Re: Web server access

On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 01:17 -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > I am able to reach The Van Snyder's Web Site using the above IP > address and URL on port 80 but not 443. I got a certificate error on > 443.  I've never before set up a secure server. I followed instructions at a web page, whose UR

Re: Web server access

On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:12 PM Van Snyder wrote: > On Tue, 2025-04-01 at 20:00 -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 7:57 PM Van Snyder > wrote: > > This might be the wrong forum for this question, but most likely somebody > can tell me a better place. > > I have a w

Re: Web server access

On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 03:55:08PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > debian-u...@howorth.org.uk (HE12025-04-02): > > Well, practically it makes no difference. If I send with or without an > > HTTP version I get the same Bad Request response. And it makes no > > difference whether I use HTTP/1.0 or HTT

Re: Web server access SOLVED

d my IP Tables cheat sheet. If you need any help feel free to ask. Tim > On Tue, 2025-04-01 at 18:07 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > > Forwarded Message > *From*: jeremy ardley > > *To*: debian-user@lists.debian.org > *Subject*: Re: Web server access > *Date*

Re: OT: Re: Web server access

On 4/3/25 21:43, Van Snyder wrote: On Thu, 2025-04-03 at 15:16 +0200, john doe wrote: On 4/3/25 01:19, Van Snyder wrote: On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 15:24 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: I added port 443 only because my router converted the port 80 request to a port 443 request. I eventually worked

Re: OT: Re: Web server access

On Thu, 2025-04-03 at 15:16 +0200, john doe wrote: > On 4/3/25 01:19, Van Snyder wrote: > > On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 15:24 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > > > > I added port 443 only because my router converted the port 80 > > request > > to a port 443 request. I eventually worked out the reason f

OT: Re: Web server access

On 4/3/25 01:19, Van Snyder wrote: On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 15:24 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: I added port 443 only because my router converted the port 80 request to a port 443 request. I eventually worked out the reason for that was because my server had started running a firewall that blocke

Re: Web server access

On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 15:24 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > I got a security error too. It says the problem is that the > > certificate > > is self-signed. I have no idea what that means or how to repair it. > > *If* you want to go down this road, the simplest way is to install > one > of the "

Re: Web server access

On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 3:24 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 12:03:32 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > > On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 11:25 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > > > On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 01:17 -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > > > > I am able to reach The Van Snyder's Web Site usin

Re: Web server access

On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 11:25 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 01:17 -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > > I am able to reach The Van Snyder's Web Site using the above IP > > address and URL on port 80 but not 443. I got a certificate error > > on 443.  > > I've never before set up

Re: Web server access

On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 12:03:32 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 11:25 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > > On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 01:17 -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > > > I am able to reach The Van Snyder's Web Site using the above IP > > > address and URL on port 80 but not 443. I

Re: Web server access

debian-u...@howorth.org.uk (HE12025-04-02): > Well, practically it makes no difference. If I send with or without an > HTTP version I get the same Bad Request response. And it makes no > difference whether I use HTTP/1.0 or HTTP/1.1. Does it make a difference if you send CRLF instead of LF, as Tom

Re: Web server access

Am 02.04.25 um 14:01 schrieb debian-u...@howorth.org.uk: > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:04:17AM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk >> wrote: >> >> >>> GET index.html >> >> should be: >> >> GET index.html HTTP/1.0 >> >> (Strictly speaking you should close off with twice , but >> most web

Re: Web server access

On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 8:01 AM wrote: > > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:04:17AM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk > > wrote: > > > > > > > GET index.html > > > > should be: > > > > GET index.html HTTP/1.0 > > > > (Strictly speaking you should close off with twice , but > > most web server

Re: Web server access

wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:04:17AM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk > wrote: > > > > GET index.html > > should be: > > GET index.html HTTP/1.0 > > (Strictly speaking you should close off with twice , but > most web servers are tolerant if you just send two ) > > Not sending a HTT

