Stephen P. Molnar, on 2018-10-08:
> I'm confused a normal state for me, one of increasing mental
> entropy)?
Let's exchange some, then...
> I decided to try Buster in VirtualBox on my Stretch AMD
> platform and downloaded the dvd1. The installer installed the
> 4.16.0 kernel, but no header fiel
Dennis Wicks wrote on 09/27/2018 06:40 PM:
> I notice that there is available two different kernels;
>
> linux-image-4.9.0-8-686-pae
>
> and
>
> linux-image-4.9.0-8-rt-686-pae
>
> I am running on a Pentium 4.
>
> Which one of these should I be using? And just for
> curiosities sake
On Thursday 27 September 2018 19:40:59 Dennis Wicks wrote:
> I notice that there is available two different kernels;
>
> linux-image-4.9.0-8-686-pae
>
> and
>
> linux-image-4.9.0-8-rt-686-pae
>
> I am running on a Pentium 4.
>
> Which one of these should I be using? And just for
> curi
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 06:40:59PM -0500, Dennis Wicks wrote:
> I notice that there is available two different kernels;
>
> linux-image-4.9.0-8-686-pae
>
> and
>
> linux-image-4.9.0-8-rt-686-pae
>
> I am running on a Pentium 4.
>
> Which one of these should I be using? And just for
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 07:44:17AM -0800, ray wrote:
> I am installing Debian 9.3 non-free on anamd64 machine. During installation
> of the base system, it asks to choose a kernel
> Linux-image-4.9.0-4-amd64
> Linux-image-amd64
> What is the difference of these?
>
You probably want linux-image-
Yes. Two of the above.
You are running Debian kernel 3.16.7-ckt25-2+deb8u3 which is compatible
with the kernel ABI used in Debian kernel *package* 3.16.0-4-686-pae.
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-5195 confirms
that you want 3.16.36-1+deb8u2.
Thank you for your quick r
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:18:03PM +0100, Georg Stillfried wrote:
> can someone please help me find out which kernel version (and
> sub-version) I have?
uname -a
> $ uname -v
> #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt25-2+deb8u3 (2016-07-02)
>
> $ uname -r
> 3.16.0-4-686-pae
Or that. It's the same as uname -
Wolodja Wentland wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 19:04 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>
> A very unique and inventive hostname - if that is the output of 'uname
> -a'
>
That is, objectively, the reason why one tries to find an unique
hostname, but we will all agree on the special character o
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Merciadri Luca wrote:
> > Ionreflex wrote:
> >> [quote]
> >> Linux lol 2.4.27-3-586tsc #1 Tue Dec 5 22:06:26 UTC 2006 i586 GNU/Linux
> >> [/quote]
> > What does `lol' mean here?
>
> I guess it's just the hostname of the computer in question.
>
Special, but funny. Must b
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 19:04 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> I have no answer to your question, but I am wondering...
>
> Ionreflex wrote:
> > [quote]
> > Linux lol 2.4.27-3-586tsc #1 Tue Dec 5 22:06:26 UTC 2006 i586 GNU/Linux
> > [/quote]
> What does `lol' mean here? Is it some version of somethi
Merciadri Luca wrote:
> I have no answer to your question, but I am wondering...
NB: Apparently, the original post you replied to was to debian-laptop,
not debian-user...
--
Johannes
In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the
humble reasoning of a single individual.
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Ionreflex wrote:
>> [quote]
>> Linux lol 2.4.27-3-586tsc #1 Tue Dec 5 22:06:26 UTC 2006 i586 GNU/Linux
>> [/quote]
> What does `lol' mean here?
I guess it's just the hostname of the computer in question.
- --
Johannes
In que
I have no answer to your question, but I am wondering...
Ionreflex wrote:
> [quote]
> Linux lol 2.4.27-3-586tsc #1 Tue Dec 5 22:06:26 UTC 2006 i586 GNU/Linux
> [/quote]
What does `lol' mean here? Is it some version of something, or did you
simply put this over there because you have some sense of
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> Recently the 2.6.32-3-686 kernel was posted to testing. When it was
> added to the grub menu it was put *after* the 2.6.32-trunk-686 kernel.
