Hi,
It seems /usr/lib/pm-utils/power.d/95hdparm-apm script from the hdparm
package may be called when AC power adapter is plugged or unplugged
(true/false arguments). I see that this script is invoked by
/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hdparm.rules through /lib/udev/hdparm on boot or
resume.
What
On Thu, 05 May 2011 05:10:53 -0700, Regid Ichira wrote:
> $ apt-cache --names-only search apm | grep sleepd
> sleepd - puts an inactive or low battery laptop to sleep
>
> Am I right that, according to man apt-cache, mentioning sleepd is a bug?
(...)
Yep, well... kind of. Alre
$ apt-cache --names-only search apm | grep sleepd
sleepd - puts an inactive or low battery laptop to sleep
Am I right that, according to man apt-cache, mentioning sleepd is a bug?
$ man apt-cache | grep -A20 ' search regex' | head
search reg
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:53:19 -0500 (EST), Camaleón wrote:
>
> There is a FAQ about that in ThinkWiki, but almost sure you already saw
> it :-)
>
> How to make APM work
> http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/How_to_make_APM_work
>
> My suggestion? Just test suspension/hi
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:53:28 -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
(...)
> Just
> keep in mind that it is part of the problem definition that I *must* run
> APM and I *cannot* run ACPI. What should I do? Where should I look?
> Any suggestions?
There is a FAQ about that in ThinkWiki, but
I have an IBM ThinkPad 600 laptop which runs Debian Lenny. For a number of
reasons, including getting the internal Mwave ACP modem to work, I have
to disable ACPI. So I use the kernel boot parameter acpi=off and I load
the apm module via listing it in /etc/modules. A file in /etc/modprobe.d
Just been chaseing up some post install loose ends, one of which was
getting the 'automatic power off on halt' to work...
The steps required turned out to be:
a. apt-get install apm
b. echo apm >>/etc/modules
c. echo 'options apm power_off=1' >/etc/modprobe.d/apm
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:13:29 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:23 -0800, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> >
> > I am confused as to what power management technology I should be using.
> > When I installed debian etch on this po
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:23 -0800, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
>
> I am confused as to what power management technology I should be using. When
> I installed debian etch on this powerpc Apple PowerBook, apm was used as
> default.
>
> Things are working great here and I
Hey guys,
I am confused as to what power management technology I should be using. When I
installed debian etch on this powerpc Apple PowerBook, apm was used as default.
Things are working great here and I have no complaints. However, I understand
there is also ACPI, which is newer.
Are there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there a way to get battery status for a laptop/notebook computer
without using APM or ACPI?
I actually have both installed, but neither have kernel support.
However, running GKrellM earlier it showed battery status. It seemed to
be accurate. When
[This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.]
I had sarge on a Compaq Armada 3500 notebook. No ACPI,
but APM suspend to disk was working with an upstream
kernel with APM compiled in.
Fresh etch install on the same system, 2.6.17-2-686.
modprobe apm gives
apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags
6-2) config to get only that?
Having the apm module should be enough (unless you want to use ACPI).
You might have to modprobe it manually or add it to /etc/modules. If
your power-off does not work, check with "lsmod | grep apm" if the
module is really loaded.
If it does not work even with
off
> the power on shutdown/halt. What are the minimum options I have to set
> in the kernel (2.6.16-2) config to get only that?
Having the apm module should be enough (unless you want to use ACPI).
You might have to modprobe it manually or add it to /etc/modules. If
your power-off does not work,
Hi,
there are lots of options related to power management in the kernel
config, some/most/all of them seem the be mostly useful for laptops.
The only power management feature I would like to have is turning off
the power on shutdown/halt. What are the minimum options I have to set
in the kernel (
I wonder if someone has seen this and knows how to solve it. I've been breaking
my head against this problem for a fortnight without success.
I have an updated sid system, kernel 2.6.14-2-686, installed on a Fujitsu
Lifebook E342 laptop. Its BIOS only has APM support. I discovered that AC
Hi,
I'm lost trying to enable APM on a Debian stock kernel 2.6.14-2-686. Would
anybody know of some document that talks about this ? I've tried booting the
kernel with acpi=off apm=on, but APM is not enabled. It works with
2.6.8-2-686. I've googled around but didn't hit a
Hi,
Would anybody know how to enable APM on a 2.6.14-2-686 kernel ?