Re: Web server access

Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 17:52:55 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > > The server is on the LAN side of the router (192.168.1.65). It's > > not in the DMZ. My server isn't running Apache ACLs or iptables or > > TCP wrapper. The router is running a firewall.  I've forwarded > > WAN-si

Re: Web server access

On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 13:01:10 +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:04:17AM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk > > wrote: > > > GET index.html > > > > should be: > > > > GET index.html HTTP/1.0 > > Well, practically it makes no difference. If I sen

Re: Web server access

On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:04:17AM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: > GET index.html should be: GET index.html HTTP/1.0 (Strictly speaking you should close off with twice , but most web servers are tolerant if you just send two ) Not sending a HTTP version in your request /is/ a bad r

Re: Web server access SOLVED

gt; > Tim > Sorry here is the attachment for IP version 4. > > >> On Tue, 2025-04-01 at 18:07 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: >> >> Forwarded Message >> *From*: jeremy ardley > > >> *To*: debian-user@lists.debian.org >> *Subject*: Re: Web s

Re: Web server access

On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 1:12 AM Van Snyder wrote: > On Tue, 2025-04-01 at 21:03 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 17:52:55 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > > The server is on the LAN side of the router (192.168.1.65). It's not in > the DMZ. My server isn't running Apache ACLs or ip

Re: Web server access SOLVED

On Tue, 01 Apr 2025 18:19:55 -0700 Van Snyder wrote: > I disabled firewalld because I have no idea how to configure it, but > my Linksys router is running a firewall that's really easy to > configure. firewall-config for GUI operation. firewalld comes with a command line (and scriptable) tool ca

Re: Web server access SOLVED

On 02/04/2025 11:49 am, Van Snyder wrote: > I disabled firewalld because I have no idea how to configure it, but > my Linksys router is running a firewall that's really easy to configure. For next time you get a connectivity issue like this..  If you are sure the linksys router box is passing t

Re: Web server access SOLVED

ld. On Tue, 2025-04-01 at 18:07 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > Forwarded Message > From: jeremy ardley > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Web server access > Date: 04/01/2025 05:29:23 PM > > > On 2/4/25 08:21, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: >

Re: Web server access

On Tue, 2025-04-01 at 21:03 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 17:52:55 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > > The server is on the LAN side of the router (192.168.1.65). It's > > not in > > the DMZ. My server isn't running Apache ACLs or iptables or TCP > > wrapper. The router is running

Re: Web server access

Forwarded Message From: jeremy ardley To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Web server access Date: 04/01/2025 05:29:23 PM On 2/4/25 08:21, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > > Ok so if I understand you correctly then you are attempting to port > forward 8

Re: Web server access

On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 17:52:55 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > The server is on the LAN side of the router (192.168.1.65). It's not in > the DMZ. My server isn't running Apache ACLs or iptables or TCP > wrapper. The router is running a firewall.  I've forwarded WAN-side > ports 23, 80 and 443 to my se

Re: Web server access

On Tue, 2025-04-01 at 20:21 -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > Ok so if I understand you correctly then you are attempting to port > forward 80 and 443 through the router's WAN Wide Area Network > interface to a server located in the DMZ DeMilitarized Zone. Does the > server have Apache ACL's, I

Re: Web server access

On 2/4/25 08:21, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: Ok so if I understand you correctly then you are attempting to port forward 80 and 443 through the router's WAN Wide Area Network interface to a server located in the DMZ DeMilitarized Zone. Does the server have Apache ACL's, IP Tables or TCP wr

Re: Web server access

On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 7:57 PM Van Snyder wrote: > This might be the wrong forum for this question, but most likely somebody > can tell me a better place. > > I have a web server listening to port 80 (http) and 443 (https). > > I can load pages from it from any computer in my house, all behind th

