On Lu, 20 mai 13, 23:06:29, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 23:19 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > You are of course aware of debian-user-german, or not?
>
> I don't know the German mailing list. I know some good German forums,
> but international lists and forums simply provide a
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 23:19 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 20 mai 13, 13:34:55, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> >
> > Oh, I never doubted that you were imprecise. I was imprecise, maybe I
> > cannotz
> > express myself in English as well as in my mother language German. I excuse
> > for that!
>
On Lu, 20 mai 13, 13:34:55, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
>
> Oh, I never doubted that you were imprecise. I was imprecise, maybe I cannotz
> express myself in English as well as in my mother language German. I excuse
> for that!
You are of course aware of debian-user-german, or not?
Kind regards,
An
On Lu, 20 mai 13, 12:49:21, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> Oh, disagree with me all you like - but be cautious about disagreeing with
> Andrei!
Please, you make it sound like I'm from the Romanian mafia or something
:p
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discuss
On Monday 20 May 2013 12:34:55 Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> > Andrei is one of the most knowledgeable and helpful of the people on this
> > list. He is also very experienced.
> >
> > You appear to be relatively new to
> > Debian.
>
> Ahem, no, I am not new to debian.
Sorry. :-( Mea culpa.
> Bu
Hi Lisi!
>
> It does. The lower pinning is to prevent backports from upgrading your
> whole installation. If you install from Stable and do not change your
> sources.list, upgrades will only be taken from Stable. To repeat what I
> said earlier, packages from backports _and_ _only_ packages fro
On Monday 20 May 2013 11:05:53 Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Dear Andrei
>
> > Dear Hans-J, could you please clarify your terminology? What do you mean
> > by 'automatically update' in above paragraph? Which one of the following
> > do you mean:
> >
> > 1. I have version 1 and expected version 2~bpo fr
Dear Andrei
> Dear Hans-J, could you please clarify your terminology? What do you mean
> by 'automatically update' in above paragraph? Which one of the following
> do you mean:
>
> 1. I have version 1 and expected version 2~bpo from backports
> to be installed
What I meant was "I have bla-3.0
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 11:40 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> As per default configuration of backports (priority 100) 1 will *not*
> happen unless you use '-t backports', but 2 will.
More information about priorities can be found at
http://wiki.debian.org/AptPreferences ->
http://wiki.debian.org/B
On Monday 20 May 2013 08:21:59 Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 19. Mai 2013 schrieb Lisi Reisz:
> > On Sunday 19 May 2013 17:05:40 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > Your backported packages, _and_ _only_ your backported
> > > packages will be updated from wheezy-backports.
> >
> > Sorry, upgraded.
> >
On Lu, 20 mai 13, 09:21:59, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
>
> no they did not. I thought, libreoffice would automaticallly update, as
> wheezy-
> backports was in my sources.list. But although the packagaes appeared in
> aptitude, they won't update automatically. So I did it manually.
Dear Hans-J, cou
Am Sonntag, 19. Mai 2013 schrieb Lisi Reisz:
> On Sunday 19 May 2013 17:05:40 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > Your backported packages, _and_ _only_ your backported
> > packages will be updated from wheezy-backports.
>
> Sorry, upgraded.
>
> Lisi
Hi Lisi,
no they did not. I thought, libreoffice would au
On 20/05/13 03:01, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> and then "apt-get upgrade libreoffice-* | grep installed" or some similar
Note: Untested.
I think
# aptitude install '?name(libreoffice)?installed'
would do approximately that?
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian
On Du, 19 mai 13, 17:01:51, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> >
> > Normally a package has to be in testing first and only then backported
> > (to ensure some testing). The package in backports has a special version
> > so that apt/dpkg always consider the package in testing to be newer
> > (even if the so
On Sunday 19 May 2013 17:05:40 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Your backported packages, _and_ _only_ your backported
> packages will be updated from wheezy-backports.
