RE: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-12-04 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Some of you obviously "get it." My hats off to you! I've done tech support for a few years for various organisations. During my time there, I learned that Mr Maziuk has more than the right idea. We don't tolerate people who don't understand the simpl

RE: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-12-03 Thread Jeff . Chimene
Some of you obviously "get it." My hats off to you!Others, sadly, do not: -Original Message-From: Dimitri Maziuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 17:53To: debian-user@lists.debian.orgSubject: Re: Thoughts on RTFMGood. I sincerely hope it'll stay ther

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-12-02 Thread Michael Heldebrant
On Sat, 2001-12-01 at 07:34, Tom Allison wrote: > My point is this: > If all you ever want is the step by step instructions, that is all you > will ever know. This is more or less the key for me to understanding why other people can't be bothered to read the manual. If it's not in a step by ste

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-12-02 Thread martin f krafft
* Peter Good <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.30 23:14:24+1000]: > Hence why i'm subscribed to this list hehehehe, it's amazing the things i've > picked up over the past year, defintely helped my newbie status. also a very good and very valid point. now, peter, it's about time you start answering so

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-12-01 Thread Tom Allison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I really don't want to single out Viktor Rosenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED], > but his opinion is the pearl seed for a particular observation. > Simultaneously, it represents the "rational" voice of most people > who try to carry the stone, and is astonishingly wide of the

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-12-01 Thread Johnny Ernst Nielsen
> No-one, on any > list, is going to attempt to answer a question like: "I just bought > a CD and my computer won't read it. What's wrong?" Um, I see that particular question on and off on different lists. So you better think again sir. > Tell me, [list], how would you phrase such a question so t

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-30 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Alan Shutko wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > For example, I just purchased the Debian distro from LSL. Guess > > what? > [...] > > Tell me, [list], how would you phrase such a question so that it > > could be solved with "step-by-step instructions" that don't elicit > > the answer under

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-30 Thread dman
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:52:57PM -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: | * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: | ... | > This is the sort of Pollyanna Principle thinking that will keep Linux on the | > sidelines. | | Good. I sincerely hope it'll stay there -- the last thing I want | in

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-30 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: ... > This is the sort of Pollyanna Principle thinking that will keep Linux on the > sidelines. Good. I sincerely hope it'll stay there -- the last thing I want in my mailbox is mail from lusers who need a dancing paper clip to tell them how

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-30 Thread Alan Shutko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Simultaneously, it represents the "rational" voice of most people > who try to carry the stone, and is astonishingly wide of the > mark. I'm having trouble finding your point. Maybe you could clarify it? Is it that you think that nobody would ever say more than "RTFM"

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-30 Thread Jeff . Chimene
I really don't want to single out Viktor Rosenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED], but his opinion is the pearl seed for a particular observation. Simultaneously, it represents the "rational" voice of most people who try to carry the stone, and is astonishingly wide of the mark. So: > [1] I don't really have an

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-30 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 10:46:15PM -0400, cmasters ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Greetings all, > > My recent difficulties with printer and mail setup have led to to the > point where I simply must express my thoughts on "RTFM". > > 1. I'm beginning that this

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-30 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2001-11-30T15:52:18Z, Viktor Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Unfortunately, I also had my fair share of people, who just wanted total > step-by-step instructions, didn't care for the information I gave them, > asked follow-up question, that showed, that they haven't put a single > thou

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-30 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Hi Bud, Bud Rogers wrote: > Some linux newbies are lucky enough to find an elmer to help them get > started. I was. He spent hours on the phone with me, talking me > through my first install of Slackware in the summer of 1995. He spent > more hours on email and ytalk helping me customize an

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-30 Thread Peter Good
Hence why i'm subscribed to this list hehehehe, it's amazing the things i've picked up over the past year, defintely helped my newbie status. Peter. On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:00, dman wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 11:41:39PM -0500, Alan Shutko wrote: > [lots of good comments] > > I must say tha

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-30 Thread George Karaolides
c of Cyprus On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, cmasters wrote: > Greetings all, > > My recent difficulties with printer and mail setup have led to to the point > where I simply must express my thoughts on "RTFM". > > 1. I'm beginning that this should be the credo to linux

