>>Now I heard of, that a NVME drive will only get to full speed, if UEFI is
>>activated in BIOS. Is this correct?
> No, at least for linux; I can't speak to windows.
+1
Stefan
> New machines may not have "legacy/MBR" options to boot any more.
>
Mine is a used one, a Dell 5400, and luckily it can still use legacy boot.
> A straightforward new installation of Debian should create the ESP and
> appropriate means to install under UEFI. If you're installing Windows,
> then
> Be sure not to reboot after cloning while both source and target remain
> enabled.
I always shut down the device completely. then wait a few seaconds. disconnect
all drives (Lifefile usb drive and storage) and then start the machine again.
In the past I never had any issues doing so.
Cheers
" options to boot any more.
> Thus, it was easy for me, cloning debian to any other hardware in the past to
> a ssd drive.
>
> Now I heard of, that a NVME drive will only get to full speed, if UEFI is
> activated in BIOS. Is this correct?
>
As above, you may not have the choi
Hans composed on 2025-01-16 16:57 (UTC+0100):
>> That depends on how you describe partitions in /etc/fstab. If you use
>> the device name, then almost certainly yes. If you use the label or
>> UUID, then no.
> Oh, that is cool, as I am using only UUID in fstab. Thus, just clone the
> drive
> wi
> Those are created at boot time, by udev.
I unde5rstand.
>
> That depends on how you describe partitions in /etc/fstab. If you use
> the device name, then almost certainly yes. If you use the label or
> UUID, then no.
>
Oh, that is cool, as I am using only UUID in fstab. Thus, just clone the d
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 16:17:29 +0100
Hans wrote:
> Another question, not really important: The device names, like
> "/dev/hdX", "/ dev/sdX" and now "/dev/nvmeX" - who is creating these?
> The kernel? Must /etc/ fstab be manually changed, when changing the
> kind of harddrive?
Those are created at
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 04:17:29PM +0100, Hans wrote:
Now I heard of, that a NVME drive will only get to full speed, if UEFI is
activated in BIOS. Is this correct?
No, at least for linux; I can't speak to windows.
Another question, not really important: The device names, like &quo
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 16:17:29 +0100
Hans wrote:
> I am asking, because if NOT, than it would spare me a lot of work, to
> create an UEFI partituion, rewrite the bootloaders, fstab,
> configurations and so on.
The Debian installer (the installer on the netinst CD, not the live CD)
will cheerfully
get to full speed, if UEFI is
activated in BIOS. Is this correct?
I am asking, because if NOT, than it would spare me a lot of work, to create
an UEFI partituion, rewrite the bootloaders, fstab, configurations and so on.
Speed of Windows is not so important for me, but speed of debian is more
On Fri 25 Oct 2024 at 09:19:30 (-0400), eben@somewhere wrote:
> > Not using synaptic, I don't know why that path was chosen. But
> > you'd need world-execute all the way down from /root itself.
>
> Well the chmod thing is not acceptable.
Totally reasonable; any world-readable file in /root
would
On 10/24/24 22:20, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 24 Oct 2024 at 20:34:18 (-0400), e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 10/24/24 20:01, David Wright wrote:
Because of the ownership:
$ ls -l /var/cache/apt/archives/
total 4
-rw-r- 1 root root0 Apr 16 2022 lock
drwx-- 2 _apt root 4096
Eben, don't worry, got into same issue with some mails sent from debian.
These are then marked with the "*SPAM*" tag in the header, althpough
it is no spam. It as someting to do with DKIM. I already noticed debian of it,
but they say, they are not responsible and some other mailer is do
On 10/24/24 22:33, David Wright wrote:
> Anyway, it appears I can't reply to eben's posts in this thread but,
> if this gets through, I can reply to my own. (And to Daniel Roberts
> earlier.) What triggers their spam detector software, presumably
> "mailclean11", I have no idea.
I don't know why
Dunno, if it is correct:
I fell into the same issue. Just deleted the complete folder, then started
synaptic again and the folder was new created = issue gone.
Not sure, if this is enough. Maybe the reason is, debian is working on umask
settings and (as far as I read), there is normally no "def
On Thu 24 Oct 2024 at 21:20:28 (-0500), David Wright wrote:
[ … ]
> Apologies ditto.
