On Wed 23 Feb 2022 at 19:04:21 +, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2022, lina wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anybody know what is the cost range to build the website for a lab?
> > including all,
> >
> > basically layout is
> >
> > research | people | publication
> >
> > Thanks for your
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 01:02:19PM -0600, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:50 PM wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:27:50PM -0600, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:16 PM Nicholas Geovanis <
> > nickgeova...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > [...]
>
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022, lina wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody know what is the cost range to build the website for a lab?
including all,
basically layout is
research | people | publication
Thanks for your help,
Does anyone know what is the cost range to build a lab?
including all
basically layout is
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:50 PM wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:27:50PM -0600, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:16 PM Nicholas Geovanis <
> nickgeova...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I should have added:
> > For incremental cost, you can do things in the cloud
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:27:50PM -0600, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:16 PM Nicholas Geovanis
> wrote:
[...]
> I should have added:
> For incremental cost, you can do things in the cloud that are basically
> impossible on your own.
> For example, you can have AWS cloud
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:16 PM Nicholas Geovanis
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 11:28 AM lina wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anybody know what is the cost range to build the website for a lab?
>> including all,
>> basically layout is
>> research | people | publication
>>
>
> Consider using cloud
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 11:28 AM lina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody know what is the cost range to build the website for a lab?
> including all,
> basically layout is
> research | people | publication
>
Consider using cloud services for a smaller more-static website. If "lab"
means, say, US gove
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 06:28:01PM +0100, lina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody know what is the cost range to build the website for a lab?
> including all,
>
> basically layout is
>
> research | people | publication
>
> Thanks for your help,
$0 if you can code HTML and setup your own web server
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021, 2:10 AM Richard Hector wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm reviewing how I set up websites (mostly Wordpress at the moment),
> and would like other opinions on what I'm planning is sane.
>
> My plan is to have a user eg "mysite" that owns all/most of the standard
> files and directories
On 2/02/21 10:42 pm, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 2/2/21 5:32 pm, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 2/2/21 4:55 pm, Richard Hector wrote:
What you are doing sounds pretty O.K. Though I personally also use
SELinux for web facing services.
Thanks.
I haven't looked in to SELinux. I looked at AppArmor, but
On 2/2/21 5:32 pm, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 2/2/21 4:55 pm, Richard Hector wrote:
What you are doing sounds pretty O.K. Though I personally also use
SELinux for web facing services.
Thanks.
I haven't looked in to SELinux. I looked at AppArmor, but it appears
that it won't work as expected
On 2/02/21 10:37 pm, john doe wrote:
On 2/2/2021 9:55 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 2/02/21 9:11 pm, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 2/2/21 3:09 pm, Richard Hector wrote:
Hi all,
I'm reviewing how I set up websites (mostly Wordpress at the moment),
and would like other opinions on what I'm planning i
On 2/2/2021 9:55 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 2/02/21 9:11 pm, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 2/2/21 3:09 pm, Richard Hector wrote:
Hi all,
I'm reviewing how I set up websites (mostly Wordpress at the moment),
and would like other opinions on what I'm planning is sane.
My plan is to have a user eg
On 2/2/21 4:55 pm, Richard Hector wrote:
What you are doing sounds pretty O.K. Though I personally also use
SELinux for web facing services.
Thanks.
I haven't looked in to SELinux. I looked at AppArmor, but it appears
that it won't work as expected in an LXC container, which is where I
ru
On 2/02/21 9:11 pm, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 2/2/21 3:09 pm, Richard Hector wrote:
Hi all,
I'm reviewing how I set up websites (mostly Wordpress at the moment),
and would like other opinions on what I'm planning is sane.
My plan is to have a user eg "mysite" that owns all/most of the
standa
On 2/2/21 3:09 pm, Richard Hector wrote:
Hi all,
I'm reviewing how I set up websites (mostly Wordpress at the moment),
and would like other opinions on what I'm planning is sane.
My plan is to have a user eg "mysite" that owns all/most of the
standard files and directories.
The webserver
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 08/31/08 11:02, Philip wrote:
I'm looking for a tool which spiders a site, and downloads every page in
the domain that it finds linked from a particular url and linked urls
in the domain, creating a local site that can be manipulated offline as
static html.
Is there such
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:53:38 +0530
Sabarish Balagopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 08/31/08 11:02, Philip wrote:
> >> I'm looking for a tool which spiders a site, and downloads every
> >> page in the domain that it finds linked from a particular url and
> >> linked urls i
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 08/31/08 11:02, Philip wrote:
I'm looking for a tool which spiders a site, and downloads every page in
the domain that it finds linked from a particular url and linked urls
in the domain, creating a local site that can be manipulated offline as
static html.
Is there such
On 08/31/08 11:02, Philip wrote:
I'm looking for a tool which spiders a site, and downloads every page in
the domain that it finds linked from a particular url and linked urls
in the domain, creating a local site that can be manipulated offline as
static html.
Is there such a tool for linux (be
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 05:02:01PM +0100, Philip wrote:
> I'm looking for a tool which spiders a site, and downloads every page in
> the domain that it finds linked from a particular url and linked urls
> in the domain, creating a local site that can be manipulated offline as
> static html.
