On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:59:49AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:33:44AM +0200, Stephan Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:43:41PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > >On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:24:20PM +0200, Steph
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:33:44AM +0200, Stephan Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:43:41PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:24:20PM +0200, Stephan Seitz
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Testing the situation on two other machines (one
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:24:20PM +0200, Stephan Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> CCing the libxml2 maintainer list.
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:45:45PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
>> I have a problem with testing (32bit, i386): Since the update of libxml2
>> to version 2.6.30.dfsg-2 openof
Hi
When I installed abs-guide package, the documentation comes in html
format. However I like to have the abs-book in pdf format. So I unzipped
the /usr/share/doc/abs-guide/abs-book.sgml.gz to abs-book.sgml. Then I
tried to convert the sgml file into a pdf one by doing
$docbook2pdf abs
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 10:07:53PM -0500, David Z Maze wrote:
> Brian Potkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc/texmf is your rather overwhelming starting
> > point. Diving into latex/general gets you what you want.
>
> You can use the 'texdoc' tool to conveniently read a f
Brian Potkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc/texmf is your rather overwhelming starting
> point. Diving into latex/general gets you what you want.
You can use the 'texdoc' tool to conveniently read a file in this
tree. For a good beginner's reference, I'd recommend "The No
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:14:58PM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
> pretzalz@Pretzalz:~$ apt-cache search sgml-tools
> linuxdoc-tools - SGML converters for the LinuxDoc DTD only.
>
>
> What distro are you using, I can't find the dummy package in either
> testing or unsta
Brian Potkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 09:59:39AM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
I just downloaded and installed Lyx using aptitude on a Sarge system.
The package recommends also installing 'sgml-tools' which, from its
name, sounds like a good idea, but the search function i
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 09:59:39AM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I just downloaded and installed Lyx using aptitude on a Sarge system.
> The package recommends also installing 'sgml-tools' which, from its
> name, sounds like a good idea, but the search function in aptitu
wrote:
> I just downloaded and installed Lyx using aptitude on a Sarge system.
> The package recommends also installing 'sgml-tools' which, from its
> name, sounds like a good idea, but the search function in aptitude
> cannot find a package of that name. Where might I find
I just downloaded and installed Lyx using aptitude on a Sarge system.
The package recommends also installing 'sgml-tools' which, from its
name, sounds like a good idea, but the search function in aptitude
cannot find a package of that name. Where might I find it?
Also, I am a begin
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 05:43:48PM -0500, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> Package gnome-terminal seems to depend (transitively) on a lot things.
>
> Is it really supposed to require installing packages such as docbookxml,
> libxslt, and sgml-data?
Welcome to scrollkeeper ...
--
Package gnome-terminal seems to depend (transitively) on a lot things.
Is it really supposed to require installing packages such as docbookxml,
libxslt, and sgml-data?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel Barclay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 22:58, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Abdul Latip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Greetings:
> >
> > I am currently considering to use lyx as a standard
> > document processor. Unfortunately, it uses "non-free"
> > packages as well as "Type 3 Fonts" (what's that, btw?).
>
>
Abdul Latip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I am currently considering to use lyx as a standard
> document processor. Unfortunately, it uses "non-free"
> packages as well as "Type 3 Fonts" (what's that, btw?).
The non-free XForms package will soon be in main, as will Lyx.
[Sorry f
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 16:03, Rogerio Acquadro wrote:
> So I think that´s a better
> idea to use the linuxdoc dtd.
> Where can I found the documentation for tags under linuxdoc? Is it
apt-get install linuxdoc-tools
view /usr/share/doc/linuxdoc-tools/guide.sgml.gz
and /usr/share/doc/linuxdo
?
Anybody has a book for example, for me to see the sgml source?
Thanks a lot!
--
::: .''`. ::: Rogerio Acquadro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
::: : :' : ::: ICQ UIN: 6543753
::: `. `'` ::: Administrador de rede - CCS - UNICAMP
::: `-::: http://w
Hi,
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 04:38:29PM -0400, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:33:42PM -0300, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
> > > Hi all.