That should have read:
Apologies, BTW, for losing the threading, but for some reason, my
email host rejected so many permutations of my post (nine, in fact)
that it became apparent the problem might lie in the
On Thu 24 Oct 2024 at 20:34:18 (-0400), e...@gmx.us wrote:
> On 10/24/24 20:01, David Wright wrote:
> > Because of the ownership:
> >
> >$ ls -l /var/cache/apt/archives/
> >total 4
> >-rw-r- 1 root root0 Apr 16 2022 lock
> >drwx-- 2 _apt root 4096 Oct 22 19:00 partial
>
On 10/24/24 20:01, David Wright wrote:
Because of the ownership:
$ ls -l /var/cache/apt/archives/
total 4
-rw-r- 1 root root0 Apr 16 2022 lock
drwx-- 2 _apt root 4096 Oct 22 19:00 partial
$
we can assume that _apt is the user that actually downloads packages
(into pa
Because of the ownership:
$ ls -l /var/cache/apt/archives/
total 4
-rw-r- 1 root root0 Apr 16 2022 lock
drwx-- 2 _apt root 4096 Oct 22 19:00 partial
$
we can assume that _apt is the user that actually downloads packages
(into partial/) before APT installs them. But your ass
Dunno if this helps.
My cpu is an Intel I7-2670QM.
The related files, you might need to check are:
/etc/laptop-mode/conf.d/cpufreq.conf
As far as I remember I chaned nothing here in the past.
Second one is:
/etc/modules
in here I set the following
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:20:45 -0400
e...@gmx.us wrote:
Hello e...@gmx.us,
>Is that in the package "linux-cpupower", or where do you get it?
No, it's what I called it. However, upon checking, I see that it's not
in stable. linux-cpupower, AFAIUI, will also do the job.
--
Regards _ "Val
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:46:05 -0400
Eben King wrote:
Hello Eben,
>less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed?
Yes. I use cpupower-gui for that sort of thing.
--
Regards _ "Valid sig separator is {dash}{dash}{space}"
/ ) &q
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 3:04 PM Michael Kjörling wrote:
>
> On 23 Oct 2024 14:46 -0400, from e...@gmx.us (Eben King):
> > I have a variable-speed CPU. Normally the OS manages it. If I want to make
> > less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed
On 10/23/24 17:02, Hans wrote:
Such I can do unattended tasks safely. I believe, this is what the op wants to
do.
The video card I have (GTX 970) doesn't enable its fan by default, plus
gives bizarre ever-changing values for fan speed when you ask it. I found a
workaround, by disablin
On 10/23/24 16:46, Hans wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2024, 20:46:05 CEST schrieb Eben King:
>> I have a variable-speed CPU. Normally the OS manages it. If I want to make
>> less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed?
>
> Try the command
800 MHz.
Then ran "glxgears", which normally let the cpu raise to full clock speed, but
got the same
result: all cores are 800 MHz.
I am suing this, when my computer is working and will not need much cpu-power,
for example,
when building a livefile system. Most work then is writin
Am Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2024, 20:46:05 CEST schrieb Eben King:
> I have a variable-speed CPU. Normally the OS manages it. If I want to make
> less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed?
Try the command "cpufreq-set" like the example:
cpufreq-set -c
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 22:46:09 +0200, Hans wrote:
> #:/bin/bash
>
> cpufreq-set -c 0 -u 800MHz
> cpufreq-set -c 1 -u 800MHz
> cpufreq-set -c 2 -u 800MHz
> cpufreq-set -c 3 -u 800MHz
For the record, that should be #!/bin/bash instead of #:/bin/bash
(or you could use #!/bin/sh in this case, since
Eben King wrote:
> I have a variable-speed CPU. Normally the OS manages it. If I want to make
> less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed?
If you're trying to control the heat--i.e., the power dissipation--your BIOS
may have a CPU setting for the PL1, Po
On 10/23/24 14:52, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:46:05 -0400
Eben King wrote:
Hello Eben,
less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed?
Yes. I use cpupower-gui for that sort of thing.
Is that in the package "linux-cpupower", or where do
On 23 Oct 2024 14:46 -0400, from e...@gmx.us (Eben King):
> I have a variable-speed CPU. Normally the OS manages it. If I want to make
> less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed?
CPU speed is controlled by the CPU frequency governor.
Set /sys/devices/syst
I have a variable-speed CPU. Normally the OS manages it. If I want to make
less heat inside the case, is it possible to cap it at a certain speed?
--
Did they get you to trade your heroes for ghosts? Hot ashes for trees?
Hot air for a cool breeze? Cold comfort for change?
Did you exchange a
ory
>
I meant CMOS settings.
https://www.ifixit.com/Wiki/Motherboard_CMOS_Configuration_and_Setup
>> for both CPU and System. Is there something I can use which
>> will automatically configure fan speed?