Sorry, upgraded.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On Sunday 19 May 2013 16:01:51 Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> > > But I guess, there is an easier way, to update my ONLY my installed
> > > packages out of wheezy. In the wiki I read, you can use apt-get -t
> > > wheezy-backports install $package, which worked well.
> >
> > Not sure what you mean here, c
Hi Andrei,
> > But I guess, there is an easier way, to update my ONLY my installed
> > packages out of wheezy. In the wiki I read, you can use apt-get -t
> > wheezy-backports install $package, which worked well.
>
> Not sure what you mean here, could you please rephrase/elaborate?
>
No, not qui
On Du, 19 mai 13, 11:39:30, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I wanted to install LO4 in wheezy. I wondered, why it is in wheezy-backports
> but not in testing. Maybe the packages in wheezy-backports are too young for
> testing?
>
> However, I managed it by using aptitude and made sure,
On Du, 19 mai 13, 11:30:50, theart...@zoho.com wrote:
>
> As a different question, could anyone please tell me why
> wheezy-backports is not showing up on packages.debian.org?
No, but we can ask the people taking care of it ;)
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Of
Hi Hans,
If you want to see why a certain package version has not yet made it
from unstable into testing, you can go to:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/
replacing with the name of package in question.
Looking at the page for libreoffice[1], under "testing migration" you
can see the point
Hello all,
I wanted to install LO4 in wheezy. I wondered, why it is in wheezy-backports
but not in testing. Maybe the packages in wheezy-backports are too young for
testing?
However, I managed it by using aptitude and made sure, all dependencies are
correct.
But I guess, there is an easier w
- - wrote:
> Thank you for your very good explanation! I could not find anything
> nearly as good as this in the internet!
But that message is now on the internet. :-)
> Another question came up while reading your message:
> Wouldn't it then be better to give ownership of '/usr/local/var/lib/cher
kee (or any other software) would be access to files the
service should not care about?
I would be happy if you would clarify.
Kind Regards
- S.
- Original Message -
From: Bob Proulx
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:41 AM
Subject: Re: Several
- - wrote:
> it's the first time I am not using Debian packages and
> I have several questions regarding the correct use of
> paths and permissions. Cherokee runs under www-data:www-data.
I have no experience with Cherokee but let me try to help with the
issues and questions in
Hello,
it's the first time I am not using Debian packages and
I have several questions regarding the correct use of
paths and permissions. Cherokee runs under www-data:www-data.
I build Cherokee Web Server from source and there are
some differences between that and the package installatio
Nayyar Ahmed wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 08:38:14 -0500, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
spencer ward wrote:
Hi,
Last week I installed Debian for the first time
and now I would like to update my system.
My first question is when I try to sign on
in the debian gui pop up I get the messag
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 08:38:14 -0500, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> spencer ward wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >Last week I installed Debian for the first time
> >and now I would like to update my system.
> >My first question is when I try to sign on
> >in the debian gui pop up I get the message
> >tha
spencer ward wrote:
Hi,
Last week I installed Debian for the first time
and now I would like to update my system.
My first question is when I try to sign on
in the debian gui pop up I get the message
that root can't use that window to sign on.
Why is that and how can I over come that?
Debian doe
-- Forwarded message --
From: kernel.linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 17:52:30 +0500
Subject: Re: Several questions.
To: spencer ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 04:43:01 -0400, spencer ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Last
Hi,
Last week I installed Debian for the first time
and now I would like to update my system.
My first question is when I try to sign on
in the debian gui pop up I get the message
that root can't use that window to sign on.
Why is that and how can I over come that?
I would now like to update my des
From: "b3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 7:52 AM
> Subject: Re: Several questions
>
>
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:47:59AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > How do I install KDE (if
Will the packages you mentioned below for kde 2.1 install on potato without
any problem?
Thanks,
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "b3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 7:52 AM
Subject: Re: Several questions
> On T
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:47:59AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I install KDE (if it?s a good idea to do so)?