> > >
> > > I'm looking for help (for newbies) on us
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:33:42PM -0300, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I'm looking for help (for newbies) on using debiandoc-sgml.
> > The problem is that I want to write documents in spanish, and i
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:33:42PM -0300, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm looking for help (for newbies) on using debiandoc-sgml.
> The problem is that I want to write documents in spanish, and i don't
> know how, because the dtd's control entities and tags
Eduardo Gargiulo escreveu:
Hi all.
I'm looking for help (for newbies) on using debiandoc-sgml.
The problem is that I want to write documents in spanish, and i don't
know how, because the dtd's control entities and tags are all in
english.
Usually straightforward translations
Hi all.
I'm looking for help (for newbies) on using debiandoc-sgml.
The problem is that I want to write documents in spanish, and i don't
know how, because the dtd's control entities and tags are all in
english.
Is there someone in the list that could help me? hints about good
willing to run TeX to get cross-references right,
# if you subtract by 3
#MAX_TEX_RECURSION := 6 # Adam uses 6, I just bumped numbrer bigger
MAX_TEX_RECURSION := 9
$(MANUAL).%.texinfo: $(MANUAL).%.sgml date.ent dynamic.%.ent
debiandoc2texinfo -l $* $<
# Buggy, Top must b
"OA" == Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
OA> Adam Di Carlo, (boot-floppies mainatiner) responded back
OA> to me confirming that LATEX instability (bi-stable state)
OA> exists and debiandoc2latexpdf's persisting problem with
OA> this. He does max. 6 level recursive call in hi
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 02:39:19PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Thanks Julien Beans. This seems to be a problem with Latex.
>
> (I acccidentally erased your messasge, so I am responding to my original
> posting.)
>
> Adam Di Carlo, (boot-floppies mainatiner) responded back to me
> confirming that
debiandoc processing. In potato, it is simple but I am
confused for Woody.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:42:13AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> More info:
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:38:26PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >
> > When I try to compile large Debiandoc SGML to PS or PD
I know little about sgml, but something about TeX
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:42:13AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> Appendix A.
> [149] [150]
> Appendix B.
> [151]
> Overfull \hbox (142.97896pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 7339--7341
> []\T1/ptm/m/n/10.95 The orig-i-nal S
More info:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:38:26PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> When I try to compile large Debiandoc SGML to PS or PDF, LATEX fails
> due to error.
>
> Source compiles no problem with text or html.
>
> It lo
On Wednesday 13 February 2002 07:37, Cameron Kerr wrote:
> Odd, that's the second message in a `Chinese' character set that was in
> English (and therefore went into the deleted folder). Is gb2312 used for
> anything else than Chinese? (any _non_ English?). Keep in mind the message
> was sent by a
Odd, that's the second message in a `Chinese' character set that was in
English (and therefore went into the deleted folder). Is gb2312 used for
anything else than Chinese? (any _non_ English?). Keep in mind the message
was sent by a French national.
Cameron Kerr
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://homep
also worth noting is the LaTeX word processor called LyX, which also
supports DocBook export and several generic tex styles
it can produce pdf and if you export to docbook sgml you can still use
those tools too
lyx is still a little unstable in woody, if you open the user manual as
anyone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 1. (*) text/plain ( ) text/html
(Please post in plain text only, no need to send HTML mail...)
> Latex and sgml are all widely used in linux documentation world, but
> who can tell me which one is the best and which one will be the best
* linuxman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
>
> hi,
>
> Latex and sgml are all widely used in linux documentation world, but who can
> tell me which one is the best and which one will be the best in the future?
A psychic? If current trends are anything to go by, in the future
t
On Tuesday 12 February 2002 15:00, linuxman wrote:
> hi,
>
> Latex and sgml are all widely used in linux documentation world, but who
> can tell me which one is the best and which one will be the best in the
> future?
> Thanks!
>
> linuxman
> =
>
uxdoc have xml versions.
I've heard that people writing about math still prefer tex.
