On Sat 24 May 2014 at 09:56:59 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Apparently in all my fiddling, having changed the line in
> exim4.conf.template from satellite to internet, It has corrected
> update-exim4.conf.conf so that it reads:
>
> dc_eximconfig_configtype='smarthost'
A little apology from me he
Brian writes:
> On Sat 24 May 2014 at 01:29:04 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Brian writes:
>>
>> > On Thu 22 May 2014 at 22:43:37 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'll be back at it in 2wks or so.. I suspect it will be pretty simple
>> >> now.
>> >
>> > It should be after what follows:
Brian writes:
> On Sat 24 May 2014 at 01:29:04 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Brian writes:
>>
>> > On Thu 22 May 2014 at 22:43:37 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'll be back at it in 2wks or so.. I suspect it will be pretty simple
>> >> now.
>> >
>> > It should be after what follows:
On Sat 24 May 2014 at 17:51:19 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 01:29:04AM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> > Brian writes:
> >
> > > On Thu 22 May 2014 at 22:43:37 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> > >
> > >> I'll be back at it in 2wks or so.. I suspect it will be pretty simple
>
On Sat 24 May 2014 at 01:29:04 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Brian writes:
>
> > On Thu 22 May 2014 at 22:43:37 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> >
> >> I'll be back at it in 2wks or so.. I suspect it will be pretty simple
> >> now.
> >
> > It should be after what follows::)
> >
> > In update-exim
On Sat 24 May 2014 at 00:54:07 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Brian writes:
>
> Darac Marjal wrote:
> >> For exim,
> >> http://www.manu-j.com/blog/wordpress-exim4-ubuntu-gmail-smtp/75/
> >> suggests to set the smarthost to "mail.messagingengine.com::587" (when
> >> using debconf) and to add a new
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 01:29:04AM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Brian writes:
>
> > On Thu 22 May 2014 at 22:43:37 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> >
> >> I'll be back at it in 2wks or so.. I suspect it will be pretty simple
> >> now.
> >
> > It should be after what follows::)
> >
> > In update-e
Brian writes:
> On Thu 22 May 2014 at 22:43:37 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> I'll be back at it in 2wks or so.. I suspect it will be pretty simple
>> now.
>
> It should be after what follows::)
>
> In update-exim4.conf.conf change 'satellite' to 'internet'. There is a
> crucial addition to
Brian writes:
Darac Marjal wrote:
>> For exim,
>> http://www.manu-j.com/blog/wordpress-exim4-ubuntu-gmail-smtp/75/
>> suggests to set the smarthost to "mail.messagingengine.com::587" (when
>> using debconf) and to add a new routing driver. Probably easiest to just
>> read that page for the inform
On Thu 22 May 2014 at 22:43:37 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I'll be back at it in 2wks or so.. I suspect it will be pretty simple
> now.
It should be after what follows::)
In update-exim4.conf.conf change 'satellite' to 'internet'. There is a
crucial addition to make to dc_smarthost.
mai
First off, so many thanks are due to posters on this thread. You've
reduced a really vast amount of docu into a few paragraphs of just the
right stuff for my situation.
With my muddled thinking & incomplete background, I would have a been
a very long time getting to the stage offered in this thre
We may as well have a record that this thread is related to
https://lists.debian.org/87sio62xt1@newsguy.com
On Wed 21 May 2014 at 22:38:52 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Klaus writes:
>
> > The server (mail.messagingengine.com) doesn't respond to ping nor to an
> > attempt at connecting
Klaus writes:
> The server (mail.messagingengine.com) doesn't respond to ping nor to an
> attempt at connecting through port 25 right now (20/5/2014, 13:30 GMT)
>
> $ swaks -s mail.messagingengine.com -q FIRST-HELO
> === Trying mail.messagingengine.com:25...
