Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-29 Thread Christopher L. Everett
What are the plans for T-Bird 1.0? I want to make it the company standard email tool, but I need some features in 1.0. -- Christopher L. Everett Chief Technology Officer www.medbanner.com MedBanner, Inc. www.physemp.com -- To

Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-29 Thread Christopher L. Everett
What are the plans for T-Bird 1.0? I want to make it the company standard email tool, but I need some features in 1.0. -- Christopher L. Everett Chief Technology Officer www.medbanner.com MedBanner, Inc. www.physemp.com -- To

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-28 Thread Steve Lamb
Darryl Clarke wrote: As for timeframe into when 1.0 will be in... I have no idea. It's suprisingly not even in Unstable yet... The maintainer has 1.0 on his private repository presently and is working on getting it into unstable soon. Ah, here's the message: http://lists.debian.org/debian-use

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-28 Thread Ron Johnson
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 21:18 +, Alan Chandler wrote: > On Tuesday 28 December 2004 20:58, Christopher L. Everett wrote: > > What are the plans for T-Bird 1.0? I want to make it the company > > standard email tool, but I need some features in 1.0. > > Why do you want to make it the standard too

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-28 Thread Darryl Clarke
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 21:18:58 +, Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 28 December 2004 20:58, Christopher L. Everett wrote: > > What are the plans for T-Bird 1.0? I want to make it the company > > standard email tool, but I need some features in 1.0. > > Why do you want to mak

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-28 Thread Alan Chandler
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 20:58, Christopher L. Everett wrote: > What are the plans for T-Bird 1.0? I want to make it the company > standard email tool, but I need some features in 1.0. Why do you want to make it the standard tool if you do not know what features it has. Why aren't to evaluat

Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-28 Thread Christopher L. Everett
What are the plans for T-Bird 1.0? I want to make it the company standard email tool, but I need some features in 1.0. -- Christopher L. Everett Chief Technology Officer www.medbanner.com MedBanner, Inc. www.physemp.com -- To U

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-18 Thread Sam Halliday
Ralph Katz wrote: perhaps you might see the same as i do if you temporarily move your .mozilla-thunderbird folder out of the way, and set up a new account. Ouch! You're right. Fresh install ain't working for enigmail. You should file a bug report. Alex is very good with the fixes. (I've filed s

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-18 Thread Sam Halliday
Ralph Katz wrote: perhaps you might see the same as i do if you temporarily move your .mozilla-thunderbird folder out of the way, and set up a new account. Ouch! You're right. Fresh install ain't working for enigmail. You should file a bug report. Alex is very good with the fixes. (I've filed s

Re: Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-18 Thread Ralph Katz
perhaps you might see the same as i do if you temporarily move your .mozilla-thunderbird folder out of the way, and set up a new account. Ouch! You're right. Fresh install ain't working for enigmail. You should file a bug report. Alex is very good with the fixes. (I've filed several reports on

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-18 Thread Sam Halliday
Steve Lamb wrote: Sam Halliday wrote: i don't care for any of this Personal Certificate stuff... i just want to use it with GPG. and in fact, Thunderbird is *ignoring* all the PGP/Mime attachments for all the emails i have looked at which i *know* have signatures (over IMAP). it is also saying t

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-18 Thread Stephen Patterson
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:00:28 +0100, Sam Halliday wrote: > does anyone know if thunderbird 1.0 is going to make it into unstable > anytime soon? No idea, but the official dist from the tunderbird sites is a precompiled tarball that extracts very neatly into a directory, and youcan ju

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-17 Thread Steve Lamb
Sam Halliday wrote: i don't care for any of this Personal Certificate stuff... i just want to use it with GPG. and in fact, Thunderbird is *ignoring* all the PGP/Mime attachments for all the emails i have looked at which i *know* have signatures (over IMAP). it is also saying that ASCII signed e

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-17 Thread Sam Halliday
Steve Lamb wrote: Sam Halliday wrote: but upon sending any mails, there is no signature made and it doesn't even ask for my passphrase! if i go into the Security menu when Composing a message and ask to encrypt or sign the message, it gives me some speil about Personal Certificates. so i do not

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-17 Thread Sam Halliday
Sam Halliday wrote: i think i will install gpg-agent and see if that makes a difference. i cannot find gpg-agent in the debian package lists, so i guess that isn't the problem... cheers, Sam -- Free High School Science Texts http://www.nongnu.org/fhsst/ Sam's Homepages http://fommil.homeunix

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-17 Thread Steve Lamb
Sam Halliday wrote: but upon sending any mails, there is no signature made and it doesn't even ask for my passphrase! if i go into the Security menu when Composing a message and ask to encrypt or sign the message, it gives me some speil about Personal Certificates. so i do not think it has been

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-17 Thread Sam Halliday
Ralph Katz wrote: Steve Lamb wrote: Sam Halliday wrote: by the way, i installed the enigmail plugin, but i am having real hassles trying to get it to work with GPG signing/encryption. has anyone got a HOWTO or some advice on how to set this up? Make sure to turn on hushmail support. It passes the

Re: Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-17 Thread Ralph Katz
On 12/17/2004 06:50 PM, Steve Lamb wrote: Sam Halliday wrote: by the way, i installed the enigmail plugin, but i am having real hassles trying to get it to work with GPG signing/encryption. has anyone got a HOWTO or some advice on how to set this up? Make sure to turn on hushmail support. It pass

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-17 Thread Sam Halliday
Ralph Katz wrote: Sam Halliday wrote: does anyone know if thunderbird 1.0 is going to make it into unstable anytime soon? Alexander Sack, the debian maintainer, has what you want on his website: http://www.jwsdot.com/debian/index.html drat... no powerpc builds... cheers, Sam -- Free High School

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-17 Thread Steve Lamb
Sam Halliday wrote: by the way, i installed the enigmail plugin, but i am having real hassles trying to get it to work with GPG signing/encryption. has anyone got a HOWTO or some advice on how to set this up? Make sure to turn on hushmail support. It passes the email address devoid of < and

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-17 Thread Sam Halliday
Ralph Katz wrote: Sam Halliday wrote: does anyone know if thunderbird 1.0 is going to make it into unstable anytime soon? Alexander Sack, the debian maintainer, has what you want on his website: http://www.jwsdot.com/debian/index.html thanks! by the way, i installed the enigmail plugin, but i am

Re: Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-17 Thread Ralph Katz
On 12/17/2004 12:00 PM, Sam Halliday wrote: hi there, does anyone know if thunderbird 1.0 is going to make it into unstable anytime soon? cheers Alexander Sack, the debian maintainer, has what you want on his website: http://www.jwsdot.com/debian/index.html Debian Thunderbird HOME Regards

Thunderbird 1.0

2004-12-17 Thread Sam Halliday
hi there, does anyone know if thunderbird 1.0 is going to make it into unstable anytime soon? cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]