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-30 Thread Bud Rogers
On Thursday 29 November 2001 23:31 pm, Paolo Falcone wrote: > Depends on the mentality of the user. There are users who are > willing to help other users, while there are others who'd only > help if the clueless user has exhausted all means aside from > reading the manual, some simply help people

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-30 Thread Bud Rogers
On Thursday 29 November 2001 22:28 pm, Charles Baker wrote: > <> > > > > > apt-get install linuxcookbook > > I just tried the above using source.list entries for > > stable, and it > > wasn't downloaded: > I just got in, but I'm using unstable. And I'm apt-getting it from woody as I type. --

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-30 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 10:46:15PM -0400, cmasters wrote: > Greetings all, Greetings. > My recent difficulties with printer and mail setup have led to to the point > where I simply must express my thoughts on "RTFM". RTFM is easy. If you stack with Linux, sometimes best an

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-29 Thread Mike Pfleger
* Alan Shutko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > It's likely that their situation is not identical to yours. Some > people learn better in this way than others. When I began learning > Linux, I simply read all the available documentation and pieced things > together where I could. In fact, I'd read

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-29 Thread Paolo Falcone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Greetings all, > >My recent difficulties with printer and mail setup have led to to the point >where I simply must express my thoughts on "RTFM". > >1. I'm beginning that this should be the credo to linux use. Which >would be >f

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-29 Thread Gary Turner
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 23:41:39 -0500, you wrote: >cmasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Do you see. No-one can possible be expected to ~read for comprehension~ a >> manual that has ~not~ been written with a ~complete~ newbie in >> mind. Dman and Alan, You both have made excellent points. Ma

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-29 Thread dman
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 11:41:39PM -0500, Alan Shutko wrote: [lots of good comments] I must say that Alan has done a better job of describing the situation than I did. I too have found it very useful (and enjoyable) to read docs that seem interesting, yet I often don't understand or have a use fo

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-29 Thread Alan Shutko
cmasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you see. No-one can possible be expected to ~read for comprehension~ a > manual that has ~not~ been written with a ~complete~ newbie in > mind. Remember that most of the people who tell others to RTFM are people who _have_ bootstrapped themselves from no

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-29 Thread Charles Baker
<> > > > apt-get install linuxcookbook > I just tried the above using source.list entries for > stable, and it > wasn't downloaded: > > inneal:~# apt-get install linuxcookbook > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > E: Couldn't find package linuxcookbook > inneal:~#

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-29 Thread Xeno Campanoli
Ian Monroe wrote: > > A surprising about information is still locked up in books. Though some > are availible online, checking out your local huge bookstore is a good > idea. > > Ian Monroe > http://mlug.missouri.edu/~eean/ > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Lance Simmons wrote: > > > A book that's full

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-29 Thread dman
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 10:46:15PM -0400, cmasters wrote: | Greetings all, | | My recent difficulties with printer and mail setup have led to to the point | where I simply must express my thoughts on "RTFM". ... | Their are shortcuts, strange citations, symbols and references to | struc

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-29 Thread Ian Monroe
A surprising about information is still locked up in books. Though some are availible online, checking out your local huge bookstore is a good idea. Ian Monroe http://mlug.missouri.edu/~eean/ On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Lance Simmons wrote: > A book that's full of useful examples is _The Linux Cookbook

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-29 Thread Lance Simmons
A book that's full of useful examples is _The Linux Cookbook_ by Michael Stutz, available in paperback from Linux Journal Press, and also by apt-get install linuxcookbook Another extremely useful book for getting the whole unix thing is _Think Unix_ by Jon Lasser (QUE, 2000) -- Lance Simmons

Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-29 Thread Kurt Lieber
On Thursday 29 November 2001 06:46 pm, cmasters wrote: > Last words (for now) ... in order for Open Source to have continued and > increasing validity, it ~has~ to mean more than just "change at will". It > must include "if I've written the application, I will include ~clear~ > instructions". Ther

Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-29 Thread cmasters
Greetings all, My recent difficulties with printer and mail setup have led to to the point where I simply must express my thoughts on "RTFM". 1. I'm beginning that this should be the credo to linux use. Which would be fine if reading the "fine" manual didn't impl