>
> Which is the newer kernel? If 2.6.32-3 is newer why was it placed in
> second position?
>
> --
>
On 29 Jan., 07:50, "Paul Csanyi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
[..]
> Which kernel module is for the usb-ethernet adapter:
>
> usbnet, or other?
>
> Any advices will be appreciated!
>
> --
> Regards, Paul Csanyihttp://www.freewebs.com/csanyi-pal/index.htm
Hello
usbnet is just the framewor
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:45:40AM +0100, Paul Csanyi wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I shall buy an usb-ethernet adapter for my laptop.
>
> Will works any usb-ethernet adapter with Debian Etch
> system?
>
> Which kernel module is for the usb-ethernet adapter:
Chances are that the evice will load automatic
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 10:28:48AM +0800, Kun Niu wrote:
> > Thank you for tracing my problem.
> > It's true that my root system is of ext3 format.
> > I only got the compiled image from the mirror site security.debian.org.
> > I don't know if ext3 is compiled is built into the kernel or compiled
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 10:28:48AM +0800, Kun Niu wrote:
> Thank you for tracing my problem.
> It's true that my root system is of ext3 format.
> I only got the compiled image from the mirror site security.debian.org.
> I don't know if ext3 is compiled is built into the kernel or compiled
> as a mo
Thank you for tracing my problem.
It's true that my root system is of ext3 format.
I only got the compiled image from the mirror site security.debian.org.
I don't know if ext3 is compiled is built into the kernel or compiled
as a module.
Do I have to check that before I reboot the system?
I'm sure
I think your CPU is perfectly suported by 2.6.8 smp kernel.
So, it is possible that the boot problem is caused by any other problem (i.e.
your 2.6.8 smp kernel has not built in support for your root filesystem).
For example, if your root filesystem is ext3 and your kernel has compiled ext3
supp
Thank you for your reply.
I'm sorry that the machine is really far from my reach.
And I asked someone who was not familiar with linux restart my server
and choose my original kernel for me.
I wonder if the 686 kernel of 2.6.18 is the right one for me.
Thanks again for your reply.
2007/8/6, srgqwer
And what error messages had you got when the system failed to boot with 2.6.8
smp kernel?
They are important in order to determine the boot failed reason.
Regards
On Sunday 05 August 2007 17:40, Kun Niu wrote:
> Dear all,
> The following is the cat message from /proc/cpuinfo
> processor :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/24/07 20:12, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Chaim Keren Tzion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to run 32 bit Debian Testing/Larry on my AMD Athlon(tm)
>> 64 X2
>> Dual Core Processor 4400+ CPU.
>>
>> Which kernel should I
On 5/25/07, Chaim Keren Tzion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I would like to run 32 bit Debian Testing/Larry on my AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2
Dual Core Processor 4400+ CPU.
Which kernel should I choose? I switched from the default 2.6.18-4-486
to 2.6.18-4-amd64 but I am having trouble compiling an Nv
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 04:15:15PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:53:51 -0700
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 01:27:05PM -0500, Default User wrote:
> > > Just trying to do an expert non-gui install of Etch. During base system
> > >
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:53:51 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 01:27:05PM -0500, Default User wrote:
> > Just trying to do an expert non-gui install of Etch. During base system
> > installation, it asks which kernel to install:
[snip]
> > none (ye
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 01:27:05PM -0500, Default User wrote:
> Just trying to do an expert non-gui install of Etch. During base system
> installation, it asks which kernel to install:
>
> linux-image-2.6.18-4-486
this is a specific kernel version and refers to a package which
actually contain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:53:33 +
Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> Today I have built a new box running Debian testing with 2GB of RAM.
> I used Debian testing because the Sarge installer didn't support my
> hardware.
>
> The probl
Hi,
Andy wrote:
Hello List,
Today I have built a new box running Debian testing with 2GB of RAM. I
used Debian testing because the Sarge installer didn't support my hardware.
The problem is that while my BIOS reports the full 2GB of RAM, top only
reports 960MB.