> ^C (manually aborted after a minute
On Tue 20 May 2014 at 12:57:01 +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> According to
> https://www.fastmail.fm/help/technical/servernamesandports.html what you
> require is mail.messagingengine.com port 465 (old-style SSL) or port 587
> (with STARTTLS). You shouldn't need to pretend to be anyone else to send
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 06:22:49PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I'm trying to setup exim4 in a situation that has got to be pretty
> common. (Other than perhaps the choice of smtp server)
>
> In general it is:
>
> single user home machine running debian
>
> send mail to remote addresses by `smar
On 19/05/14 23:22, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I'm trying to setup exim4 in a situation that has got to be pretty
> common. (Other than perhaps the choice of smtp server)
>
> In general it is:
>
> single user home machine running debian
>
> send mail to remote addresses by `smart host'
>
> Retrieve m
I'm trying to setup exim4 in a situation that has got to be pretty
common. (Other than perhaps the choice of smtp server)
In general it is:
single user home machine running debian
send mail to remote addresses by `smart host'
Retrieve mail by fetchmail, or in some accounts just
use Imap and do
On Sunday 23 March 2008 04:05:24 am Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
> >> c) I want that standalone server receives LAN and internet mail of LAN
> >> users.
> >
> > When setting up exim, it'll ask you if you what range you want to act as
> > a smarthost for. Tell it your local network's information.
>
> Did
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 01:05:24PM +0200, Tero M?ntyvaara wrote:
>
> >You will also need to install some kind of POP or IMAP daemon to handle
> >this part.
> >
> What is/are the "default" POP and/or IMAP server(s) of the Debian etch?
There isn't a default POP or IMAP server, take your pick.
>
c) I want that standalone server receives LAN and internet mail of LAN
users.
When setting up exim, it'll ask you if you what range you want to act as a
smarthost for. Tell it your local network's information.
Did you mean range of IP addresses to act as a smarthost?
d) I want th
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Not by itself, no. You will need to install fetchmail, and each user
> will need to have a .fetchmailrc to fetch mail from another site.
You don't need one per user. I have a cron job run fetchmail as the user
"mailagent". Mailagent's .forward then runs Mailagent (could be
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:57:52 -0400
Paul Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed March 19 2008, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Stop now!
> haven't started yet, just getting info/background/knowledge:)
>
> >
> > Setting up mail services by fumbling in the dark has the very real
> > potential to mak
On Wed March 19 2008, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Stop now!
haven't started yet, just getting info/background/knowledge:)
>
> Setting up mail services by fumbling in the dark has the very real
> potential to make your mail server a spam vector. Before continuing, I
> strongly reccommend, at the very le
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 10:48:04 pm Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
> I think I should describe the situation of mine that I am dreaming of ;-).
>
> a) I have ADSL internet connection that has dynamic address and mail
> account by ISP. ISP is using some kind of port restriction for mail
> transfer to st
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/19/08 22:40, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 01:25:35 am Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
>> I have questions concerning usage of Exim4:
>> a) Can Exim4 be set so that it receives mail from mail accounts that
>> user has configured eg in his/her home directory?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/19/08 22:40, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 01:25:35 am Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
>> I have questions concerning usage of Exim4:
>> a) Can Exim4 be set so that it receives mail from mail accounts that
>> user has configured eg in h
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 06:17:54 am Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On Wed March 19 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > Exim sends emails. It is MTA.
> >
> > And it receives email, too.
>
> ok, I admit it, I know nothing about setting up mail servers,etc..
Stop now!
Setting up mail services by fumbling in
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 01:25:35 am Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
> I have questions concerning usage of Exim4:
> a) Can Exim4 be set so that it receives mail from mail accounts that
> user has configured eg in his/her home directory?
Not by itself, no. You will need to install fetchmail, and each us
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 09:17 -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On Wed March 19 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > Exim sends emails. It is MTA.
> >
> > And it receives email, too.
>
> ok, I admit it, I know nothing about setting up mail servers,etc..
> I have my own domain, and I have it hosted. What wo
On Wed March 19 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Exim sends emails. It is MTA.
>
> And it receives email, too.
ok, I admit it, I know nothing about setting up mail servers,etc..
I have my own domain, and I have it hosted. What would I need to run, besides
my kmail, to receive and send mail from my De
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/19/08 05:22, Andrius Burlega wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 10:25 +0200, Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have questions concerning usage of Exim4:
>> a) Can Exim4 be set so that it receives mail from mail accounts that
>> user has configure
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 10:25 +0200, Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have questions concerning usage of Exim4:
> a) Can Exim4 be set so that it receives mail from mail accounts that
> user has configured eg in his/her home directory?