>
> I
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a tool which spiders a site, and downloads every page in
> the domain that it finds linked from a particular url and linked urls
> in the domain, creating a local site that can be manipulated offline as
> static
Philip wrote:
I'm looking for a tool which spiders a site, and downloads every page in
the domain that it finds linked from a particular url and linked urls
in the domain, creating a local site that can be manipulated offline as
static html.
Is there such a tool for linux (better still debian)?
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 07:30:16PM +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I thought of writing a really minimal web-site front end, that would only
> look at incoming http requests and forward them to other processes,
> possibly on other machines, depending on the site name or pther parts of
> the URL. B
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:59:50PM +1000, Owen Townend wrote:
> On 22/04/2008, Hendrik Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:38:00 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> >
> > I was under the impression that apache did a lot more than just relay
> > http requests; that in fac
On 22/04/2008, Hendrik Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:38:00 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>
> I was under the impression that apache did a lot more than just relay
> http requests; that in fact said relaying is but a small fraction of its
> activities. Is there not
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:38:00 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Hendrik Boom wrote:
>> I thought of writing a really minimal web-site front end, that would
>> only look at incoming http requests and forward them to other
>> processes, possibly on other machines, depending on the site name or
>>
On Sunday 20 April 2008 21:38:00 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > I thought of writing a really minimal web-site front end, that would only
> > look at incoming http requests and forward them to other processes,
> > possibly on other machines, depending on the site name or pthe
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I thought of writing a really minimal web-site front end, that would only
> look at incoming http requests and forward them to other processes,
> possibly on other machines, depending on the site name or pther parts of
> the URL. But then I thought, surely that must have b
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 10:12:21PM -0600 or thereabouts, Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
> On 2004-06-11, S.D.A. penned:
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:36:52AM -0600 or thereabouts, Monique Y.
> > Mudama wrote:
> > Seriously, I don't like them myself, and I'm not overly fond of Flash
> > personally, eith
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 08:41:54PM -0500, Jacob S. wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 06:55:34 +0530
> "Sridhar M.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > imaptool is one simple program to get the image maps. A more full
> > featured program is kimagemapeditor.
>
> imaptool looks good,
On 2004-06-11, S.D.A. penned:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:36:52AM -0600 or thereabouts, Monique Y.
> Mudama wrote:
>> On 2004-06-07, Nick Smith penned:
>> > there is no way im going to design complex image maps or anything
>> > else with lengthy code by hand any more, too much chance for error
>>
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 06:55:34 +0530
"Sridhar M.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 01:08:49PM -0500, Jacob S. wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:36:52 -0600
>> "Monique Y. Mudama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > On 2004-06-07, Nick Smith penned:
>> > > the
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 01:08:49PM -0500, Jacob S. wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:36:52 -0600
> "Monique Y. Mudama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 2004-06-07, Nick Smith penned:
> > > there is no way im going to design complex image maps or anything
> > > else with lengthy
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:36:52AM -0600 or thereabouts, Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
> On 2004-06-07, Nick Smith penned:
> > there is no way im going to design complex image maps or anything else
> > with lengthy code by hand any more, too much chance for error and it
> > takes way too long to do it.
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:36:52 -0600
"Monique Y. Mudama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2004-06-07, Nick Smith penned:
> > there is no way im going to design complex image maps or anything
> > else with lengthy code by hand any more, too much chance for error
> > and it takes way too long to do it.
On 2004-06-07, Nick Smith penned:
> there is no way im going to design complex image maps or anything else
> with lengthy code by hand any more, too much chance for error and it
> takes way too long to do it. i wish wine would pick up the pace and
Playing devil's advocate here ... when is an imag
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 09:15:58AM -0700 or thereabouts, Alvin Oga wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, S.D.A. wrote:
>
> > I'm not knocking those using Vi, Vi(m) or Emacs, they're probably experts at
> > writing raw HTML. However, I have my doubts, that way, works in an efficient
> > standardized work
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, S.D.A. wrote:
> I'm not knocking those using Vi, Vi(m) or Emacs, they're probably experts at
> writing raw HTML. However, I have my doubts, that way, works in an efficient
> standardized workflow, within a workgroup, where others are using Visual IDE's
> -- In fact I know it w
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:27:07PM +0300 or thereabouts, Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:14:47PM -0400, S.D.A. wrote:
> > Drifting away from Linux Visual Editors...
> >
> > FrontPage 2003 is vastly superior to anything prior, in the FPage line. I'm
> > definitely not a MSFT lov
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 07:47:08AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Micha Feigin wrote:
> > The main problem with FrontPage and DWMX is that they tend to be very
> > incompatible with anything other then explorer, especially when using
> > dhtml and css, but also some features with regular html.
>
>
Micha Feigin wrote:
> The main problem with FrontPage and DWMX is that they tend to be very
> incompatible with anything other then explorer, especially when using
> dhtml and css, but also some features with regular html.
Eh? Work in Dreamweaver, test in Mozilla and Opera, no problems thus f
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 08:00:51PM -0400, richard lyons wrote:
> On Monday 07 June 2004 11:56, Micha Feigin wrote:
> [...]