>
> I'm not aware of a way to do this from software, but you can
> will automatically configure fan speed?
I'm not aware of a way to do this from software, but you can
do this with the UEFI (modern-day BIOS) for PWM and DC fans.
But you knew that ...
A bunch of monitoring functions mostly based on sensors(1)
https://dataswamp.org/~incal/conf/.zsh/tem
I've noticed that the fan speed with Debian is much faster than the fan
speed with Windows 10. I doubt very much that this is because Windows 10
is doing less processing. The fan speed with Windows 10 seems to vary
quite a lot, where as Debian is consistently high when the room
temperature
On 1/21/22 17:07, Grzesiek wrote:
Hi there,
I noticed that all my GPU operate at PCIe 1.1=2.5GHz instead of PCIe
2.0/3.0. Is there any way to force higher speed?
Hardware details below
---===### First system ###===---
CPU: i7-3770, Linux version 5.15.0-2-amd64
# dmesg | grep bandwidth
Hi there,
I noticed that all my GPU operate at PCIe 1.1=2.5GHz instead of PCIe
2.0/3.0. Is there any way to force higher speed?
Hardware details below
---===### First system ###===---
CPU: i7-3770, Linux version 5.15.0-2-amd64
# dmesg | grep bandwidth
[0.224924] pci :01:00.0
On 13.01.22 01:41, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13 Jan 2022 07:33, basti wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> first of all the most modern CPU in the last 10 years (I gues) use so
> called speed-stepping.
>
> As I can see I was wondering why that
Hello,
first of all the most modern CPU in the last 10 years (I gues) use so
called speed-stepping.
As I can see I was wondering why that speed stepping is not set in a KVM
guest, even if I use "host-passthrough" in the cpu config of the guest.
virsh dumpxml almalinux | grep -i cpu
On 11/24/2021 01:04 AM, deloptes wrote:
David wrote:
A few seconds web search finds this:
https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/fvd-speed-dial-stopped-working/39165
also after upgrades since perhaps 1-2 years it is creating new profile by
default and one should go to about:profiles and select
David wrote:
> A few seconds web search finds this:
> https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/fvd-speed-dial-stopped-working/39165
also after upgrades since perhaps 1-2 years it is creating new profile by
default and one should go to about:profiles and select the old one as
default.
BR
--
FCD
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 12:37, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>
> Upgrading Firefox has managed to Disable FVD Speed Dial, as far as I
> know, without warning
>
> Thia leaves me in a position of loosing several hundred web pages that I
> have painfully collected over many years.
Upgrading Firefox has managed to Disable FVD Speed Dial, as far as I
know, without warning
Thia leaves me in a position of loosing several hundred web pages that I
have painfully collected over many years.
Are there any solutions to this problem?
--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D.
www.molecular
On Wed 29 Sep 2021 at 20:49:28 (+0800), kaye n wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 6:46 PM kaye n wrote:
> >> Just to give an update in case anyone is interested.
> >> One of the solutions provided in the link below seems to be effective for
> >> me.
> >>
>
kaye n wrote:
> This is an old thread but I think I may have found the problem and I would
> like to know your opinion.
> As a refresher, my wifi speed on my phone is significantly faster than on
> my 10-year old laptop.
>
> Could this be the reason?
>
> from:
> https
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 6:46 PM kaye n wrote:
>
> Hello friends,
>>
>> Just to give an update in case anyone is interested.
>> One of the solutions provided in the link below seems to be effective for
>> me.
>>
>> https://itsfoss.com/speed-up-slow-wifi-c
> Hello friends,
>
> Just to give an update in case anyone is interested.
> One of the solutions provided in the link below seems to be effective for
> me.
>
> https://itsfoss.com/speed-up-slow-wifi-connection-ubuntu/
>
> "Solution 5: Ditch default network ma
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:35:44 -0500
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
>
> Deities defend us.
> My problem is the complete absence of thought shown by that list
> "server notebook workstation".
> I want to ask him: What is a use-case?
>
> Also to point out that containers too have different use-cases, a
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021, 8:02 AM Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Please do not top-post.
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 07:07:30AM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> > Reading this thread, remembering my annoyance with NetworkManager, I ran
> > across this article by RedHat's NetManager developer Thomas H
Hi.
Please do not top-post.