On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 15:00, linuxman wrote:
> hi,
>
> Latex and sgml are all widely used in linux documentation world, but who can
> tell me which one is the best and which one will be
hi,
Latex and sgml are all widely used in linux documentation
world, but who can tell me which one is the best and which one will be the best
in the future?
Thanks!
linuxman=Linux is all my
life
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.23.0203 +0100]:
> more to come, probably.
- how do you reference a file on the filesystem to be used for more info
(/usr/share/doc//README)
- say the program has an interactive prompt, how do you classify
commands that can be entered at
hi,
in an effort to finally get my first package to my dear sponsor, i am
going through the horrors of writing a manpage. and of course i want to
do so with SGML and docbook-to-man.
i have a couple of quick questions, please try to be swift with your
answer ;_). i really tried to find online docs
On Thursday, 06. Dec. 2001 at 11:15:30, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> many documents in debian are written in SGML.
> What's the recommended way to read them?
Hello Matus,
install the package "linuxdoc-tools" and you can convert the sgml
documents to many other formats.
Hello,
many documents in debian are written in SGML.
What's the recommended way to read them?
-> "J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-> > which is the easiest way to read formatted sgml docs in potato?
->
-> SGML is a language in which you can
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:31:58 +0100, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> which is the easiest way to read formatted sgml docs in potato?
SGML is a language in which you can define the structure documents must
conform by writing DTDs == document type definitions. Well-known DTDs are
those for H
Hello,
which is the easiest way to read formatted sgml docs in potato?
I haven't found any simple sgml viewer, there are only formaters to other
formats.
I am not member of debian-user please Cc: me or reply directly
--
Matus "fantomas" Uhlar, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://
on Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 11:38:52PM +, Hereward Cooper ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > What's "fully working"?
>
> ok, just working then.
>
> > For an authoring tool, my recommendation is psgmltools under
> > emacs.
>
> Got it! The problems com
> What's "fully working"?
ok, just working then.
> For an authoring tool, my recommendation is psgmltools under
> emacs.
Got it! The problems come in the validation and filtering of
SGML i've written.
> If you're doing DocBook, there's a set o
on Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 06:22:23PM +, Hereward Cooper ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Firstly i'm told this is meant to be a highly controversial subject
> and may start a flame war, am i right?
>
> What's the easiest (and hopeful best) way of getting sgml
Hi,
Firstly i'm told this is meant to be a highly controversial
subject and may start a flame war, am i right?
What's the easiest (and hopeful best) way of getting sgml
working fully under debian. I just can't under stand what on
earth is going on, or what it is trying to d
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I could provide the source to show you how, if you want.
I would like to see the source, if you're willing to post it or send
it by e-mail.
--
Steven E. Harris:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG :: 0x70248E67
"David Z. Maze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DZM> with Jade are at http://www.mit.edu/~dmaze/projects.html. The end
> DZM> result is visible at http://web.mit.edu/resume/.
> No, the address I posted really is correct.
Except that it doesn't work (from wget or mozilla, at least):
[14:30:58]
Brian Potkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BP> On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:15:39AM -0400, David Z. Maze wrote:
DZM> I have my resume in SGML; links to the DTD and DSSSL stylesheets I use
DZM> with Jade are at http://www.mit.edu/~dmaze/projects.html. The end
DZM> result
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:15:39AM -0400, David Z. Maze wrote:
> I have my resume in SGML; links to the DTD and DSSSL stylesheets I use
> with Jade are at http://www.mit.edu/~dmaze/projects.html. The end
> result is visible at http://web.mit.edu/resume/.
Shouldn't the secon
David Monarres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DM> I know that this isn't neccesarily debian specific, but I was
DM> looking for a dtd or latex package that I could use to create a
DM> resume.
I have my resume in SGML; links to the DTD and DSSSL stylesheets I use
with Jade are a
David Monarres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I know that this isn't neccesarily debian specific, but I was looking for a
> dtd or latex package that I could use to create a resume.