Re: Web server access

On Tue, 2025-04-01 at 22:30 +0200, john doe wrote: > On 4/1/25 21:10, Van Snyder wrote: > > I have a web server listening to port 80 (http) and 443 (https). > > > > I can load pages from it from any computer in my house, all behind > > the > > same router, using its IP number. > > > > I enabled p

Re: Web server access

On 4/1/25 21:10, Van Snyder wrote: I have a web server listening to port 80 (http) and 443 (https). I can load pages from it from any computer in my house, all behind the same router, using its IP number. I enabled port forwarding in the DMZ in my router for ports 80 and 443. I can't load page

Re: web server for development

On 2020-01-18 20:09, Russell L. Harris wrote: On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 07:21:43PM +0100, deloptes wrote: mick crane wrote: I scp the files to a temp directory in my home directory on the server then ssh into the server, su to root, change the permissions and ownerships of the files then move th

Re: web server for development

On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 07:21:43PM +0100, deloptes wrote: mick crane wrote: I scp the files to a temp directory in my home directory on the server then ssh into the server, su to root, change the permissions and ownerships of the files then move them to /var/www/html/ for testing I usually con

Re: web server for development

mick crane wrote: > It's a bit convoluted. > I scp the files to a temp directory in my home directory on the server > then ssh into the server, su to root, change the permissions and > ownerships of the files then move them to /var/www/html/ for testing I usually configure something meaningful in

Re: web server for development

On 2020-01-09 06:16, Russell L. Harris wrote: For development of a web pages, I installed Apache2 on another machine in the LAN so that I can FTP web pages from the development machine to the web server and view the pages from the development machine. But the installation of Apache2 on Buster se

Re: web server for development

Russell L. Harris wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 07:56:41PM +0530, rajudev wrote: >> This is what I use when I am testing something on my local machine >> $ python3 -m http.server > > Thanks. Someone previously mentioned a phython server built into > hugo, but did not give details. ah, i didn

Re: web server for development

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 07:56:41PM +0530, rajudev wrote: This is what I use when I am testing something on my local machine $ python3 -m http.server Thanks. Someone previously mentioned a phython server built into hugo, but did not give details. This serves my need, and saves time by circumve

Re: web server for development

On ९/१/२० ११:४६ म.पू., Russell L. Harris wrote: > For development of a web pages, I installed Apache2 on another machine > in the LAN so that I can FTP web pages from the development machine to > the web server and view the pages from the development machine. > > But the installation of Apache2 on

Re: web server for development

There's also sftp. It's in the openssh-client package. Thanks; I see that it is loaded, and I just printed out the man page. ... a Windows person Them's fighting words... Or mounting the directory using sshfs (which is an SFTP client) and then using your local file management tools. sshf

Re: web server for development

To be honest, I'd forgotten about SSH FTP as it isn't something of the suite that I ever use. FTPS is the correct protocol that I use with Filezilla and with an automated script that uploads my weather data every five minutes to the Web host. - Nate -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in t

Re: web server for development

On 1/10/2020 5:52 PM, Russell L. Harris wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 09:54:34AM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: >>> ... whether rsync is an option. >> Sure, as long as you run it over ssh.  The default in Debian is to >> run rsync over ssh, but it can also be explicitly invoked that way: >> rsync -av

Re: web server for development

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 04:52:36PM +, Russell L. Harris wrote: > For shared hosting, Hostgator offers: > > (1) SFTP (SSH FTP, port 22) > (2) FTPS (FTP over SSL or TLS, port 21) > (3) SSH (ssh -p cpanel...@ip.add.re.ss) OK, that's quite reasonable. > Searching packages in the Debian 9 (S

Re: web server for development

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 09:54:34AM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: ... whether rsync is an option. Sure, as long as you run it over ssh. The default in Debian is to run rsync over ssh, but it can also be explicitly invoked that way: rsync -av --rsh=ssh host::module /dest rsync -av -e "ssh -l ssh-user"