> b) Can Exim4 deliver that received mail in LAN?
>
>
> Tero
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:25:35AM +0200, Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
>
> I have questions concerning usage of Exim4:
> a) Can Exim4 be set so that it receives mail from mail accounts that
> user has configured eg in his/her home directory?
Exim can receive email from any process or user on your syst
Hi
I have questions concerning usage of Exim4:
a) Can Exim4 be set so that it receives mail from mail accounts that
user has configured eg in his/her home directory?
b) Can Exim4 deliver that received mail in LAN?
Tero Mäntyvaara
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
e this thread for an account of some trouble I once had using exim
> with Gmail:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403583
>
That reference helped a lot! My error message, when attempting to send
mail from my GMail account, was (from memory) virtually identical wi
7;passwd.client' section of 'man
exim4-config_files'; read the manpage, and see this thread for an
account of some trouble I once had using exim with Gmail:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403583
[That problem has been fixed, but that might give you a flavor of the
I have located the following relevant info in
"/usr/share/doc/exim4-config/README.Debian.gz":
If you want to set up exim as SMTP AUTH client for delivery to your
internet access provider's smarthost put the name of the server, your
login and password in /etc/exim4/passwd.client. See the
> Brian Rosenberger wrote:
>
>
>>ldapuser:
>> driver = smartuser
>> local_parts = ${lookup
>>ldap{ldap://.xx:389/ou=SMTP%20Service,ou=Mailaccounts,dc=brutex,dc=n
>>et?([EMAIL PROTECTED])}{${local_part}}}
>> home_directory = ${lookup
>>ldap{ldap://.xx:389/ou=SMTP%20Service,ou=Mailaccoun
Brian Rosenberger wrote:
Brian Rosenberger wrote:
ldapuser:
driver = smartuser
local_parts = ${lookup
ldap{ldap://.xx:389/ou=SMTP%20Service,ou=Mailaccounts,dc=brutex,dc=n
et?([EMAIL PROTECTED])}{${local_part}}}
home_directory = ${lookup
ldap{ldap://.xx:389/ou=SMTP%20Service,ou=Mailacco
Brian Rosenberger wrote:
> ldapuser:
> driver = smartuser
> local_parts = ${lookup
> ldap{ldap://.xx:389/ou=SMTP%20Service,ou=Mailaccounts,dc=brutex,dc=n
> et?([EMAIL PROTECTED])}{${local_part}}}
> home_directory = ${lookup
> ldap{ldap://.xx:389/ou=SMTP%20Service,ou=Mailaccounts,dc=b
Brian Rosenberger wrote:
ldapuser:
driver = smartuser
local_parts = ${lookup
ldap{ldap://.xx:389/ou=SMTP%20Service,ou=Mailaccounts,dc=brutex,dc=n
et?([EMAIL PROTECTED])}{${local_part}}}
home_directory = ${lookup
ldap{ldap://.xx:389/ou=SMTP%20Service,ou=Mailaccounts,dc=brutex,dc=n
et?
Hi,
i tried to configure Exim 3.35 to do a LDAP lookup to determine wich
mailboxes are local. There are several sample configs around in the web,
however, I can´t get it running.
Here is my director in exim.conf:
-
ldapuser:
driver = smartuser
local_parts = ${l
* Benedict Verheyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If i understand correctly all of the above:
> 1. I could use exim on my server to relay all mail for me except to
> hotmail and yahoo.
> 2. I can setup everything at my isp's so that mail to my domain will be
> sent over to my pc.
>
I have exactly
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:34:26PM +0100, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:17:58AM +0100, Benedict Verheyen said
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> i have configured exim 4 and it runs fine. I use the smarthost option
>> >> and thus send mails via my ISP. I was wondering if i could do
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:34:26PM +0100, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:17:58AM +0100, Benedict Verheyen said
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> i have configured exim 4 and it runs fine. I use the smarthost option
> >> and thus send mails via my ISP. I was wondering if i could do the sam
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:17:58AM +0100, Benedict Verheyen said
>> Hi,
>>
>> i have configured exim 4 and it runs fine. I use the smarthost option
>> and thus send mails via my ISP. I was wondering if i could do the same
>> by NOT using the smarthost option and use my exim4 to do this?