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 07:07:30AM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> Reading this thread, remembering my annoyance with NetworkManager, I ran
> across this article by RedHat's NetManager developer Thomas Haller. From
> last year. Yes I suppose it's promotional,
gt;> > >
>> > > Actual numbers for all these cases would be more useful than
>> > > reminiscence, so that we can make the comparison.
>>
>> Here, I meant some sort of table of comparison, like:
>>
>> Device connectiondown-speed
uite sure I don't get this much disparity with another Linux
> > > distro,
> > > > as well as in Windows 7.
> > >
> > > Actual numbers for all these cases would be more useful than
> > > reminiscence, so that we can make the comparison.
>
>
s 7.
> >
> > Actual numbers for all these cases would be more useful than
> > reminiscence, so that we can make the comparison.
Here, I meant some sort of table of comparison, like:
Device connectiondown-speed up-speedsite
type
Debian
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 10:23 PM David wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 at 23:51, kaye n wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 6:34 AM David wrote:
> >> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 23:39, kaye n wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:45 PM IL Ka
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >>> Device-1: Broadcom Limited BCM431
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 at 23:51, kaye n wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 6:34 AM David wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 23:39, kaye n wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:45 PM IL Ka wrote:
>>
>> >>> Device-1: Broadcom Limited BCM4313 802.11bgn Wireless Network Adapter
>>
>> >> ok, this is your
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 6:34 AM David wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 23:39, kaye n wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:45 PM IL Ka wrote:
>
> >>> Device-1: Broadcom Limited BCM4313 802.11bgn Wireless Network Adapter
>
> >> ok, this is your card.
>
> >> Lets see output of
> >> $ iw dev [you
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 23:39, kaye n wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:45 PM IL Ka wrote:
>>> Device-1: Broadcom Limited BCM4313 802.11bgn Wireless Network Adapter
>> ok, this is your card.
>> Lets see output of
>> $ iw dev [your_dev_name]
> Pardon me, but what should I type for [your_dev
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 10:18 PM David Wright
wrote:
> inxi -Fdflmnopuv7 (my own incantation) should say something like:
>
>Device-2: Intel Wireless 7260 driver: iwlwifi v: kernel port: 4000 bus
> ID: 02:00.0
>chip ID: 8086:08b2
>IF: wlp2s0 state: up mac: 01:23:45:67:89:ab
>
>
On Mon 05 Apr 2021 at 21:39:16 (+0800), kaye n wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:45 PM IL Ka wrote:
> > Device-1: Broadcom Limited BCM4313 802.11bgn Wireless Network Adapter
> >>
> > ok, this is your card.
> >
> > Lets see output of
> > $ iw dev [your_dev_name]
> > it should be
> > $ iw dev
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:45 PM IL Ka wrote:
> Device-1: Broadcom Limited BCM4313 802.11bgn Wireless Network Adapter
>>
> ok, this is your card.
>
> Lets see output of
> $ iw dev [your_dev_name]
> it should be
> $ iw dev wlan0
> I believe
>
> Also, try to ping your wifi router ip address and
>
> Device-1: Broadcom Limited BCM4313 802.11bgn Wireless Network Adapter
>
ok, this is your card.
Lets see output of
$ iw dev [your_dev_name]
it should be
$ iw dev wlan0
I believe
Also, try to ping your wifi router ip address and some Internet address like
$ ping 8.8.8.8
Then, check https:/
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:05 PM IL Ka wrote:
>
>> Firefox browser in Debian.
>> Internet speed checker is fast.com
>> Speed is 670kbps
>>
>> How do you connect your laptop to the internet? Is it a cable or wifi?
> What NIC are you using?
>
Laptop co
>
>
> Firefox browser in Debian.
> Internet speed checker is fast.com
> Speed is 670kbps
>
> How do you connect your laptop to the internet? Is it a cable or wifi?
What NIC are you using?
Hello Friends!
My laptop, if it matters:
Kernel: 4.19.0-6-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.4
Distro: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
This is a familiar scenario:
Firefox browser in Debian.
Internet speed checker is fast.com
Speed is 670kbps
Built-in browser of Samsung phone
Internet speed
Downstream
>>> >> Bandwidth
>>> >> for each ISP if every time I do a test (for example on www.speedtest.net
>>> >> <http://www.speedtest.net>) I find a different speed that can vary from
>>> >> 2 to
>>> >> 20 Mbps?
>&g
uter only as an access point.