I have learnt from Google t
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:12:29PM +, Hans-Peter Sulzer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have tried to install the Nvidia video drivers on
> the current stable release (Sarge). But it needs
> kernel sources installed. I have installed the
> 2.6.8.2-686 kernel (as offered by the standard
> DVD install progra
H. S. wrote:
This may sound like a dumb question but should one apply debian kernel
patches to a Debian source kernel before compiling one? e.g. I am right
now working on kernel source of 2.6.9. Are the patches included in this
source or should I select and install the ones listed by:
$> COLUMNS
H. S. wrote:
This may sound like a dumb question but should one apply debian kernel
patches to a Debian source kernel before compiling one? e.g. I am right
now working on kernel source of 2.6.9. Are the patches included in this
source or should I select and install the ones listed by:
$> COLUMNS
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 11:47 -0500, H. S. wrote:
> This may sound like a dumb question but should one apply debian kernel
> patches to a Debian source kernel before compiling one? e.g. I am right
> now working on kernel source of 2.6.9. Are the patches included in this
> source or should I select
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> Hello
>
> Oliver Fuchs (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>
> > at the moment I am running a 2.2.20 kernel (compiled by myself) on my
> > debian woody box. For the upcoming next version (sarge) I'd like to
> > know if I have to upgrade my kernel to another
Hello
Oliver Fuchs (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> at the moment I am running a 2.2.20 kernel (compiled by myself) on my
> debian woody box. For the upcoming next version (sarge) I'd like to
> know if I have to upgrade my kernel to another version (2.4 or even
> 2.6) and what version exactly is re
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 11:56:07PM -0500, matt zagrabelny wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 20:21, Johnny wrote:
> > Hi
> > I have installed Debian-3.0r2-i386, I have installed ax25-tools,
> > ax25-apps, libax25 packages. And turn around and installed
> > ax25-config-03.3 package. Now i have been to
On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 20:21, Johnny wrote:
> Hi
> I have installed Debian-3.0r2-i386, I have installed ax25-tools,
> ax25-apps, libax25 packages. And turn around and installed
> ax25-config-03.3 package. Now i have been told that I need to compile
> the kernel for Packet radio work right. I hav
Johnny wrote:
Hi
I have installed Debian-3.0r2-i386, I have installed ax25-tools,
ax25-apps, libax25 packages. And turn around and installed
ax25-config-03.3 package. Now i have been told that I need to compile
the kernel for Packet radio work right. I have been googlen and
reading how to comp
>
> I'm using kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686-smp for such a machine
> (incl. an init RD for raid1 and reiserfs). But how can I
> enable HT there? [Note: I need a Debian "stock" kernel, not
> a home-grown, for this machine.]
>
I would check the BIOS to see if there is a setting to turn on
hyper-thre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 24 October 2003 09:32 am, W. Borgert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686-smp for such a machine
> (incl. an init RD for raid1 and reiserfs). But how can I
> enable HT there? [Note: I need a Debian "stock" kernel, not
> a ho
Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 07:50:58AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 22:55, Kent West wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 16:50, Kent West wrote:
Got a Walmart Microtel $300 computer with a Via Ezra microprocessor. I
want to up
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 07:50:58AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 22:55, Kent West wrote:
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > >On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 16:50, Kent West wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>Got a Walmart Microtel $300 computer with a Via Ezra microprocessor. I
> > >>want to upgra
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 22:55, Kent West wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 16:50, Kent West wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Got a Walmart Microtel $300 computer with a Via Ezra microprocessor. I
> >>want to upgrade to a 2.4.20 kernel image from Unstable. Which image do I
> >>need for thi
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 16:50, Kent West wrote:
Got a Walmart Microtel $300 computer with a Via Ezra microprocessor. I
want to upgrade to a 2.4.20 kernel image from Unstable. Which image do I
need for this chip, or will I have to roll my own?
The Via C3 series, of whic
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 16:50, Kent West wrote:
> Got a Walmart Microtel $300 computer with a Via Ezra microprocessor. I
> want to upgrade to a 2.4.20 kernel image from Unstable. Which image do I
> need for this chip, or will I have to roll my own?
The Via C3 series, of which the Ezra is part of,
* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
...
> Please correct me if I have misunderstood. It was my impression that
> the odd numbered kernel sub-versions eg., 2.1, 2.3, 2.5 are/were
> testing/unstable. When they are ready for prime time, they are
> promoted. Thus 2.1 became 2.2, 2.3 beca
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:18:39PM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:10:32 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:23:40 +0100 Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Is there any reason, not to run a 2.4.* kernel?