Re: web server for development

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 02:29:51PM -, Dan Purgert wrote: >> SFTP (SSH) has basically zero to do with RFC959 FTP; and provided that a >> target host already allows SSH logins, SFTP is quite likely already >> there. I'm actu

Re: web server for development

Russell L. Harris wrote: > > But now it seems that my first concern should be with FTP to the > server of Hostgator. And in the case of a remote shared server, I > question whether rsync is an option. Sure, as long as you run it over ssh. The default in Debian is to run rsync over ssh, but it

Re: web server for development

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 02:29:51PM -, Dan Purgert wrote: > SFTP (SSH) has basically zero to do with RFC959 FTP; and provided that a > target host already allows SSH logins, SFTP is quite likely already > there. I'm actually surprised a hosting party would recommend RFC-959 > FTP at all (SSL or

Re: web server for development

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Nate Bargmann wrote: > [...] > I would ask if their Web host supports Secure FTP, which is FTP using > SSL, AIUI. I use it for my Web Host updates, in fact it was recommended > by the host owner/ope

Re: web server for development

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 06:22:00PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * On 2020 09 Jan 14:29 -0600, Russell L. Harris wrote: > > But now it seems that my first concern should be with FTP to the > > server of Hostgator. And in the case of a remote shared server, I > > question whether rsync is an option

Re: web server for development

* On 2020 09 Jan 14:29 -0600, Russell L. Harris wrote: > But now it seems that my first concern should be with FTP to the > server of Hostgator. And in the case of a remote shared server, I > question whether rsync is an option. I would ask if their Web host supports Secure FTP, which is FTP usin

Re: web server for development

In this message, I respond to several suggestions: On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 08:37:12AM -0500, Greg Wooledge & others wrote: One way would be: https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_userdir.html I thank you for the link. More as an alternative to apache on an another host: - using the buil

Re: web server for development

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 01:40:49PM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: Greg Wooledge wrote: If a web/storage provider doesn't offer at *least* SFTP access in 2020, it's time to find a new provider. https://www.hostgator.com/help/article/secure-ftp-sftp-and-ftps TL;DR: they support SFTP, which is appropr

Re: web server for development

Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 06:29:57PM +, Russell L. Harris wrote: > > But I do have a web hosting account with Hostgator which provides > > shared hosting; and I am not aware of a mechanism other than FTP to > > get web content from here to that remote server. > > If a web

Re: web server for development

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 06:29:57PM +, Russell L. Harris wrote: > But I do have a web hosting account with Hostgator which provides > shared hosting; and I am not aware of a mechanism other than FTP to > get web content from here to that remote server. If a web/storage provider doesn't offer at

Re: web server for development

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 06:16:51AM +, Russell L. Harris wrote: > For development of a web pages, I installed Apache2 on another machine > in the LAN so that I can FTP web pages from the development machine to > the web server and view the pages from the development machine. > > But the install

Re: web server for development

On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 06:16 +, Russell L. Harris wrote: > For development of a web pages, I installed Apache2 on another machine > in the LAN so that I can FTP web pages from the development machine to > the web server and view the pages from the development machine. Do your pages use any serv

Re: web server for development

On 1/9/2020 7:16 AM, Russell L. Harris wrote: > For development of a web pages, I installed Apache2 on another machine > in the LAN so that I can FTP web pages from the development machine to > the web server and view the pages from the development machine. > > But the installation of Apache2 on Bu

Re: web server migration

On 12/11/2011 10:40 AM, Avi Greenbury wrote: Basically, I would: * Manually install the packages on the new machine. You can use dpkg --set-selections and friends, but for just a website you're probably looking at<10 packages and here's a good chance to not also install everything you

Re: web server migration

steve reilly wrote: > question. how would YOU do it with minimal hassle, ie. having to > edit config files, databases and such. this thing has been running > since etch and been a learning process along the way i doubt my > idea of cloning would work, but? If they're relatively small and s