> > Doesn't mozilla also have an html editor?
> [...]
>
> Have you _read_ any html produced by Mozilla? I really do not think
> you can recommend anyone to go that route.
>
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:14:47PM -0400, S.D.A. wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:36:27AM -0400 or thereabouts, Nick Smith wrote:
>
> > forget frontpage, what about a dreamweaver alternative? i do respect the hand
> > coding people out there, i too started coding with VI, but there is no way im
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:36:27AM -0400 or thereabouts, Nick Smith wrote:
> forget frontpage, what about a dreamweaver alternative? i do respect the hand
> coding people out there, i too started coding with VI, but there is no way im
> going to design complex image maps or anything else with leng
On Monday 07 June 2004 17:12, H. S. wrote:
> Apparently, _richard lyons_, on 06/07/04 04:37,typed:
> > knowing or writing html -- a wysiwyg editor. Mozilla writes crap
> > html.
>
> Could you expand on this issue? I have used Mozilla composer and
> apart from tweaking its code a bit (stuff related
On Monday 07 June 2004 17:36, Nick Smith hurled the following on the wire:
> Joost De Cock said:
> > On Monday 07 June 2004 15:31, jack kinnon hurled the following on the
> >
> > wire:
> >> Hi
> >> Thanks for the input. What I am referring to is
> >> something like the MS FrontPage, not just an or
On Tuesday 08 Jun 2004 00:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Nick Smith wrote:
> > forget frontpage, what about a dreamweaver alternative?
> You might want to check out N-View, see http://www.nvu.com/ for more
I gather NVu is simple Mozilla's Composer program by another name. Actu
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 01:31:23 +0200 (MEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> You might want to check out N-View, see http://www.nvu.com/ for more
> info. Haven't use it myself though, I am just too fond of vim and
> more recently the Template Toolkit.
My understanding is that NVu is just Mozilla's editor
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Nick Smith wrote:
>
>> forget frontpage, what about a dreamweaver alternative?
>
> You might want to check out N-View, see http://www.nvu.com/ for more
> info. Haven't use it myself though, I am just too fond of vim and
> more recently the Template Toolkit.
>
> Grx HdV
>
>
wo
Its better then frontpage output, even the newest version of it had
html syntax errors.
On 7 Jun 2004 at 20:00, richard lyons wrote:
> On Monday 07 June 2004 11:56, Micha Feigin wrote:
> [...]
> > Doesn't mozilla also have an html editor?
> [...]
>
> Have you _read_ any html produced by Mozilla
On Monday 07 June 2004 11:56, Micha Feigin wrote:
[...]
> Doesn't mozilla also have an html editor?
[...]
Have you _read_ any html produced by Mozilla? I really do not think
you can recommend anyone to go that route.
--
richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Nick Smith wrote:
> forget frontpage, what about a dreamweaver alternative?
You might want to check out N-View, see http://www.nvu.com/ for more
info. Haven't use it myself though, I am just too fond of vim and
more recently the Template Toolkit.
Grx HdV
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Micha Feigin wrote:
> BTW I also use vi/emacs for web work, gives you much more control and
> you know exactly what is in there and where to fix things.
Ok, now it's getting thick around here. I love vim as much as the next
guy but, at least in the case of Dreamweaver, you know exactly what's
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:56:27PM +0200, Joost De Cock wrote:
> On Monday 07 June 2004 15:31, jack kinnon hurled the following on the wire:
> > Hi
> > Thanks for the input. What I am referring to is
> > something like the MS FrontPage, not just an ordinary
> > editor.
>
> must-suppress-urge-to-m
Joost De Cock said:
> On Monday 07 June 2004 15:31, jack kinnon hurled the following on the
> wire:
>> Hi
>> Thanks for the input. What I am referring to is
>> something like the MS FrontPage, not just an ordinary
>> editor.
>
> must-suppress-urge-to-mock-your-MSFrontpage-reference
>
> I've he
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:56:27PM +0200 or thereabouts, Joost De Cock wrote:
> On Monday 07 June 2004 15:31, jack kinnon hurled the following on the wire:
> > Hi
> > Thanks for the input. What I am referring to is
> > something like the MS FrontPage, not just an ordinary
> > editor.
>
> must-sup
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 09:56, Joost De Cock wrote:
> On Monday 07 June 2004 15:31, jack kinnon hurled the following on the wire:
> > Hi
> > Thanks for the input. What I am referring to is
> > something like the MS FrontPage, not just an ordinary
> > editor.
>
> must-suppress-urge-to-mock-your-MSFr
On Monday 07 June 2004 15:31, jack kinnon hurled the following on the wire:
> Hi
> Thanks for the input. What I am referring to is
> something like the MS FrontPage, not just an ordinary
> editor.
must-suppress-urge-to-mock-your-MSFrontpage-reference
I've heard good things about Bluefish, bu
Hi
Thanks for the input. What I am referring to is
something like the MS FrontPage, not just an ordinary
editor.
Cheers
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRI
60 matches
Mail list logo
