On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 07:33:53AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > Jon Dowland wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:11:43PM -0300, Gabriel wrote: > > > > And please, I know sometimes happens, but send the replys to the list. > > > That's why we all should add a reply-to field on the messages we send > > > to the list. (although I forgot to do this with this message :-P) > > > No, we shouldn't :) See archives for various long arguments on the > > subject of Reply-To: munging. The rationale behind not doing so (as > > applied by this list) is available at > > <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>. > > That's only one admin's opinion. I find the opposite superior: > http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html > > This is a public discussion list, not a public questions/private answers > list. You can't have a public discussion when people make their replies > private.
This has been discussed to death already, and isn't going to change unless *everyone* thinks it should. If you care about it a lot, then I think I posted a procmail snippet that would rewrite the reply-to header locally last time this was discussed. Pete > -- > Jesus Christ is the reason for the season. > > Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 > > Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/ > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
