ll
> > > Debian on these machines, upgrade, remove packages... while
> > > sharing /usr/share between all the machines, and /usr between all the
> > > machines of a given arch?
> >
> > I asked this a few months ago about /usr/share -- I have several
> > m
how would I install
> > Debian on these machines, upgrade, remove packages... while
> > sharing /usr/share between all the machines, and /usr between all the
> > machines of a given arch?
> >
> > Best regards, Thibaut.
> > Note: my question is out of curiosity
tectures.
> [1] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
>
> What would be the preferred way for doing such things under Debian?
> Assume I have several i386 boxes and a few sparcs, how would I install
> Debian on these machines, upgrade, remove packages... while
> sharing /usr/share between a
things under Debian?
Assume I have several i386 boxes and a few sparcs, how would I install
Debian on these machines, upgrade, remove packages... while
sharing /usr/share between all the machines, and /usr between all the
machines of a given arch?
Best regards, Thibaut.
Note: my question is out of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FHS says that /usr is sharable, read-only data. And that /usr/share
is sharable even across architectures.
I suppose you mean Filesystem Hierarchy Standard.
Now suppose I have a network of Debian machines, whose packages are
all maintained and regularly upgrade
The FHS says that /usr is sharable, read-only data. And that /usr/share
is sharable even across architectures.
Now suppose I have a network of Debian machines, whose packages are
all maintained and regularly upgraded with aptitude. Presumably,
each machine would have a different set of pack
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 06:54:59PM +0100, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> Or am I going at this the wrong way - is NFS'ing the whole of /usr not a
> Good Thing?
> If so, what's the solution that results in a global /usr for the
> clients?
I looked at this same idea a couple months back (check the archi
From: nico de haer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What would happen if you 'just' installed a deb on all pc's ? worst
case:
> they write the same file to /usr a few times. Best part: all pc's fix
their
> own /etc and related stuff. (do note: this is an idea, not something
i've
> tried)
Well, ideally I'
Hi all-
I'm NFS sharing /usr from one box to a number of other, with the aim of
having only to do one apt update to the server machine (when I finally
get my 28.8 modem working ... :-) and so as not to waste disk space on
the client machines.
I'd just like to know what anyone el
9 matches
Mail list logo