Felix Miata wrote:
> Maybe people should be allowed to choose a MUA based on whether its
> entire feature set best meets their overall needs.
Maybe people who choose to use an MUA which is deficient in one area or
another should complain to the authors of the MUA about said deficiencies
instea
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2005-12-18 07:33:53, schrieb Felix Miata:
> > This is a public discussion list, not a public questions/private answers
> > list. You can't have a public discussion when people make their replies
> > private.
> Maybe you should use a RFC-Compliant MUA
> which suppo
Am 2005-12-18 07:33:53, schrieb Felix Miata:
> That's only one admin's opinion. I find the opposite superior:
> http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
>
> This is a public discussion list, not a public questions/private answers
> list. You can't have a public discussion when people
Felix Miata wrote:
> The default (passive) choice to a public discussion list should always
> be to the list, requiring no more thought than choosing to reply at all.
> Choosing not to reply to the group should require an active choice, not
> a passive choice. Private replies add nothing to the dis
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Felix Miata wrote:
> >> This is a public discussion list, not a public questions/private answers
> >> list. You can't have a public discussion when people make their replies
> >> private.
> And it is up to the individual on how they wish to reply. Quite frankly
> if s
On 2005-12-18, Felix Miata penned:
>
> That's only one admin's opinion. I find the opposite superior:
> http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
>
> This is a public discussion list, not a public questions/private
> answers list. You can't have a public discussion when people make
> th
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:36:10 -0800
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some software does honor list-post and those that don't often have a bug
filed against it for failing to do so.
How comes traditional *nix mailers can handle non-munging AND munging correctly
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:36:10 -0800
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some software does honor list-post and those that don't often have a bug
> filed against it for failing to do so.
How comes traditional *nix mailers can handle non-munging AND munging correctly
and newer clients (of
On 12/19/05, Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
> > business. The [b]sender[/b] gets to choose.
>
> This is the result of too much time posting to phpbb forums. Mia culpa!
Could be worse. You could have written:
The
.B sender
gets to choose.
--
Michael A. Marsh
http:
Steve Lamb wrote:
> business. The [b]sender[/b] gets to choose.
This is the result of too much time posting to phpbb forums. Mia culpa!
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of soul
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> That's only one admin's opinion. I find the opposite superior:
>> http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
Felix (I know, I'm replying to Mike but attribution is corerct here), this
page is simply outdated. It references 822 and was wri
Gabriel wrote:
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:11:43PM -0300, Gabriel wrote:
And please, I know sometimes happens, but send the replys to the list.
That's why we all should add a reply-to field on the messages we send
to the list. (although I forgot to do this with this messag
Felix Miata wrote:
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:11:43PM -0300, Gabriel wrote:
And please, I know sometimes happens, but send the replys to the list.
That's why we all should add a reply-to field on the messages we send
to the list. (although I forgot to do this with this
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:11:43PM -0300, Gabriel wrote:
And please, I know sometimes happens, but send the replys to the list.
That's why we all should add a reply-to field on the messages we send
to the list. (although I forgot to do this with this message :-P)
No, we sh
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:11:43PM -0300, Gabriel wrote:
And please, I know sometimes happens, but send the replys to the list.
That's why we all should add a reply-to field on the messages we send
to the list. (although I forgot to do this with this message :-P)
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 07:33:53AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> Jon Dowland wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:11:43PM -0300, Gabriel wrote:
>
> > > And please, I know sometimes happens, but send the replys to the list.
> > > That's why we all should add a reply-to field on the messages we s
Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:11:43PM -0300, Gabriel wrote:
> > And please, I know sometimes happens, but send the replys to the list.
> > That's why we all should add a reply-to field on the messages we send
> > to the list. (although I forgot to do this with this message :-P)
17 matches
Mail list logo