After I upgraded my kernel to 2.6.14-2-686, I noticed I couldn't suspend my
laptop. It's an old Fujitsu Lifebook E342, with APM.
These messages come from dmesg:
apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x03 (Driver version 1
Dear colleges,
I have been trying to do APM turn the power off after shutdown with no
success.
Does anybody knows what I have to do ?
APM stops everything on my notebook but it remains "on", so that it is
necessary press and hold the power button for 3 or 4 seconds to turn it off.
B
Sorted. it was xorg. Changed back to xfree and all works sweetly.
Really annoying untracable bug though. Still, happy that it works now.
bye.
(hope this thread of use to someone adn I'm not just emailing myself!!)
rich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Sorted. it was xorg. Changed back to xfree and all works sweetly.
Really annoying untracable bug though. Still, happy that it works now.
bye.
(hope this thread of use to someone adn I'm not just emailing myself!!)
rich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
nel module that's causing the hang. Is this
analysis sensible?
any help much appreciated..
rich
On Tuesday 4 October 2005 10:48, rich lott wrote:
Hi
I don't know what caused it, but my laptop won't come out of APM suspend.
The laptop is a Dell Lattitude C640, running Etch
Hi
I don't know what caused it, but my laptop won't come out of APM suspend.
The laptop is a Dell Lattitude C640, running Etch, with the 2.6.12 kernel. The
grub menu tells the kernel to not use ACPI (it doesn't work with bios), and
apm --suspend works fine. But when I open th
Hi there,
so one more problem with the new 2.6.11 kernel, moving up from 2.4.25. Every
time I execute a bash command as a normal user, I get the message "No APM
support in kernel" . It's not fatal or anything, but it's annoying. I'm not
sure where it comes from -- t
As many of you might have read with both 2.6.9 and 2.6.10 kernels and
APM, my Thinkpad T40 (2373-92G) did not resume after being left in
suspend to RAM for a longish time (very approx. over 45 min).
Shorter sleeps went just fine and the machine restarted just perfectly
with it's bril
Hi. I am a debian newbie. I did an install of debian sarge and I am getting
kernel errors. They say:
apm: BIOS not found
APIC: error on CPU0: 60(60)
There are many of the first error and an occasional second one.
I was not exactly clear about what apm and acpi are. I am not even sure that I
hello,
i have a gateway SOLO 5350 and am trying to get it to sleep/suspend.
using :
$ apm -s
it actually does sleep, but i cannot get it to come back.
i am currently running a custom compiled 2.6.7 kernel.
relevant section of my .config file:
# APM (Advanced Power Management) BIOS Support
Hello I have a Laptop IBM T23 all works fine but I can't suspend it
and the battery indicator doesn't get updated
any clue ?
Thank you
Leonel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I meant to send this to the laptop mailing list. Sorry!
> Hello:
>
> I'm running sarge on a gateway M305 and installed apm/apmd. But 1) the
> battery status applet still says "no battery present", 2) the laptop
> seems to be running hotter than it did before, and
Hello:
I'm running sarge on a gateway M305 and installed apm/apmd. But 1) the
battery status applet still says "no battery present", 2) the laptop
seems to be running hotter than it did before, and 3) when I try to
suspend (as root) the screen will blank and then return. The error
to insert
>
> exec ('apm -s');
>
> into a Perl script.
>
> Now you know why apm needs root. :)
>
Well, what about chmod 0660 /dev/apm_bios; groudadd apm and chowm
root.apm /dev/apm_bios? Only users in group apm would then be able to
suspend. Would be a clean solut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Ivo Marino wrote:
> anyway I think apm -s should also work without being root or using sudo
> for as-root execution, this is at least what happens on PowerPC
> machines with pmud (Similar to apmd for x86) installed: An
Lance Hoffmeyer([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I get this message every time I switch from X
> to the console. What do I need to do so that
> I don't this this message?
>
> $ apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x
> apm: disabled - APM is not SMP safe.e/2004-
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 17:40, Loki wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Use sudo, combined with a script that runs apm -s.
