" in aptitude at 2.6.26-25lenny1. There's a
> -26lenny1 security release that my other installations are seeing. It
> has no hold on it. Security is in sources.list.
>
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Mike wrote:
> I have in installation in which the linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64
> package is "stuck" in aptitude at 2.6.26-25lenny1. There's a
> -26lenny1 security release that my other installations are seeing. It
> has no hold on it. Security is in sources.li
I have in installation in which the linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64
package is "stuck" in aptitude at 2.6.26-25lenny1. There's a
-26lenny1 security release that my other installations are seeing. It
has no hold on it. Security is in sources.list.
"apt-get {update,upgrade}" doesn't change anything
14 matches
Mail list logo