FWIW, I didn't like any of the resume packages and built my own up in
the article cls, with a bit of hand-formatting
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 10:43:59AM +0100, Brian Potkin wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 11:25:23PM -0700, David Monarres wrote:
>
> > I know that this isn't neccesarily debian specific, but I was looking for a
> > dtd or latex package that I could use to create a resume. I know that it is
...
> If
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 11:25:23PM -0700, David Monarres wrote:
> I know that this isn't neccesarily debian specific, but I was looking for a
> dtd or latex package that I could use to create a resume. I know that it is
> probably true that everybody uses word proccessors for this type of task,
>
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 11:25:23PM -0700, David Monarres wrote:
> I know that this isn't neccesarily debian specific, but I was looking for a
> dtd or latex package that I could use to create a resume. I know that it is
> probably true that everybody uses word proccessors for this type of task,
> b
I know that this isn't neccesarily debian specific, but I was looking for a
dtd or latex package that I could use to create a resume. I know that it is
probably true that everybody uses word proccessors for this type of task,
but I have been writing papers with latex for the past year and it just
l
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 12:37:20 +, Robin Collins wrote:
> This is crazy, but I can't find out how to print .sgml files.
The short answer is: you don't print them.
The longer answer is: SGML files contain structured documents; they do not
contain any layout information.
This is crazy, but I can't find out how to print .sgml files. I installed
the debian-sgml package and got a raft of files installed but just _WHAT_
is it that I do to print a file?
I tried using man sgml to no avail, looked for all *sgml* in /usr/bin but
only found three utilities, and now
Hi,
I have a computer software manual written in sgml using Docbook.
Now, in one of my latex documents, I would like to include this sgml
manual as an appendix of my latex document. But I don't know how to do
it.
I can only convert sgml to jadetex, but not latex, so I cannot just use
la
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 13:36:45 +0100, Kai Weber wrote:
> I just installed the task-sgml package for learning and using sgml. But
> where do I start? There is no hint from where I should start learning
> the sgml syntax and so on.
http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~jdassen/onderwijs/st
Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TG> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 01:36:45PM +0100, Kai Weber wrote:
KW> I just installed the task-sgml package for learning and using sgml. But
KW> where do I start? There is no hint from where I should start learning
KW> the sgml syntax
* "Daniel" == Daniel Freedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel> You can find more info (including free online copy of an
Daniel> O'reilly book on the subject) at:
Daniel> http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/
Also, a guide how to use emacs with psgml mode is available at
http://www.snee.com/bob/s
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 01:36:45PM +0100, Kai Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed the task-sgml package for learning and using sgml. But
> where do I start? There is no hint from where I should start learning
> the sgml syntax and so on.
>
> Any tips for me?
Start lear
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Kai Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed the task-sgml package for learning and using sgml. But
> where do I start? There is no hint from where I should start learning
> the sgml syntax and so on.
>
> Any tips for me?
Well, a popular DTD (documen
Hi,
I just installed the task-sgml package for learning and using sgml. But
where do I start? There is no hint from where I should start learning
the sgml syntax and so on.
Any tips for me?
Kai.
--
+ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] + http://www.tu-ilmenau.de/~bond/
Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> I'm looking at the wine documentation directory, and half the files
Mark> seem to be sgml ones. How do you read them? Do you need to run a
Mark> utility to convert them to latex or something?
In general, you need a tool capable
>>>>> "MP" == Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MP> I'm looking at the wine documentation directory, and half the
MP> files seem to be sgml ones. How do you read them? Do you
MP> need to run a utility to convert them to lat
I'm looking at the wine documentation directory, and half the files
seem to be sgml ones. How do you read them? Do you need to run a
utility to convert them to latex or something?
Thanks,
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Johann Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 11:18:27AM +, Tony wrote:
> > ^
> > ^"Eric G . Miller" wrote:
> > ^
> > ^> really slick and well formatted documents. And for writing something
> > ^> like a thesis, using BibTeX makes it easy to handle c
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 11:18:27AM +, Tony wrote:
> ^
> ^"Eric G . Miller" wrote:
> ^
> ^> really slick and well formatted documents. And for writing something
> ^> like a thesis, using BibTeX makes it easy to handle citations.
