On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:16:17AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 04 aug 14, 14:58:15, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> > I'm still not sure why it isn't in testing at
> > the moment,
>
> http://tracker.debian.org/encfs and click on the question mark next to
>
> The package has not entered testi
On Lu, 04 aug 14, 14:58:15, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> I'm still not sure why it isn't in testing at
> the moment,
http://tracker.debian.org/encfs and click on the question mark next to
The package has not entered testing even though the delay is over
The rest should be self-explanatory.
> but
B writes:
> On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 18:10:10 -0600
> Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> Do you have more information on encfs being declared a security
>> hazard? Your post is the first I've heard of it.
>
> http://defuse.ca/audits/encfs.htm
> (You'll note that dangerous attack vectors are quite low).
Ah
Mike Kupfer writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> I guess encfs and its companion on windows of truecrypt have been
>> declared serious security hazards... encfs is not even available .. at
>> least in jessie repos.
>>
>> What are people using as a replacement? Hopefully something as easy
>> to us
B writes:
> On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 18:10:10 -0600
> Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> Do you have more information on encfs being declared a security
>> hazard? Your post is the first I've heard of it.
>
> http://defuse.ca/audits/encfs.htm
> (You'll note that dangerous attack vectors are quite low).
Ga
Joe Pfeiffer writes:
>> Harry Putnam wrote:
>>
>>> I guess encfs and its companion on windows of truecrypt have been
>>> declared serious security hazards... encfs is not even available .. at
>>> least in jessie repos.
>>>
>>> What are people using as a replacement? Hopefully something as easy
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 18:10:10 -0600
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Do you have more information on encfs being declared a security
> hazard? Your post is the first I've heard of it.
http://defuse.ca/audits/encfs.htm
(You'll note that dangerous attack vectors are quite low).
--
Nico : my little brother wa
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> I guess encfs and its companion on windows of truecrypt have been
>> declared serious security hazards... encfs is not even available .. at
>> least in jessie repos.
>>
>> What are people using as a replacement? Hopefully something as easy
>> to use and encfs was.
Do y
Harry Putnam wrote:
> I guess encfs and its companion on windows of truecrypt have been
> declared serious security hazards... encfs is not even available .. at
> least in jessie repos.
>
> What are people using as a replacement? Hopefully something as easy
> to use and encfs was.
I've been usi
9 matches
Mail list logo