>
> Yup,
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:17:58AM +0100, Benedict Verheyen said
>> Hi,
>>
>> i have configured exim 4 and it runs fine. I use the smarthost option
>> and thus send mails via my ISP. I was wondering if i could do the same
>> by NOT using the smarthost option and use my exim4 to do this?
>
> Yup,
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:17:58AM +0100, Benedict Verheyen said
> Hi,
>
> i have configured exim 4 and it runs fine. I use the smarthost option
> and thus send mails via my ISP. I was wondering if i could do the same
> by NOT using the smarthost option and use my exim4 to do this?
Yup, it's easy
Hi,
i have configured exim 4 and it runs fine. I use the smarthost option
and thus send mails via my ISP. I was wondering if i could do the same
by NOT using the smarthost option and use my exim4 to do this?
Also, i've have always wondered how one sets up a "real" mail server:
if you had a domain
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 09:04, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As to why involve exim? You need an MTA installed for cron, etc,
> > anyway, so it may as well be exim.. And, although I've never tried to
> > set up fetchmail, some have said it was a wee bit more compl
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 03:04:42PM +0200, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > anyway, so it may as well be exim.. And, although I've never tried to
> > set up fetchmail, some have said it was a wee bit more complicated than
> > exim, dunno about that..
>
> Are you saying
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As to why involve exim? You need an MTA installed for cron, etc,
> anyway, so it may as well be exim.. And, although I've never tried to
> set up fetchmail, some have said it was a wee bit more complicated than
> exim, dunno about that..
Are you saying you u
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:43:22AM -0500, Jamin W.Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:39:18 +0100 Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > This seems very odd. I thought that Debian set up exim more or less by
> > default.
>
> It does, for _delivery_ of mail provided to it. The
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 04:15:21PM +0200, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> > Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:50:17PM +0100, Pat Colbeck wrote:
> > > > "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail || exit 75 #fredsmith"
> > >
> > > Good to
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 04:15:21PM +0200, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> The explanation was for fetchmail, not exim. And I still don't see
> how it would be a good idea to use exim to receive mail on a machine
> not usually connected to the Internet.
And I still fail to see how it matters. It's not th
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 04:15:21PM +0200, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:50:17PM +0100, Pat Colbeck wrote:
> > > "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail || exit 75 #fredsmith"
> >
> > Good to do it explicitly, but Exim will automatically
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Jamin W.Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:51:59 -0400 (EDT) Mark Carroll
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Then you're using fetchmail, not exim, to receive mail - it's just a
> > matter of terminology. (Of course, exim performs the local delivery
> > after'receiving'
Jamin W.Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:51:59 -0400 (EDT) Mark Carroll
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Then you're using fetchmail, not exim, to receive mail - it's just a
> > matter of terminology. (Of course, exim performs the local delivery
> > after'receiving' fr
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:51:59 -0400 (EDT) Mark Carroll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then you're using fetchmail, not exim, to receive mail - it's just a
> matter of terminology. (Of course, exim performs the local delivery
> after'receiving' from fetchmail - that's quite normal.)
Not necessarily,
On 15 Oct 2002, Jamin W.Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:39:18 +0100 Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > This seems very odd. I thought that Debian set up exim more or less by
> > default.
>
> It does, for _delivery_ of mail provided to it. The OP was looking for a
> sim
ou really know what you're doing).
>
> Why is this? I'm using it on a dialup account. Perhaps we are talking
> about different usages here. What I do is retrieve my mail from my
> ISP's mailserver using POP3 with fetchmail. As I said in my previous
> post, using Exi
ou really know what you're doing).
>
> Why is this? I'm using it on a dialup account. Perhaps we are talking
> about different usages here. What I do is retrieve my mail from my
> ISP's mailserver using POP3 with fetchmail. As I said in my previous
> post, usi
rting incoming mail into folders.
In order to receive mail using exim you would need to have set up an
MX record for your domein pointing to your machine on your nameserver,
which is obviously not the case for the people who ask how to set up
their mail filtering.
Ciao,
Jens
P.S.: after writing t
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:39:18 +0100 Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This seems very odd. I thought that Debian set up exim more or less by
> default.