> >
> >There are those who think that 2.2 is m
On Monday 18 February 2002 09:18 pm, Gary Turner wrote:
[snip]
> Please correct me if I have misunderstood. It was my impression that
> the odd numbered kernel sub-versions eg., 2.1, 2.3, 2.5 are/were
> testing/unstable. When they are ready for prime time, they are
> promoted. Thus 2.1 became 2.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:18:39 -0600 Gary Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:10:32 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:23:40 +0100 Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Is there any reason, not to run a 2.4.* kernel?
> >
> >There are those who th
February 19, 2002 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: Which Kernel 2.4.* or 2.2
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:10:32 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:23:40 +0100 Tim Dijkstra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Is there any reason, not to run a 2.4.* kernel?
> &
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:10:32 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:23:40 +0100 Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Is there any reason, not to run a 2.4.* kernel?
>
>There are those who think that 2.2 is more stable than 2.4 in
>production server environments.
>
>Being a home
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:23:40 +0100 Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any reason, not to run a 2.4.* kernel?
There are those who think that 2.2 is more stable than 2.4 in
production server environments.
Being a home user, I haven't had any problems with 2.4, starting
with 2.4.3,
> Hi all:
hi ,
>
> I have an AMD Athlon(tm) Processor, which kernel-image i must use ?
>
> a) kernel-image-2.4.14-686 - Linux kernel image for version 2.4.14 on
> PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII.
surely not
>
> b) kernel-image-2.4.14-k6 - Linux kernel image for version 2.4.14 on AMD
> K6/K6-II/K6-III
n
> "Eric" == Eric G Miller writes:
Eric> $ uname -a Linux calico 2.4.14 #1 Sat Nov 10 16:29:17 PST 2001
Eric> i686 unknown
Eric> Won't compile at all? Perhaps something breaks, that I'm not
Eric> using...? I don't have a DVD drive...
Loopback device is broken. Otherwise it compiles fine. (Ke
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 23:19:34 -0800, Jim McCloskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Eric Miller wrote:
>
> |> Won't compile at all? Perhaps something breaks, that I'm not using...?
> |> I don't have a DVD drive...
>
> 2.4.14 won't build if you include support for the loopback device.
> This has b
Eric Miller wrote:
|> Won't compile at all? Perhaps something breaks, that I'm not using...?
|> I don't have a DVD drive...
2.4.14 won't build if you include support for the loopback device.
This has been much discussed on the kernel mailing-list.
To get it to compile, you have to hand-edit th
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 16:39:17 -0800, Jim McCloskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> |> Similarly, 2.4.10+ are the only kernels
> |> in the 2.4.x series without major uglies yet
>
> Hmm, but 2.4.14 won't compile at all, and you have to avoid all
> of the kernels from 2.4.10 to 2.4.12 (don't kn
on Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 04:39:17PM -0800, Jim McCloskey ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
> |> Similarly, 2.4.10+ are the only kernels
> |> in the 2.4.x series without major uglies yet
>
> Hmm, but 2.4.14 won't compile at all, and you have to avoid all
> of the kernels from 2.4.10 to 2.4.12 (do
|> Similarly, 2.4.10+ are the only kernels
|> in the 2.4.x series without major uglies yet
Hmm, but 2.4.14 won't compile at all, and you have to avoid all
of the kernels from 2.4.10 to 2.4.12 (don't know about 2.4.13) if you
want to use the dvd player Xine (don't know if that counts as a `m
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, op wrote:
> Yesterday I installed 2.4.13-ac8 for the ext3 stuff. It didn't work too well
> so I reverted to 2.4.13-ac6 which hasn't crashed for 5 hours and 19
> minutes.
This is probably because Alan introduced some new IDE code in
-ac7. We should see that stuff sta
Yesterday I installed 2.4.13-ac8 for the ext3 stuff. It didn't work too well
so I reverted to 2.4.13-ac6 which hasn't crashed for 5 hours and 19
minutes.
