On Thu 24 Oct 2024 at 20:34:18 (-0400), e...@gmx.us wrote:
> On 10/24/24 20:01, David Wright wrote:
> > Because of the ownership:
> >
> >    $ ls -l /var/cache/apt/archives/
> >    total 4
> >    -rw-r----- 1 root root    0 Apr 16  2022 lock
> >    drwx------ 2 _apt root 4096 Oct 22 19:00 partial
> >    $
> >
> > we can assume that _apt is the user that actually downloads packages
> > (into partial/) before APT installs them. But your assumption that
> > tmp_sh can be read by any user (including _apt) is wrong: you need
> > execute permission on all directories traversed along the path, even
> > when you “know what you're looking for”.

Apologies ditto.

> Fair enough.  Should I chmod a+x /root/.synaptic/tmp then, or is there a
> nicer way?

Not using synaptic, I don't know why that path was chosen. But
you'd need world-execute all the way down from /root itself.

When I install yt-dlp, being lazy I download the package from
packages.debian.org, choosing the most recent version, typically
trixie's. I store it under /home/debian/trixie (or whatever), and
  # apt-get install full-path
I consider this safe, and ignore the warning that's issued. IIRC,
my warning starts with "N: Download is performed … ".

I do this because I'm too lazy to change my sources.list, and
that has the side-effect that I can't accidentally install any
non-stable packages by way of Depends/Recommends/Suggests.

In the past I have placed packages in /var/cache/apt/archives/,
but I'm not sure whether I used apt-get with a full path,
or dpkg -i; it was so long ago.

> Also, I've been running synaptic as "sudo synaptic" and this is the first
> time I've got that message.

Well, I'll admit that I'm mystified as to what the 283682-byte file
called tmp_sh actually is, and how it was obtained.

> I used to do "synaptic-pkexec" but it would ask
> me for my password each time I ran it, whereas with sudo if I ran it from
> the same terminal again within a few minutes, my previous authentication was
> good enough.

What I've never resolved is under what circumstances does
  # apt-get install full-path
copy full-path via /var/cache/apt/archives/partial/ into
/var/cache/apt/archives/, leaving the copy in the cache,
and install it from there; or just install it directly
from full-path without all the copying. But I suspect that:
. performing the copying step ⇒ no warning,
. installing directly ⇒ warning issued.

Cheers,
David.

Reply via email to