On Wednesday 29 December 2004 01:01 pm, Sue Spence wrote: > List subscribers shouldn't have to clean religious/political flamebait > (& flames) from the messages they receive. To have to do this means > that there are people on the list who are perfectly prepared to send > out messages containing content that is essentially equivalent to the > lowest-common-denominator advertisements for drugs, porn, phishing > scams, hot stock tips, whatever.
That happens anyway. Open list. > Putting "OT", "Off Topic", "Way off topic" etc. in the subject title > doesn't even begin to justify that kind of poor listizenship. So what's your excuse for using Reply-to-All instead of Reply-to-mailing-list, like the list rules also encourage? -- Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/
pgpRn0aKi4yHK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