It does, for _delivery_ of mail provided to it. The OP was looking for a
simple way to deliver and sort mail to local boxes for (pr
ilboxes. If
> I understand some of the posters in this thread, they have stated that
> you cannot, but this is what I'm doing. You will find this info in the
> file "filter.txt.gz" in /usr/share/doc/exim. It could well be that
> using exim for a single-user account is ov
p account. Perhaps we are talking
about different usages here. What I do is retrieve my mail from my
ISP's mailserver using POP3 with fetchmail. As I said in my previous
post, using Exim for this purpose may be overkill, but AFAICT, it works..
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to use exim _at all_ to
> > > > receive mail on a machine that is not permanently connected to the
> > > > Internet (unless you really know what you're doing).
> > >
> > > Really? When did this change? I've been using exim on a config I've
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:50:17PM +0100, Pat Colbeck wrote:
> > "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail || exit 75 #fredsmith"
>
> Good to do it explicitly, but Exim will automatically deliver using
> procmail if you have a ~/.procmailrc
The explanation was f
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:50:17PM +0100, Pat Colbeck wrote:
> "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail || exit 75 #fredsmith"
Good to do it explicitly, but Exim will automatically deliver using
procmail if you have a ~/.procmailrc
> :0
> * ^TO_.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> debian-user/
I think it's general
Mark Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 15 Oct 2002, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> > When did what change?
>
> That you need to really know what you're doing to use exim to receive mail
> on a machine that is not permanently connected to the Internet, I'd guess,
> Paul's implication presumably be
that is not permanently connected to the
> > > Internet (unless you really know what you're doing).
> >
> > Really? When did this change? I've been using exim on a config I've
> > only made minor changes to since I set it up four years ago.
>
> Whe
less you really know what you're doing).
>
> Really? When did this change? I've been using exim on a config I've
> only made minor changes to since I set it up four years ago.
When did what change?
Ciao,
Jens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this change? I've been using exim on a config I've
only made minor changes to since I set it up four years ago.
--
Baloo
msg07066/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Exim (or at least 3.35) can distribute mail to different mailboxes. If
> I understand some of the posters in this thread, they have stated that
> you cannot, but this is what I'm doing.
Obviously it can. But you just don't want to use exim _at all_ to
receiv
filter.txt.gz" in /usr/share/doc/exim. It could well be that
> using exim for a single-user account is overkill, but it works.
(snip)
Yes - TBH, I've never had to figure out how to use procmail, because exim
filters have always done everything I've wanted that other people use
procma
ute mail to different mailboxes. If
I understand some of the posters in this thread, they have stated that
you cannot, but this is what I'm doing. You will find this info in the
file "filter.txt.gz" in /usr/share/doc/exim. It could well be that
using exim for a single-user a
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:01:46 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Wilhelm
Land) wrote:
> Does exim allow the config. of simple mail delivery
> on the following system?:
>
> -One mashine, connected tmp. to the internet
> -one user with only one email adress and
> who likes to have his incoming mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Wilhelm Land) writes:
> Jens Grivolla wrote:
> > The "only one email address" part makes me think you really want to
> > poll an external mailbox using POP3 or IMAP. Exim does not have
> > anything to do with this, you need to use fetchmail or a MUA that does
> > it. F
Jens Grivolla wrote:
>
> So you want to _receive_ mail with exim on a machine that is only
> temporarily connected to the internet?
>
> This is possible if you know what you're doing (and have a permanently
> connected machine elsewhere that relays to you). However, it does not
> really look li
I think what you really need is fetchmail and procmail I am afraid. But
not to worry a basic setup is not too difficult.