Re: web server migration

On 12/11/2011 02:58 AM, Alan Chandler wrote: Although my explanation may seem quite complex, it works out as really useful tidy way to manage sites. They always need updating from time to time and it is quite hard to remember all the details if you work with lots of different sites. With my mech

Re: web server migration

On 12/11/2011 03:47 AM, bruno.deb...@cyberoso.com wrote: I would first move to some virtualisation in order to make the next migration easier (I am currently using OpenVz containers with Proxmox ditro, but there are many others out there) thats something i didnt think of, thanks, ill look at i

Re: web server migration

Le Sat, 10 Dec 2011 18:46:56 -0500, steve reilly a écrit : > On 12/10/2011 05:38 PM, Mark Neidorff wrote: > > More information needed, please. You said that your desktop > > machine is running lenny. > > yes, it is. > > > > I'll start with a few questions and let other folks add theirs > >

Re: web server migration

On 10/12/11 22:26, steve reilly wrote: good afternoon looking for input on moving a couple small family websites from a desktop machine running lenny to a poweredge 4600 I just bought. poweredge has two 73gb scsi drives, perc3 embedded raid. in process of formatting drives, and then setting up c

Re: web server migration

steve reilly wrote: looking for input on moving a couple small family websites from a desktop machine running lenny to a poweredge 4600 I just bought. poweredge has two 73gb scsi drives, perc3 embedded raid. in process of formatting drives, and then setting up container. desktop has a 300gb dr

Re: web server migration

On 12/10/2011 05:38 PM, Mark Neidorff wrote: More information needed, please. You said that your desktop machine is running lenny. yes, it is. I'll start with a few questions and let other folks add theirs 1. Do you want to try squeeze on the poweredge or stay with lenny? Is the hardwa

Re: web server migration

More information needed, please. You said that your desktop machine is running lenny. I'll start with a few questions and let other folks add theirs 1. Do you want to try squeeze on the poweredge or stay with lenny? Is the hardware in the server supported in lenny or do you have to use

Re: Web server on Debian ARM

Michael Kurecka writes: > deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ etch main contrib non-free You should upgrade to Lenny. In any case, here is a link you may find useful: -- John Hasler j...@dhh.gt.org Elmwood, WI USA

Re: Web server on Debian ARM

Michael Kurecka writes: > What do you mean by installing from the Debian archive? Did you use the Debian package-management system to install it, pulling it from a Debian CD or a Debian mirror, or did you get it somewhere else? Debian provides both Apache and Tomcat packages for ARM. -- John Has

Re: Web server on Debian ARM

On Wednesday 26 August 2009 14:45:52 Michael Kurecka wrote: > What do you mean by installing from the Debian archive? FAIL! Have you ever run Debian before? Have ever used apt-get or aptitude? Have you ever modified your /etc/apt/sources.list or files under /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ ? Might o

Re: Web server on Debian ARM

What do you mean by installing from the Debian archive?

Re: Web server on Debian ARM

Michael Kurecka writes: > I've tried getting Apache and Tomcat to work on my board. If you installed them from the Debian archive they should just work. If not file bugs. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: Web server on Debian ARM

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 14:06, Michael Kurecka wrote: > I've tried getting Apache and Tomcat to work on my board. The board is a > Compulab CM-X270 with debian version 2.6.24 run on a 32 bit ARM processor. > What types of web servers can I put on this thing? It came with THTTPD but > that seems to

Re: Web Server on Mac SE/30

On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 09:55:14PM -0500, Barry Skidmore wrote: > I have had Debian (woody) running on this Mac SE/30 for > some time now, and decided to try establishing a small > web site using Apache. > > The site is now up: http://www.macconnection.net > > The purpose of the site is just to p

Re: Web server with PHP setup & mod-ssl

Danny O'Brien wrote: Thanks for the response. I took the action you suggested -- but I didn't delete the previous /etc/apache/httpd.conf file. Now, instead of showing my site on a Web page, my browser treats the main PHP page as a file download and dumps the file to my desktop. Should I remo

