Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Compare the output of 'apt-cache policy' on the different systems.
1st is good system, 2nd is bad one. Interesting. What does it mean?
*** 20,31 ****
release v=5.0,o=Debian,a=stable,l=Debian-Security,c=main
origin security.debian.org
500 http://ftp.us.debian.org lenny/contrib Packages
! release v=5.0.7,o=Debian,a=stable,l=Debian,c=contrib
origin ftp.us.debian.org
500 http://ftp.us.debian.org lenny/non-free Packages
! release v=5.0.7,o=Debian,a=stable,l=Debian,c=non-free
origin ftp.us.debian.org
500 http://ftp.us.debian.org lenny/main Packages
! release v=5.0.7,o=Debian,a=stable,l=Debian,c=main
origin ftp.us.debian.org
Pinned packages:
--- 20,31 ----
release v=5.0,o=Debian,a=stable,l=Debian-Security,c=main
origin security.debian.org
500 http://ftp.us.debian.org lenny/contrib Packages
! release v=5.0.6,o=Debian,a=stable,l=Debian,c=contrib
origin ftp.us.debian.org
500 http://ftp.us.debian.org lenny/non-free Packages
! release v=5.0.6,o=Debian,a=stable,l=Debian,c=non-free
origin ftp.us.debian.org
500 http://ftp.us.debian.org lenny/main Packages
! release v=5.0.6,o=Debian,a=stable,l=Debian,c=main
origin ftp.us.debian.org
Pinned packages:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20101206073902.gb30...@adsl-64-142-29-25.sonic.net
