Bzzzz <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 18:10:10 -0600 > Joe Pfeiffer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do you have more information on encfs being declared a security >> hazard? Your post is the first I've heard of it. > > http://defuse.ca/audits/encfs.htm > (You'll note that dangerous attack vectors are quite low).
Ah, OK -- I'd seen that (I'm on the encfs list), but there's a ways from what that audit turned up to saying it's a security hazard and making reference to its demise. I'm still not sure why it isn't in testing at the moment, but as long as it's in both stable and unstable I'm not going to worry too much. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