Re: Web server with PHP setup & mod-ssl

Thanks for the response. I took the action you suggested -- but I didn't delete the previous /etc/apache/httpd.conf file. Now, instead of showing my site on a Web page, my browser treats the main PHP page as a file download and dumps the file to my desktop. Should I remove apache-ssl, wipe the ht

Re: Web server with PHP setup & mod-ssl

Danny O'Brien wrote: I'm rebuilding a web server with a home-grown PHP site that allows users to log in securely, to view, upload, and download files. This is my first real foray into Debian. Here's the spec: Kernel2.4.18-bf2.4 Apache1.3.26-0woo openssl0.9.6c-2.wo postgres7.2.1-2wood php4.1.

Re: Web server with PHP setup & mod-ssl

On 2004-01-29, Danny O'Brien penned: > > --Apple-Mail-1-451834990 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: > text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > > I'm rebuilding a web server with a home-grown PHP site that allows > users to log in securely, to view, upload, and download files. Thi

RE: Web server with PHP setup & mod-ssl

  -Original Message-From: Danny O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:19 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Web server with PHP setup & mod-ssl      - does "apt-get upgrade" always provide the most secure versions? The reason I ask is:

Re: Web server with PHP setup & mod-ssl

On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:03:19PM -0500, Danny O'Brien wrote: > Here's the spec: > > Kernel2.4.18-bf2.4 > Apache1.3.26-0woo > openssl0.9.6c-2.wo > postgres7.2.1-2wood > php4.1.2-6wood > > My questions: > > - does "apt-get upgrade" always provide the most secure versions? The > reason I

Re: Web server Partitions - /tmp

On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > but ... if "/tmp" accidentally mounted under root fs instead of separate > > partition, than i consider the box as having gone bonkers and "not > > working right" > > There's "not working right" (in which case I agree), and there's "not > working

Re: Web server Partitions - /tmp

on Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 12:32:26PM -0800, Alvin Oga ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Karsten M. Self wrote: You left off full attributions: > > Alvin Oga wrote: > > > if /tmp is a separate partition and it cannot mount it during bootup, > > > nothing will work right if the ap

Re: Web server Partitions - /tmp

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > I was thinking about this idea, so /tmp is on raid. Now temp dies, and you > > > reboot, and now apache won't start? > > > > > > if /tmp is a separate partition and it cannot mount it during bootup, > > nothing will work right if the app depend

Re: Web server Partitions - me

on Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:07:47AM -0800, Alvin Oga ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Lucas Albers wrote: > > > > > > > hi ya andrew > > > raid can break due to: > > > - (1) disk failures > > > - the silly system takes forever ( dayz ) to resync itself > > > - too many

Re: Web server Partitions - reiserfs

Alvin Oga said: >> I was hoping reiser could give me better redundancy. > > supposed to be better > - i assume yoy dont mean "redundancy" but that you dont > want to wait around for fsck checks of the fs after > accidental or silly or testing power off > > xfs or jfs supposed to

Re: Web server Partitions - me

whatup alvin, Alvin Oga said: >> I think I'm just going to put spare backup disk in the system. > > usually simpler to use 1 disk for spare.. as long as everythng > fit and you dont have to worry about any config errors > >> >> I've found that some volumes just break sync, >> I have a raid 5 parti

Re: Web server Partitions

Karsten M. Self said: > However, reiserfs (as other journaled filesystems) *does* require > storage space for the journal file. Which on a smallish root filesystem > takes up a significant amount of space (32 MiB, IIRC, for reiserfs). > Reiser uses a fixed size journal file, while ext3's is eithe

Re: Web server Partitions

on Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:48:45AM -0700, Lucas Albers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > on Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:38:50PM +1000, Braxton Neate > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > >> I'm wondering what other people would recommend in the way of > >> partitioning? > >> > > http://kmself.home.netco

