Re: new first for Sid

2011-02-07 Thread Slicky Johnson
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:12:05 -0500 Slicky Johnson wrote: > > I'm guessing you were blind sided because you have 'testing' in your > source.list rather than a code name ie squeeze|wheezy. If that is > indeed the case you should change your habits. It's no different than > if you're running Sid at

Re: new first for Sid

2011-02-07 Thread Slicky Johnson
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:13:08 -0500 Slicky Johnson wrote: > aptitude safe-upgrade breaks/hangs with the following... > > > > patch (2.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > > The options -U --unified-reject-files and --global-reject-file have > now been removed. > > -- Christoph Berg Sun, 06 Feb

Re: new first for Sid

2011-02-07 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <20110207141308.15de62d9@t61.debian-linux>, Slicky Johnson wrote: >aptitude safe-upgrade breaks/hangs with the following... > >patch (2.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > > The options -U --unified-reject-files and --global-reject-file have now >been removed. > > -- Christoph Berg Sun, 06 Feb 201

Re: new first for Sid

2011-02-07 Thread Javier Vasquez
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Slicky Johnson wrote: > On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:13:08 -0500 > Slicky Johnson wrote: > >> aptitude safe-upgrade breaks/hangs with the following... >> >> >> >> patch (2.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low >> >>   The options -U --unified-reject-files and --global-reject-file

Re: new first for Sid

2011-02-07 Thread Slicky Johnson
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:13:08 -0500 Slicky Johnson wrote: > aptitude safe-upgrade breaks/hangs with the following... > > > > patch (2.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > > The options -U --unified-reject-files and --global-reject-file have > now been removed. > > -- Christoph Berg Sun, 06 Feb