Fetchmail
To get your mail from a pop3 account create a .fetchmailrc in your home
directory that looks like this
defaults proto pop3
set daemon 120
poll somemailserver.bigis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Wilhelm Land) writes:
> Does exim allow the config. of simple mail delivery
> on the following system?:
>
> -One mashine, connected tmp. to the internet
> -one user with only one email adress and
> who likes to have his incoming mail sorted as:
> +one inbox for eac
Does exim allow the config. of simple mail delivery
on the following system?:
-One mashine, connected tmp. to the internet
-one user with only one email adress and
who likes to have his incoming mail sorted as:
+one inbox for each subscribed maillist
+one inbox for all the other mail
Unf
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 09:21:45AM +0200, Robert Ian Smit wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:43:46PM +1000, Geoff Crompton wrote:
> >Is it possible to configure exim on homepc to use dially as a smart
> >relay, and to continually poll dially (say every 5 minutes) to try
> >and deliver
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:43:46PM +1000, Geoff Crompton wrote:
>Is it possible to configure exim on homepc to use dially as a smart
>relay, and to continually poll dially (say every 5 minutes) to try
>and deliver email? It could be almost a week between times that
>dially actually
Seeing as there are some people around here that seem to understand
exim, I thought that I'd try and sort out an answer to something at
home.
I have a simple network like this:
|
| dialup
|dially|-|homepc|
LAN
On 09 Sep 2002, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > Or what is the favoured way for a dialup machine to send mails from
> > > within mutt?
> >
> > In /etc/ip-up.d/exim I have the following line:
> >
> If you mean /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/exim, I have got that already, but only
> exim -
Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > Or what is the favoured way for a dialup machine to send mails from
> > within mutt?
>
> In /etc/ip-up.d/exim I have the following line:
>
If you mean /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/exim, I have got that already, but only
exim -qf. I'll add a second f to it.
> /usr/sbin/exim -qff
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:49:00AM +0200, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> Hi List
>
> Some weeks ago I switched from kmail to mutt/exim. At first I did not
> realize that exim did not deliver several e-mails, some to the list, and
> some private ones. I saw using "exim -bs -bp&qu
On 09 Sep 2002, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> Hi List
>
> Some weeks ago I switched from kmail to mutt/exim. At first I did not
> realize that exim did not deliver several e-mails, some to the list, and
> some private ones. I saw using "exim -bs -bp", that those mails are
>
Hi List
Some weeks ago I switched from kmail to mutt/exim. At first I did not
realize that exim did not deliver several e-mails, some to the list, and
some private ones. I saw using "exim -bs -bp", that those mails are
marked '*** frozen ***'. I don't know why this is
Glyn Millington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Brian, thanks for taking the trouble to write this - it's been useful!
I'd like to second this. Thanks Brian for your reply. Very much
appreciated.
Mark.
--
_/\___/~~\
/~~\_/~
Brian, thanks for taking the trouble to write this - it's been useful!
Glyn M
--
so here we are then
http://members.tripod.co.uk/Christchurch2000uk
Running Debian/Gnu Linux
3:27am up 21 min, 2 users,
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 10:53:36AM +1030, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Thanks for your reply on this. There are still some things I don't
> understand very well though.
>
> Yes it does use SMTP envelope sender, but the problem (I was told) was
> that when the bounced message got back to cheapisp.com.au
Thanks for your reply on this. There are still some things I don't
understand very well though.
brian moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 10:05:13AM +1030, Mark Phillips wrote:
> > Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > enable /etc/email-address use. I use this s
>
> All in all, it is a bad idea --- so I'm told. The _correct_ solution,
> I was told, is to tell the truth about the "From:" address, ie keep it
> as [EMAIL PROTECTED], but to set the "Reply-To:" field to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> So this is what I want to do, except I don't know how to do it.
Mark Phillips wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > enable /etc/email-address use. I use this so that mail from
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] becomes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
...
> All in all, it is a bad idea --- so I'm told. The _correct_ solution,
> I was told, is to tell the truth ab
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 10:05:13AM +1030, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > enable /etc/email-address use. I use this so that mail from
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] becomes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I could do this, but I have been told in the past that this is bad.
> L
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> enable /etc/email-address use. I use this so that mail from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] becomes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I could do this, but I have been told in the past that this is bad.
Let me explain what I was told. If my secondary isp thinks of me as
"[EMAIL
>
> My alternative is to configure a "Reply-To:" field so that people
> reply to the correct address, even when the email comes "From:"
> somewhere different. But what is the best way of doing this? It
> would be nice to do this at the exim layer, independent of MUA, but I
> can't find any infor
Hi,
I have more than one ISP that I use, but I want all mail to me to be
addressed to a single email address. The way I have handled this in
the past is to use exim to make my emails _seem_ to come from the one
address, even if really they don't always. I have been told however,
that this is a b
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