Re: Web server Partitions

on Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:54:28AM -0700, Lucas Albers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > See generally my guide previously posted. > > > > Use LVM. > > > this guide: > http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/partition.html > > Mentions that you should not use reiserfs as your boot partition? Note t

Re: Web server Partitions - reiserfs

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Lucas Albers wrote: > > Alvin Oga said: > > reiserfs-3.6 w/ linux-2.4.23 seems to work fine ( normally ) now for > > / and lilo and everything else ( using it daily ) > > prior versions/combinations i tried failed miserably > Have you notices any corruption using reise

Re: Web server Partitions - me

hi ya lucas On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Lucas Albers wrote: > What I meant, was if it is a partition size the resync will occur faster > then if it is a giant partition size. makes no difference ... "100GB of data to sync" is 100GB of data no matter how small .. but if you spread 100GB to 20GB each

Re: Web server Partitions - reiserfs

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Lucas Albers wrote: > Mentions that you should not use reiserfs as your boot partition? > Can you extrapolate, I've used reiserfs as my boot partiton with no > problems, and would be interested in what you have encountered: > > "The only significant consideration here was t

Re: Web server Partitions - me

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Lucas Albers wrote: > > > > hi ya andrew > > raid can break due to: > > - (1) disk failures > > - the silly system takes forever ( dayz ) to resync itself > > - too many disks failures renders the entire raid useless > > or the system can be on a non-raided d

Re: Web server Partitions - reiserfs

Alvin Oga said: > reiserfs-3.6 w/ linux-2.4.23 seems to work fine ( normally ) now for > / and lilo and everything else ( using it daily ) > prior versions/combinations i tried failed miserably Have you notices any corruption using reiserfs, does it sync a lot faster on reboots compared to

Re: Web server Partitions - me

Alvin Oga said: >> I've decided to start making my raid >> syncs into smaller sizes, so they can resync back faster. > > the size of the "raid" has NOTHING to do with "resync" faster in general > > the number of files and data that have to be sync between the > degraded raid and the newly inserte

Re: Web server Partitions

> See generally my guide previously posted. > > Use LVM. > this guide: http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/partition.html Mentions that you should not use reiserfs as your boot partition? Can you extrapolate, I've used reiserfs as my boot partiton with no problems, and would be interested in

Re: Web server Partitions

> on Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:38:50PM +1000, Braxton Neate > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> I'm wondering what other people would recommend in the way of >> partitioning? >> > http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/partition.html You mentioned thus their: "Mount options typically restrict fe

Re: Web server Partitions

> > hi ya andrew > raid can break due to: > - (1) disk failures > - the silly system takes forever ( dayz ) to resync itself > - too many disks failures renders the entire raid useless > or the system can be on a non-raided disk and raid5 for data only > - have

Re: Web server Partitions - swap

on Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:46:38AM +0100, Magnus von Koeller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Content-Description: signed data > On Wednesday 17 December 2003 00:55, Alvin Oga wrote: > > in the old days ?memory was say 4K total ... > > Yeah, I was just wondering because on my laptop, complete with

Re: Web server Partitions

John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bijan Soleymani writes: >> Many programs are huge but only small parts of them need to be in memory >> the rest can be maintained in swap. > > Executables are not swapped out. They don't need to be because they are > not altered and so can just be read ba

Re: web server

On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 21:25, Gruessle wrote: > How about apache is it installed too? > How can I html in to my Debian with my win2000 PC use "apachectl start" on debian and then on a windows box go to "http://ipaddress"; where "ipaddress" is the IP of your debian box -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Web server Partitions

on Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:23:50PM +0100, Magnus von Koeller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Content-Description: signed data > On Tuesday 16 December 2003 22:12, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > SWAP - 1.5GB > > > > Rule of thumb: ?1-2x RAM. > > I never understood that rule... In what way does it make sen

  1   2   >