>
> [snip]
>
Thanks for your feedback, Loki.
sudo seems to be an interesting solutions, anyway I think apm -s should
also work without being root or using sudo for as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Ivo Marino wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Each time I try to suspend my x86 `sid` workstation as a non-root user
> via the command apm -s I receive this error message:
>
> apm: Operation not permitted
> Any
Hello folks,
Each time I try to suspend my x86 `sid` workstation as a non-root user
via the command apm -s I receive this error message:
apm: Operation not permitted
Permissions on /dev/apm_bios are crw-rw-rw- (0666).
Any suggestions on how to fix this?
Maybe chmod +s /usr/bin/apm
I get this message every time I switch from X
to the console. What do I need to do so that
I don't this this message?
$ apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x
apm: disabled - APM is not SMP safe.e/2004-08-23
Lance
--
Lance Hoff
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 02:17, John Summerfield wrote:
> I don't believe that's anything to do with apm. More like DPMS, not a
> kernel function.
Ah. console-tools package may be the culprit.
Thanks,
--
Bob Bernstein
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Bob Bernstein wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 07:37:22AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
What evidence do you have that apm is on?
After a long enough period of inactivity, the monitor goes into
its power saving mode, or whatever that's called.
I don't believe that's anyt
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 07:37:22AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> What evidence do you have that apm is on?
After a long enough period of inactivity, the monitor goes into
its power saving mode, or whatever that's called.
--
Bob Bernstein
"...the language of the wind
.
HOW DO I TURN OFF APM?
Sorry. I got carried away. I've never had an install that
defaulted to apm=on. I tried in lilo.conf 'append "apm=off"' but
that didn't work, and I really didn't expect it to work cuz that's
a 2.2 kernel ploy is it not?
signed,
Perplexed in
I have done a new install of unstable using the latest
debian-installer floppies (good work Men of Debian!!). Suitably
enough the kernel-image noted in the Subject: line was chosen by
the installer for this old K6-233 box I use for things like
playing with debian-installer.
HOW DO I TURN OFF APM
Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are as many opinions on this list on ways to do things are there
> are options ;)
>
> However, FWIW I would recommend installing aptitude and apt-listbugs to
> maintain your sid system. It takes a while to get used to aptitude's
> interface (pa
e could have changed that would
cause apm to stop working?
There were some other mysteries after the upgrade which may or may not
be related to the apm problem:
- Before the upgrade, I was using OSS sound drivers the i810_audio
module. After the upgrade, something is causing the ALSA modules to
be
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Whenever APM puts my computer in supend or standby mode, the monitor
> will come out of any power saving mode that is in and it will not
> suspend, standby or go off after that. What could be the cause of this?
Is this in X11 or at the console, or both?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Whenever APM puts my computer in supend or standby mode, the monitor
> will come out of any power saving mode that is in and it will not
> suspend, standby or go off after that. What could be the cause of this?
Is this in X11 or at the console, or both?
Whenever APM puts my computer in supend or standby mode, the monitor
will come out of any power saving mode that is in and it will not
suspend, standby or go off after that. What could be the cause of this?
Before I compiled APM-support into the kernel, the APM BIOS would still
work automatically
I'm using the stock kernel-image-2.6.6-i686 and my desktop is unable to
use either APM or ACPI, both of which are built-in.
BIOS has power-saving turned on, with the timer set to 30 minutes. When
booting the stock kernel, I get a message that my BIOS is from before
1999 and I cannot use
Incoming from Luis Finotti:
>
> I did not quite follow your suggestion, though. It
> seems that I can't/shouldn't change the
> kernel-image-2.4.18-k7 manually, and even if I could
> do it, I would not know exactly how to change it...
No, you shouldn't. You should see from that config how that k
--- Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You must also, in addition to modifying the kernel
> command line, insert the apm module.
>
> # echo "apm" >>/etc/modules
>
> -Roberto
Great, Roberto! That just did the trick! Thanks.
Also, than
off the power.
After I little research, it seems that I need to
recompile the kernel with APM support. (I tried
adding "append="apm=on"" to lilo.conf, but it did not
work.)
Can any one tell me how do I do that, or give me some
reference?
You must also, in addition to modifying the
all kernel-image-2.4.18-k7" way.)