>>
>> Now I'm in doubt as to how I will set the Upstream and Downstream Bandwidth
>> for each ISP if every time I do a test (for example on www.speedtest.net
>> <http://www.speedtest.net>) I find a different speed that can vary from 2 to
'm in doubt as to how I will set the Upstream and Downstream
>> >> Bandwidth
>> >> for each ISP if every time I do a test (for example on www.speedtest.net
>> >> <http://www.speedtest.net> <http://www.speedtest.net>) I find a different
>> >
>>
> >> Now I'm in doubt as to how I will set the Upstream and Downstream Bandwidth
> >> for each ISP if every time I do a test (for example on www.speedtest.net
> >> <http://www.speedtest.net>) I find a different speed that can vary from 2
&g
for each ISP if every time I do a test (for example on www.speedtest.net
<http://www.speedtest.net>) I find a different speed that can vary from 2 to
20 Mbps?
This isn't really a Debian issue, but let me take a stab at it:
Disconnect network A. Run a speed test.
Connect network B,
and Downstream Bandwidth
> for each ISP if every time I do a test (for example on www.speedtest.net
> <http://www.speedtest.net>) I find a different speed that can vary from 2 to
> 20 Mbps?
This isn't really a Debian issue, but let me take a stab at it:
Disconnect network A. Run a
ch ISP if every time I do a test (for example on
www.speedtest.net <http://www.speedtest.net>) I find a different speed
that can vary from 2 to 20 Mbps?
Any guidance?
Thank you,
Akvo
ate: 5700 rpm
>> Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
>> ATA Version is: ACS-2, ACS-3 T13/2161-D revision 3b
>> SATA Version is: SATA 3.1, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)
>> Local Time is: Wed Jan 20 17:12:52 2021 CST
>> SMART support
>> Is it an SMR drive? Interface speed may not be too critical if it is.
>
> WD says it is a CMR drive, and that they are separating the Red
> designations to make it clear to consumers which are SMR and
> which are CMR because people don't like buying SMR by accident,
&
3.1, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)
Local Time is: Wed Jan 20 17:12:52 2021 CST
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
why is the speed 3.0 gbs
i have 4 other drive i have tested with this device and they all use
6.0 gbs
On 2021-01-20 16:36
On Jo, 21 ian 21, 13:12:38, brainf...@posteo.net wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-01-21 12:44 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Jo, 21 ian 21, 12:09:12, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > Mark Allums wrote:
> > > > Is it an SMR drive? Interface speed may not be too critical if it
On 2021-01-21 12:44 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 21 ian 21, 12:09:12, Dan Ritter wrote:
Mark Allums wrote:
> Is it an SMR drive? Interface speed may not be too critical if it is.
WD says it is a CMR drive, and that they are separating the Red
designations to make it clear to consum
On Jo, 21 ian 21, 12:09:12, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Mark Allums wrote:
> > Is it an SMR drive? Interface speed may not be too critical if it is.
>
> WD says it is a CMR drive, and that they are separating the Red
> designations to make it clear to consumers which are SMR and
>
On 21.01.2021 05:36, brainf...@posteo.net wrote:
i guess i'm asking what decides how a device is going to connect
Both host controller and device controller are negotiating for a highest
possible bandwidth.
If a host controller supports speeds up to 3.0Gb only, then device
controller will ope
Mark Allums wrote:
> Is it an SMR drive? Interface speed may not be too critical if it is.
WD says it is a CMR drive, and that they are separating the Red
designations to make it clear to consumers which are SMR and
which are CMR because people don't like buying SMR by accident,
which s
, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)
Local Time is:Wed Jan 20 17:12:52 2021 CST
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
why is the speed 3.0 gbs i have 4 other drive i have tested with this
device and they all use 6.0 gbs
I can't tell you why, bu
SATA Version is: SATA 3.1, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)
> Local Time is:Wed Jan 20 17:12:52 2021 CST
> SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
> SMART support is: Enabled
>
> why is the speed 3.0 gbs i have 4 other drive i have tested with this
> device and
On 2021-01-20 07:26 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
brainf...@posteo.net wrote:
6tb drive at 3.0 gbs
root@hc4:~# hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 406 MB in 3.01 seconds = 134.83 MB/sec
2tb drive at 6.0 gbs
root@hc4:~# hdparm -t /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
Timing buffered disk re
brainf...@posteo.net wrote:
>
> 6tb drive at 3.0 gbs
> root@hc4:~# hdparm -t /dev/sda
>
> /dev/sda:
> Timing buffered disk reads: 406 MB in 3.01 seconds = 134.83 MB/sec
>
>
> 2tb drive at 6.0 gbs
> root@hc4:~# hdparm -t /dev/sdb
>
> /dev/sdb:
> Timing buffered disk reads: 436 MB in 3.00
On 2021-01-20 06:44 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
brainf...@posteo.net composed on 2021-01-20 17:21 (UTC-0600):
i bought a new harddrive
western digital red plus 6tb
...