Also sprach Steve Kieu:> Hi all,
>
> Yes I put this question as I saw a lot kernel image
>
> :-)
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> =
> S.KIEU
>
> http:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 08:44:47PM +1100, Steve Kieu wrote:
|
| Hi all,
|
| Yes I put this question as I saw a lot kernel image
Karsten gave some good rules of thumb.
I currenlty have 2.4.10 on my desktop and 2.4.13 on my employer's
laptop. I haven't had any problems (other than my mis-configu
Forgot to mention that my VM troubles was with 2.4.12
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 01:59:37AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 08:44:47PM +1100, Steve Kieu ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Yes I put this question as I saw a lot kernel image
> > :-)
>
> It depends.
>
> For a stable firewall/gateway system, I'd
on Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 08:44:47PM +1100, Steve Kieu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Yes I put this question as I saw a lot kernel image
> :-)
It depends.
For a stable firewall/gateway system, I'd probably go with a 2.0 or 2.2
kernel. Yes, the firewalling code in 2.4 is a lot more c
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 05:38:30PM -0500, Chris Hoover wrote:
:I'm looking for some help. I need to install a new kernel on my nat machine,
but I'm not sure which kernel to go for. I must have a kernel that can run
pppoe (for my adsl) and I also need to be able to nat vpn connections (I have a
» Chris Hoover disse isso e eu digo aquilo:
> I'm looking for some help. I need to install a new kernel on my nat
> machine, but I'm not sure which kernel to go for. I must have a
> kernel that can run pppoe (for my adsl) and I also need to be able
> to nat vpn connections (I have a vpn client t
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> after i recompiled my new kernel,some of my applications tell me that cannt
> find the
> module of char-major-100(maybe this name),maybe i erase some options of the
> kernel that
> provide this module,does anyone know which options provide this mo
On 02-Nov-2000 Jonathan Chang wrote:
> Hi, there,
>
> Recently I plan to install Debian on a IBM Netfinity 3500 M20 (without
> RAID). This machine has two Pentium III 733Mhz, and I want to build a
> kernel with SMP support from kernel source. My question is, which kernel
> should I try? I heard
Thank you all for the help in regards to the 3-Com
network card and the kernels. It was for an off-list
friend who is trying to set up a network in a high
school here, in Colorado. I am running the 2.1.132 kernel,
myself, but there are a couple of 3c905B cards here, waiting
to be installed,
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Which is the earliest kernel that will work with 3-Com
: 3c905B cards? And is there any documentation on the Net that
: tells which kernels support which hardware? ...trying to help
: a schoolteacher get his network going here.
2.0.34, I b
rom: David Zanetti [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 19, 1999 9:23 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc: recipient list not shown
> Subject: RE: Which Kernel for 3c905B Network Cards?
>
> I have a machine here with two 3c
I have a machine here with two 3c509's in it, there's a standard driver
for them named as 3c509 in the kernel. (might even be as a module, in
which case try `modprobe 3c509`)
wrong, read the message again...
Card is 905B, module name is 3c59x
Good Luck!
OK
--
David Zanetti,
I have a machine here with two 3c509's in it, there's a standard driver
for them named as 3c509 in the kernel. (might even be as a module, in
which case try `modprobe 3c509`)
Good Luck!
--
David Zanetti, Unix System Administrator, Information Technology Group
Wellington City Council, New Zealand
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 23:15:34 +
Resent-from: debian-user@lists.DEBIAN.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Precedence: list
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/37303
X-Lo
Alan Tam wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Use the latest kernel 2.2.1 at http://www.kernel.org which supports
> shared
> parallel ports.
>
> The program which compiles the kernel under Hamm is gcc make which is
> included in the Hamm packages, that means you don't have to download newer
> ver
Hi,
Use the latest kernel 2.2.1 at http://www.kernel.org which supports
shared
parallel ports.
The program which compiles the kernel under Hamm is gcc make which is
included in the Hamm packages, that means you don't have to download newer
versions of software.
I am new
On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Gonzalo A. Diethelm wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm considering buying the CD release for Debian 1.3.1. I have the
> following requirements for the kernel:
>
> * Support for multi-threading.
> * Particularly, support for kernel threading (Linux Threads, NOT
> Provenzano MIT threa
78 matches
Mail list logo