> The old kernel did turn off the power.
>
> After I little research, it seems that I need to
> recompile the kernel with APM support. (I tried
> adding "append="apm=on"" to lilo.conf, but it did not
> work.)
>
> Can a
> The old kernel did turn off the power.
The config file for that kernel will be /boot/config-2.4.18-k7 and you
can "grep APM /boot/config-..."
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling
- -
--
To
little research, it seems that I need to
recompile the kernel with APM support. (I tried
adding "append="apm=on"" to lilo.conf, but it did not
work.)
Can any one tell me how do I do that, or give me some
reference?
I&
Hi Zhaojun,
On 10.04.2004 04:17, Zhaojun Wu wrote:
I met this error message a few days ago when I updated my kernel to
version 2.6.4 and replaced the APM with ACPI. Because I didn't have
enough time to learn how to make ACPI running as expected, I installed
the "sleepd" program o
Hello Christian,
Friday, April 9, 2004, 9:16:20 PM, you wrote:
Christian Riedel> Hi,
> FATAL: error inserting apm
> (/lib/modules/2.6.4-1-k7/kernel/arch/i386/kernel/apm.ko): No such device
> The weird thing is, that I don't use apm. ACPI is detected at boot time
> a
Hi,
ich have the problem that whenever I switch from console to X, there is
an error message printed on tty1:
FATAL: error inserting apm
(/lib/modules/2.6.4-1-k7/kernel/arch/i386/kernel/apm.ko): No such device
The weird thing is, that I don't use apm. ACPI is detected at boot time
and
> I attempted to search the Debian bugs database for this,
> and maybe enter this as a bug (with fix), but couldn't get
> it to recognize the package name.
The on_ac_power script is in the powermgmt-base package.
The bug you found has already been fixed in the latest version
(1.17) of powermgmt-ba
on_ac_power script is
unable to determine the power status, so anacron assumes the worst and
assumes that the computer is on batteries, so does not start anacron!
I use APM, not ACPI, since my machine's BIOS is "from 2000 and too old".
The on_ac_power script attempts to parse /proc
kernel source and run make
xconfig (or whatever means) in the Processor Type and Features section
the option for smp is enabled by default. You should select N here if
you have single processors. The help file provided states that with this
option selected the apm module will be disabled by
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:02:39AM +, J.S.Sahambi wrote:
> I just installed the Debian unstable on a P-IV. To power off the system
> when I give it a shuddown we have to load the apm module with option
> "power_off=1". So I give the following commnad:
hm. at me loading t
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:02:39AM +, J.S.Sahambi wrote:
> I just installed the Debian unstable on a P-IV. To power off the system
You probably want to use ACPI. Odds are, depending on the manufacturer
of your hardware, that the APM support is broken, if present at all.
E.g. my D
I just installed the Debian unstable on a P-IV. To power off the system
when I give it a shuddown we have to load the apm module with option
"power_off=1". So I give the following commnad:
debain:~# modprobe apm power_off=1
I get the following text on the terminal:
/lib/modules/2.
have.
Now The new kernel fixed the problem with the pcmcia (don't need the
fix I
used with 2.4.18bf) but now the apm doesn't power down the laptop with
shutdown. I've done quite a bit of digging and have found that at
sometime
the apm module in the kernels no longer powers down m
the pcmcia (don't need the fix I
used with 2.4.18bf) but now the apm doesn't power down the laptop with
shutdown. I've done quite a bit of digging and have found that at sometime
the apm module in the kernels no longer powers down machines as a feature.
And I've looked at both th
need the fix I
used with 2.4.18bf) but now the apm doesn't power down the laptop with
shutdown. I've done quite a bit of digging and have found that at sometime
the apm module in the kernels no longer powers down machines as a feature.
And I've looked at both the bf24 kernel config
hell". Screen dimming would be nice.
Do I want to use ACPI or APM?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy Neillans wrote:
( Re-submitted - last copy did not appear - sent 18th at 2:20PM)
Hi,
I have just installed Debian R3.0 onto a newish laptop (Packard Bell iGo
6000, which is a rebranded NEC Versa M300).
