Re: Using killfiles

2004-12-30 Thread Steve Lamb
ABrady wrote: Thank you for helping to make my point. You have no point. Anyone thinking that I propose imposing my will on anyone needs to look in a mirror. Your own religious/political OT stuff is the imposition on those of us wanting to deal with linux/Debian/derivatives, not the other way a

Re: Using killfiles

2004-12-30 Thread Steve Lamb
Paul Johnson wrote: That's more or less what I gathered from the snippy, off-list response I got from her. You, too, eh? -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.

Re: Using killfiles

2004-12-29 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 03:26 pm, Ron Johnson wrote (Re: Sue Spence): > On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 13:33 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > > So what's your excuse for using Reply-to-All instead of > > Reply-to-mailing-list, like the list rules also encourage? > > She's a bad netizen, and should be f

Re: Using killfiles

2004-12-29 Thread ABrady
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:01:07 + Sue Spence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Tuesday 28 December 2004 03:32 pm, John Hasler wrote: > > > >>Please stop changing the subject of this thread. It makes it hard > >to >keep it killfiled. > > > > > > Filter smarter, not harder

Re: Using killfiles

2004-12-29 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 13:33 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Wednesday 29 December 2004 01:01 pm, Sue Spence wrote: > > List subscribers shouldn't have to clean religious/political flamebait > > (& flames) from the messages they receive. To have to do this means > > that there are people on the li

Re: Using killfiles

2004-12-29 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 01:01 pm, Sue Spence wrote: > List subscribers shouldn't have to clean religious/political flamebait > (& flames) from the messages they receive. To have to do this means > that there are people on the list who are perfectly prepared to send > out messages containin

Re: Using killfiles

2004-12-29 Thread Sue Spence
Paul Johnson wrote: On Tuesday 28 December 2004 03:32 pm, John Hasler wrote: Please stop changing the subject of this thread. It makes it hard to keep it killfiled. Filter smarter, not harder. Most email filters out there these days have the concept of threads. If you use procmail, check out

Using killfiles

2004-12-29 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 03:32 pm, John Hasler wrote: > Please stop changing the subject of this thread. It makes it hard to > keep it killfiled. Filter smarter, not harder. Most email filters out there these days have the concept of threads. If you use procmail, check out the message IDs