> ^
> ^Yes.
> ^
> ^Latex + bibtex + Emacs + AUCTeX + bib-cite + Re
Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> Yes, I basically agree with that, but getting the document into
|> html as well as ps I have found to be a bore. Last time I tried
|> latex2html on a 100,000 word tex document, it died miserably. Are
|> there better alternatives for producing html from complex l
^
^"Eric G . Miller" wrote:
^
^> really slick and well formatted documents. And for writing something
^> like a thesis, using BibTeX makes it easy to handle citations.
^
^Yes.
^
^Latex + bibtex + Emacs + AUCTeX + bib-cite + RefTeX + font-latex
^
^Good stuff.
^--
Yes, I basically agree with that,
"Eric G . Miller" wrote:
> really slick and well formatted documents. And for writing something
> like a thesis, using BibTeX makes it easy to handle citations.
Yes.
Latex + bibtex + Emacs + AUCTeX + bib-cite + RefTeX + font-latex
Good stuff.
--
Peter Galbraith, research scientist <
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:03:44PM +1000, Shao Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
> Recently, I have read a lot about SGML. It gives me the
> impression that it is very hard to learn and very very
> powerfull.
I haven't found it so hard to learn (like DocBook) as getting de
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:03:44PM +1000, Shao Zhang wrote
> Hi,
> Recently, I have read a lot about SGML. It gives me the
> impression that it is very hard to learn and very very
> powerfull.
>
> However, I still don't have a clue that
Hi,
Recently, I have read a lot about SGML. It gives me the
impression that it is very hard to learn and very very
powerfull.
However, I still don't have a clue that in what circumstances I
should use SGML instead of others. Should I write a t
John Conover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JC> Are there any?
Definitionally, no. (Consider, for example, the differences between
viewing HTML documents in Netscape and under Lynx.)
I like to use psgml-mode in XEmacs to edit my SGML (DocBook, HTML).
YMMV.
--
David Maze
I haven't heard of any...
but you could try Lyx, it will convert its latex output to sgml if you
have sgml-tools installed. Docbook, linuxdoc article and linuxdoc
manpage are directly supported (with the version in Potato anyways), you
may be able to get other dtds to work if you put your mi
Are there any?
Thanks,
John
--
John Conover[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.johncon.com/
631 Lamont Ct. Tel. 408.370.2688 http://www.johncon.com/ntropix/
Campbell, CA 95008 Fax. 408.379.9602 http://www.johncon.com/nformatix/
Hello,
Thanks for all of the replies. Last I check out the LDP (
about a week ago ) they said that all HOWTO's still needed to be in
LinuxDoc format instead of DocBook. I have not found any information
about customizing LinuxDoc though I have found plenty about DocBook.
My intention now is
* J Horacio MG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> README.Debian file for sgml-tools says that version 1 is orphaned
>> upstream. I take that to mean that I might not get help from the
>> upstream authors.
> Not sure, but I think that even the sgmltools2 is orphaned by no
> Hello,
> I am not sure exactly where to ask this question, but the
> README.Debian file for sgml-tools says that version 1 is orphaned
> upstream. I take that to mean that I might not get help from the
> upstream authors.
Not sure, but I think that even the sgmltools2 is
Hello,
I am not sure exactly where to ask this question, but the
README.Debian file for sgml-tools says that version 1 is orphaned
upstream. I take that to mean that I might not get help from the
upstream authors.
Anyway my problem is this: I am writing a HOWTO in LinuxDoc
format
Martin Fluch wrote:
> There are some debian packages for that: bug and reportbug
Please don't report another bug about that. Instead, read any of these bugs:
#47363, #50286, #50540, #52052, #46270, #50286, #50540, or #52052
--
see shy jo
-announce,
> debian-news, debian-change, debian-user.
>
> Output when installing debiandoc-sgml:
> Cannot find termcap: Can't find a valid termcap file at
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.005/Term/ReadLine.pm
>
> Status:
> No solution found yet.