Model Family: Western Digital Red
Device Model: WDC WD60EFRX-68L0BN1
...
why is the speed 3.0 gbs
i have 4 other
brainf...@posteo.net composed on 2021-01-20 17:21 (UTC-0600):
> i bought a new harddrive
> western digital red plus 6tb
...
> Model Family: Western Digital Red
> Device Model: WDC WD60EFRX-68L0BN1
...
> why is the speed 3.0 gbs
> i have 4 other drive i have tested wi
On 2021-01-20 06:17 PM, deloptes wrote:
brainf...@posteo.net wrote:
why is the speed 3.0 gbs
i have 4 other drive i have tested with this device and they all use
6.0 gbs
check cables, connectors and controller - here 2TB WD20EFRX is on LSI
that
supports only SATA 2
this device is a
3 T13/2161-D revision 3b
> SATA Version is: SATA 3.1, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)
> Local Time is:Wed Jan 20 17:12:52 2021 CST
> SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
> SMART support is: Enabled
>
> why is the speed 3.0 gbs
> i have 4 other drive i h
brainf...@posteo.net wrote:
> why is the speed 3.0 gbs
> i have 4 other drive i have tested with this device and they all use
> 6.0 gbs
check cables, connectors and controller - here 2TB WD20EFRX is on LSI that
supports only SATA 2
:Wed Jan 20 17:12:52 2021 CST
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
why is the speed 3.0 gbs
i have 4 other drive i have tested with this device and they all use
6.0 gbs
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 05:09:47PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
Michael Stone (12020-12-23):
No, network speeds are traditionally measured in bits because networks
transferred data in bits and telcos dealt with bits, and they sold and
billed bits. Computer internals were measured in bytes and wo
a file full of zeros will skew
results for that sort of application.
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 11:06:50AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
I was rather referring to real use ;)
Speed tests under optimized conditions do have their purpose (e.g. is my
network interface working properly?[1]), but they mig
*between* the PCs, rather than in them.
>
> Common sense would dictate against using SD cards etc for testing
> network speeds (unless, say, you were using such files), because you
> obviously want to reduce to a minimum the number of points of weakness
> (ie slowness), testing the
res. (For the same reason, structural wiring
> > using brown for the telephone sockets will have the same problem.)
>
> Let's not forget the source and destination storage (connection).
>
> Even if the Gigabit (per second) interface on the PINE A64+ performs
> pretty well
On 12/23/20 2:55 AM, mick crane wrote:
hello,
I have a buster PC and a bullseye PC which are both supposed to have
gigabyte network cards connected via a little Gigabyte switch box.
Transferring files between them, I forget which shows the transfer
speed per file, either scp or rsync the
not forget the source and destination storage (connection).
Even if the Gigabit (per second) interface on the PINE A64+ performs
pretty well, a transfer larger that can fit in any buffers that might be
involved will quickly be slowed down to the speed of the SD card and/or
interface, respectively
On Wed 23 Dec 2020 at 16:47:21 (+0200), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 23 dec 20, 10:56:36, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Andy Smith (12020-12-23):
> > > "gigabyte" is not a network speed. You probably mean gigabit
> >
> > No, gigabit is 10³ bits,
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 12:13:19AM +0800, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
Getting back to the original question, rsync is inherently slower
because both ends do deep file inspection and handshaking to decide
what data transfer is required. scp is usually faster.
If you're rsyncing to a non-existent desti
On 23/12/20 11:51 pm, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 11:37:07PM +0800, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
I did some tests and found there was around a 10-20% difference in speed
between runs.
Yes, if you want more consistent numbers you'd need much larger test
file sizes; if the tra
Michael Stone (12020-12-23):
> No, network speeds are traditionally measured in bits because networks
> transferred data in bits and telcos dealt with bits, and they sold and
> billed bits. Computer internals were measured in bytes and words because
> they transferred data in bytes and words. Some
Andrei POPESCU (12020-12-23):
> I took that to mean the theoretical maximum.
Not just that. Network protocols have many layers, and each layers adds
overhead. The rates are given at the lowest level, sometimes ATM,
therefore the usable rate at the application levels are significantly
lower.
Regar
1 - 100 of 1344 matches
Mail list logo