If I enable APM, and cat /proc/apm I get a complete melt down - the screen
fills with
( Re-submitted - last copy did not appear - sent 18th at 2:20PM)
> Hi,
>
> I have just installed Debian R3.0 onto a newish laptop (Packard Bell iGo
> 6000, which is a rebranded NEC Versa M300).
>
> If I enable APM, and cat /proc/apm I get a complete melt down - the screen
Hi,
I have just installed Debian R3.0 onto a newish laptop (Packard Bell iGo
6000, which is a rebranded NEC Versa M300).
If I enable APM, and cat /proc/apm I get a complete melt down - the screen
fills with what appears to be registers, and it just loops and loops and
loops ...
I get the same
Hi, I'd like to be able to walk away from the machine for an hour
or so without logging or powering off. Is there a 'hibernation'
state I can use in unstable ? M$ has it via button on many of its
keyboards.
Adam Bogacki,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
El lunes, 8 de septiembre de 2003, a las 16:04, Jason Chambers escribe:
> ACPI is the newer technology and can do more than APM. However it is still
> experimental, especially in 2.4 kernels. The Debian kernels don't
> include the later ACPI patch which can improve matters. Em
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:55:59PM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> El lunes, 8 de septiembre de 2003, a las 13:51, Jason Chambers escribe:
> > "If both ACPI and Advanced Power Management (APM) support are
> >configured, whichever is loaded first shall be used.&qu
El lunes, 8 de septiembre de 2003, a las 13:51, Jason Chambers escribe:
> "If both ACPI and Advanced Power Management (APM) support are
>configured, whichever is loaded first shall be used."
I suspected this. Which option do you think is better? I am supposing
that is ACPI,
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 06:19:55PM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if I can use simultaneously apmd (with APM support enabled in
> my kernel) and acpid (with ACPI support enabled in my kernel), and
> whether this is useful, or ACPI superseedes APM in an
Hi,
I wonder if I can use simultaneously apmd (with APM support enabled in
my kernel) and acpid (with ACPI support enabled in my kernel), and
whether this is useful, or ACPI superseedes APM in any way.
Any feedback will be very useful for me, so thanks in advance.
Regards, Ismael
--
"
As the subject says: When APM is compiled into the kernel (2.4.21), then
my system (Debian 3.0 on a ASUS A7N266-VM motherboard) hangs at boot after
printing out "Starting /usr/bin/dhttpd...".
Does anybody know what one thing has to do with
), but the
"modprobe apm..." line was commented out from /etc/modules.
OK, after booting into Gnome, lsmod confirms that the apm module isn't
loaded, so it's safe to out again. Next I shut down gdm
and X, by doing this:
$ su
# /etc/init.d/gdm stop
Next, I verified that X and gdm wer
.
One of the nice things that Knoppix does is to turn the computer right
off when you shut down Linux. My wife wanted this functionality, so I
thought I had better start brushing up on apm.
I added the required line:
append="apm=on apm=power-off"
... in etc/lilo.conf, and ran lilo OK
Quoting James Strandboge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 11:57, M. Kirchhoff wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I recently picked up a second-hand laptop (IBM Thinkpad 570). I installed
> Woody
> > per the usual and found that APM seemed to w
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 11:57, M. Kirchhoff wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I recently picked up a second-hand laptop (IBM Thinkpad 570). I installed Woody
> per the usual and found that APM seemed to work fine for putting the laptop to
> sleep. However, when issuing the "halt" c
Hello All,
I recently picked up a second-hand laptop (IBM Thinkpad 570). I installed Woody
per the usual and found that APM seemed to work fine for putting the laptop to
sleep. However, when issuing the "halt" command to shut the system down, it
would only go as far as saying "P
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Daymien wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > i complete my instalation of debian linux.
> > i will use my old celeron pc at server for all pc in the house.
> > For remote control i use ssh if apm works i tray to install a x-server and
> > contr
Try 'insmod apm'. If the module loads then your shutdown/reboot should
work with no problems.
Good Luck!
--
Joao Pedro Clemente
jpcl @ rnl.ist.utl.pt
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Daymien wrote:
> Hi
>
> i complete my in
Hi
i complete my instalation of debian linux.
i will use my old celeron pc at server for all pc in the house.