If you're tracking unstable, the commands are:
apt-get update
apt-get install task-kde
This *should* install KDE 2.1, which is, IMHO, rather slick.
> Is there any command I
How do I install KDE (if it´s a good idea to do so)?
Is there any command I can use to know which C compilers I have
installed?
Thank you very much.
Consigue tu cuenta gratuita de acceso a internet y de correo en
http://www.navega
Hi people,
I need some help from the make-kpkg hackers... I learned enough about
make-kpkg to be able to use flavoured version numbers (I'm attaching
the script to do that below, as make-kpkg's docs aren't very clear on
that point) but there's something else that I want to do that may
involve deep
pine 4.x is good, the main reason to upgrade is it supports html based
email, which if you communicate with people with stupid mail clients that
use html(curses it silently) you won't have to kill them if they email you
something you cant read :/
nate
[mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Todd Suess wrote:
> #2 I saw several messages refer to newer source/etc for
> Pine, I am running 3.96 but if 4.xx is floating around out
> there somewhere, could someone point me in the right direction
> to find it? Sounds like it adds some
Monday, October 11, 1999, 4:15:36 PM, Todd wrote:
> is find and good, because I can now use the built in kill command
> in bash for various things, but I did have to fix the poff script
> for ppp, because it broke when /bin/kill because /bin/skill.
> Just in case anyone else had the same problem an
Greetings Fellow Debian Enthusiasts,
I had a number of questions I have pondered all week, and thought
perhaps someone might know the answer. Any help is most
apprieciated.
#1 After upgrading my slink box to potato a week or 2 ago,
I started getting the following error every time I install a
n
buns wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> 1st q. -
>
> A couple of months ago I did a fresh install of hamm stable and I have
> been experiencing character weirdness (basically unintelligible
> characters) appearing at my terminal when (not all the time though) I
> switch from x-windows to terminal screen. The pro
Hi
1st q. -
A couple of months ago I did a fresh install of hamm stable and I have
been experiencing character weirdness (basically unintelligible
characters) appearing at my terminal when (not all the time though) I
switch from x-windows to terminal screen. The problem does not appear in
the x-t
Hi!
Matthew A. Reklau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Do the X servers include support for the Diamond Viper V330?
yes, they do. Some month ago I installed debian pre-hamm on a box with one.
Rainer
--
KeyID=58341901 fingerprint=A5 57 04 B3 69 88 A1 FB 78 1D B5 64 E0 BF 72 EB
--
Unsubscribe? ma
On 6 Aug 98 04:23:09 GMT, in linux.debian.user you wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 05, 1998 at 11:53:34PM -0400, Matthew A. Reklau wrote:
>
>> Do the X servers include support for the Diamond Viper V330?
>>
>Dunno, but I think so. Debian's X software is Xfree86 3.3.2, so if Xfree86
>supports it, Debian supp
On Wed, Aug 05, 1998 at 11:53:34PM -0400, Matthew A. Reklau wrote:
> I do not subscribe to this list and do not currently run Debian. Before I
> run Debian I want to know:
>
> What kernel version does the current Debian 2.0 come with?
>
2.0.34
> What support is included for Fat 32?
>
kernel 2.0
I do not subscribe to this list and do not currently run Debian. Before I
run Debian I want to know:
What kernel version does the current Debian 2.0 come with?
What support is included for Fat 32?
Do the X servers include support for the Diamond Viper V330?
If I can get acceptable answers to t
Hello,
I have debian-hamm as of Dec. 19, (everything is libc6) installed.
I cannot seem to get X to work when I am not root.
It tells me that only root can run the server.
I thought that there might be something wrong with permissions, so
I reinstalled x-server-s3v. It installed OK with one error
Hello,
as of this Sunday I downloaded and updated almost of my
packages that now compiled with gnulibc6 (with exception
of X11 stuff).
I ran into a couple of problems and am not sure if I caused them.
1. After installing ldso, libc6, I installed libreadline2 -- that
some how deleted a link to my
47 matches
Mail list logo