>
> Liking Debian more and more,
Hello,
Since I'm new to Debian I don't know where to report (possible) bugs
yet I'm posting it here. Please advise me to the correct list next
time. The lists subscribed to so far are: debian-announce,
debian-news, debian-change, debian-user.
Output when installing debiandoc-sg
E: end tag for "DOCBOOK" omitted, but its
> declaration does not permit this
> /usr/bin/jade:0:2:0: start tag was here
>
You have docbook installed, no? It looks like it's not being found.
There should be a file /etc/catalog that should have an entry pointing
to the loc
Hi,
I wrote an entire document using the debiandoc DTD before I
realized that I picked on the weaker and less prevailing DTD. I would like
to convert my entire document to docbook. Unfortunately, the docbook
package that I have (originally the Slink package, but I upgraded to the
potato sg
[Aside, there's an SGML list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 16, 1999 at 00:22:46 +0100, Steve George wrote:
> Does anyone know of any tools to convert from SGML (or any output jade can
> make) to PDF?
Use jade's TeX output and run it through pdfjadetex (see e.g.
http://www.
Hi,
Does anyone know of any tools to convert from SGML (or any output jade can
make) to PDF?
The tutorials all show jadetex but this keeps failing for me. I get this error
if anyone knows how to fix it:
This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (Web2C 7.3) (format=jadetex 1999.8.24) 16 OCT 1999
00:19
>> "Felipe" == Felipe Alvarez Harnecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Felipe> Hi, anybody knows about a simple "user manual" DTD available
Felipe> ?? DocBook is oversized for this task and i don't know about
Felipe> any repository of DTDs.
Maybe linuxdoc? There is a debian package. As for Docbook,
Hi, anybody knows about a simple "user manual" DTD available ??
DocBook is oversized for this task and i don't know about any
repository of DTDs.
Thanks.
--
__
Felipe Alvarez Harnecker. QlSoftware.
Tel. 09.874.60.17 e-mail
ck returns no errors, and
> sgml2html and sgml2lyx works fine. I am hardly familiar with either sgml or
This is a genuine TeX problem.
Cheers,
Colin
--
Colin Marquardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I just recently started having problems with sgml-tools... I was forced to
kill a bunch of hung processes after some bad sgml caused them to choke, and
now sgml2latex refuses to work. I keep getting these errors:
Processing file mech430_report.sgml
This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (Web2C 7.3.1
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 18:27:00 +0200, Egon Schmid wrote:
> No. Use DebianDoc or DocBook and forget sgml-tools.
Just some background: tools like sgml-tools that format or translate SGML
documents usually support only a specific set of DTDs. In the case of
sgml-tools, it's Linuxdoc-sgml
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, J Horacio MG wrote:
> Been there, seen that, still confused (well, at least I subscribed to
> the sgml-tools list).
Some introduction into DocBook:
http://nis-www.lanl.gov/~rosalia/mydocs/docbook-intro.html
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/docbook-tools/
http://www.freeb
Thanks Egon, but:
Egon Schmid dixit:
~>
~> Anything you should know is here:
~>
~> www.oasis-open.org
Been there, seen that, still confused (well, at least I subscribed to
the sgml-tools list).
~> > h0rus:/tmp$ sgml2html debiandoc-sgml.sgml
~> > Processing
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, J Horacio MG wrote:
> {I'm writing some docs on SGML, but I'm having some trouble when
> converting them with sgml-tools, and I too am a bit confused with it, is
> there any mailing list on the subject (ie. SGML)?
>
> Also, what's the dif
My apologies, I know I shouldn't try to call the attention with caps
etc., but I've tried this question a couple of times and seem to get no
response so far:
{I'm writing some docs on SGML, but I'm having some trouble when
converting them with sgml-tools, and I too am a bit
Hi,
I'm writing some docs on SGML, but I'm having some trouble when
converting them with sgml-tools, and I too am a bit confused with it, is
there any mailing list on the subject (ie. SGML)?
Also, what's the difference between Debiandoc-SGML, Linuxdoc-SGML and
Docbook?
TIA
--
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