For remote control i use ssh if apm works i tray to install a x-server and
controll the pc over vnc but at the moment if i shuting down the pc will
stop at "you can push off b
nate wrote:
Tom Allison said:
I have an IBM A21m, if it matters.
I have a thinkpad T20, and suspend works fine on it with both
network and power connected.
Not sure how your trying to suspend(I haven't read the thread), but
what I do is su to root and issue a apm -s
I use the bu
* Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-19 03:32]:
>
> I have an IBM A21m, if it matters.
>
I run an IBM T-600X. Once I read in an announcement by IBM the
mentioned situation was the case for not goind to suspend. Ever since
then, I unplug AC and it has been working fine that way...
wbr,
L
Tom Allison said:
> I have an IBM A21m, if it matters.
I have a thinkpad T20, and suspend works fine on it with both
network and power connected.
Not sure how your trying to suspend(I haven't read the thread), but
what I do is su to root and issue a apm -s
works everytime, and resume w
Lukas Ruf wrote:
* Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-18 12:29]:
But it doesn't seem to work as well as it should.
my IBM laptop goes to sleep if either the power plug or the network
card are removed. If both are connected, it doesn't suspend.
wbr,
Lukas
Yes!
If I pull the power o
> * Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-18 12:29]:
>>
>> But it doesn't seem to work as well as it should.
>>
>
> my IBM laptop goes to sleep if either the power plug or the network
> card are removed. If both are connected, it doesn't suspend.
>
oh...
I'll have to try that.
Maybe I need t
* Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-18 12:29]:
>
> But it doesn't seem to work as well as it should.
>
my IBM laptop goes to sleep if either the power plug or the network
card are removed. If both are connected, it doesn't suspend.
wbr,
Lukas
--
Lukas Ruf
http://www.lpr.ch
Wanna know a
I must have been struggling with this for months.
I have a pcmcia wireless nic running a DHCP connection.
I have removed the 'auto' entries in /etc/network/interfaces and have only
the network.opts to load the network configuration when I install the card.
I have that apm thingy f
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:18:00PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Thanks for your reply:
>
> since I have remove the `Batterie Charge Monitor' applet
> (Gnome2 under testing/unstable) the Linux clock is fine.
>
> Is there a link between this applet (APM) and the Linux
Thanks for your reply:
since I have remove the `Batterie Charge Monitor' applet
(Gnome2 under testing/unstable) the Linux clock is fine.
Is there a link between this aapplet (APM) and the Linux clock ?
Thanks,
Jerome
Jan Trippler wrote:
On Son, 16 Feb 2003 at 15:05 (+0200), Jerome B
Short version:
I'm trying to get xlock to automatically launch whenever my machine
(a laptop) goes into suspend mode.
Slightly longer version:
I've been using a symlink in /etc/apm/suspend.d (to a script in
/etc/apm/scripts.d) to handle the starting and stoppin
-- nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Saturday, 01 February 2003, 12:17 PM -0800):
> Matthew Weier OPhinney said:
> > I've got debian testing on my wife's old p-120 laptop; it works great, and
> > with the plethora of text tools I typically use, it's much more productive
> > than windows ever was o
Matthew Weier OPhinney said:
> I've got debian testing on my wife's old p-120 laptop; it works great, and
> with the plethora of text tools I typically use, it's much more productive
> than windows ever was on it.
>
> However, I've noticed some odd behaviour in relation to suspending while a
> vim
I've got debian testing on my wife's old p-120 laptop; it works great,
and with the plethora of text tools I typically use, it's much more
productive than windows ever was on it.
However, I've noticed some odd behaviour in relation to suspending while
a vim session is open: in a nutshell, when I t
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:14:36PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 19:13, Pigeon wrote:
> > And don't forget that the power isn't REALLY turned off, and you
> > therefore have to switch it off at the wall. Or you could do what I
> > did, and take the PSU apart to wire in the do
On Tuesday 17 December 2002 17:10, Clive Standbridge wrote:
> On Mon 16 Dec 2002 18:34:27 +(+), daves debian wrote:
> > Am i right in thinking that I need apm compiled in the kernel to allow my
> > system to turn its own power off when i
> >
> > shutdown -h n
1 - 100 of 321 matches
Mail list logo
