Hi,
On 02/14/2017 12:58 AM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Some time ago I read that Linux 4.x incorporates the feature to be
> updated without requiring a restart of the operating system.
They incorporated parts of that. There are still some unsolved issues.
See for example this article from last Nove
Hi, Sven.
On 14/02/17 10:19, Sven Hartge wrote:
> He thinks of mechanisms like ksplice or kpatch where you can
> alter/patch the running kernel without rebooting the system.
Yes, I had read some about this and that, for example, Ubuntu has it
available but as a paid service that one can hire. W
Hi, Darac.
On 14/02/17 10:01, Darac Marjal wrote:
>>> Some time ago I read that Linux 4.x incorporates the feature to be
>>> updated without requiring a restart of the operating system.
>> Some Linux Distributions have such a feature. Debian is not one of them.
> Actually, yes it is, you just n
Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 01:46:08PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Daniel Bareiro wrote:
>>> Some time ago I read that Linux 4.x incorporates the feature to be
>>> updated without requiring a restart of the operating system.
>> Some Linux Distributions have such a feature. De
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 01:46:08PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Some time ago I read that Linux 4.x incorporates the feature to be
updated without requiring a restart of the operating system.
Some Linux Distributions have such a feature. Debian is not one of them.
Actual
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Some time ago I read that Linux 4.x incorporates the feature to be
> updated without requiring a restart of the operating system.
Some Linux Distributions have such a feature. Debian is not one of them.
Grüße,
Sven.
--
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 22:53:57 AG wrote:
> On 17/06/10 07:26, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > On 2010-06-17 00:35 +0200, AG wrote:
> >> Since the last testing update I have rebooted and found myself being
> >> ensnarled in what seems to be a kernel issue, whereby a module
> >> "nouveau" by default seiz
On 2010-06-17 08:53 +0200, AG wrote:
> But that is good to know that nouveau gets blacklisted automatically
> using that method. I wonder why it has been included in the vanilla
> kernel in the first place - it certainly was a nasty surprise!
Because it is necessary for the nouveau X video drive
On 17/06/10 07:26, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-06-17 00:35 +0200, AG wrote:
Since the last testing update I have rebooted and found myself being
ensnarled in what seems to be a kernel issue, whereby a module
"nouveau" by default seizes control of the graphics card which
prevents the nVidia
On 2010-06-17 00:35 +0200, AG wrote:
> Since the last testing update I have rebooted and found myself being
> ensnarled in what seems to be a kernel issue, whereby a module
> "nouveau" by default seizes control of the graphics card which
> prevents the nVidia driver from loading.
If you had insta
On 23:35 Wed 16 Jun , AG wrote:
> I pass this along and hope that this helps anyone who finds
> themselves similarly disposed.
this also bit a number of others on the list. If you see my post, I banned the
nouveau module
from my kernel as well as the nouveau packages from xxorg-* and then bui
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:03:56 -0500 (EST), Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:14:12 -0500 (EST), Stephen Powell wrote:
>> The
>>
>>aptitude update
>>aptitude full-upgrade
>>
>> sequence does not replace a binary kernel directly, no.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> I should clarify that point,
Stephen Powell schreef:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:14:12 -0500 (EST), Stephen Powell wrote:
The
aptitude update
aptitude full-upgrade
sequence does not replace a binary kernel directly, no.
I should clarify that point, lest someone quote me out of context.
It *will* replace a binary *stock
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:14:12 -0500 (EST), Stephen Powell wrote:
> The
>
>aptitude update
>aptitude full-upgrade
>
> sequence does not replace a binary kernel directly, no.
I should clarify that point, lest someone quote me out of context.
It *will* replace a binary *stock* kernel directl
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:42:51 -0500 (EST), Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Stephen Powell put forth on 2/14/2010 8:50 PM:
>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:53:11 -0500 (EST), Jim Pazarena wrote:
>>>
>>> is there a CLI command (or commands) which can update
>>> the kernel, similar to apt-get ?
>>
>> I'm not sure wha
Stephen Powell put forth on 2/14/2010 8:50 PM:
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:53:11 -0500 (EST), Jim Pazarena wrote:
>>
>> is there a CLI command (or commands) which can update
>> the kernel, similar to apt-get ?
>
> I'm not sure what you're asking. The kernel is just another package, as far
> as the p
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:53:11 -0500 (EST), Jim Pazarena wrote:
>
> is there a CLI command (or commands) which can update
> the kernel, similar to apt-get ?
I'm not sure what you're asking. The kernel is just another package, as far
as the package management system is concerned. It is updated the
Thanks for all the replies. I'll look at this next time.
Unfortunately I can't mess with this server now - it's a production box...
--kj
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I just updated an Etch server to linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7 (from -5-) and
> after a reboot network won't come up. The network card is an Intel
> 100mbit, uses the e100 driver. The driver loads, but trying to bring
> eth0 up gives me a "does not exist" error.
>
[...]
> Any ideas appreciated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/22/08 07:50, kj wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I just updated an Etch server to linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7 (from -5-) and
> after a reboot network won't come up. The network card is an Intel
> 100mbit, uses the e100 driver. The driver loads, but trying to
Hi kj,
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 01:50:04PM +0100, kj wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I just updated an Etch server to linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7 (from -5-) and
> after a reboot network won't come up. The network card is an Intel
> 100mbit, uses the e100 driver. The driver loads, but trying to bring
> eth
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 04:33:01 +0800
"Jon Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Is your search string 'kernel-image'? I get a lot more entries. You should
> >check your sources.list
>
> >Andrei
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1:43:34 am 3/02/2006 >>>
> Yes I get a lot more, I only gave a sample, what
>Is your search string 'kernel-image'? I get a lot more entries. You should
>check your sources.list
>Andrei
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1:43:34 am 3/02/2006 >>>
Yes I get a lot more, I only gave a sample, what I was showing is that I do not
get the version on the strings that are returned when I do
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:13:40 +0800
"Jon Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I do a apt-get update and then a apt-cache search kernel-image I only
> get the following for the 2.6 images.
> kernel-image-2.6-386 - Linux kernel image for version 2.6 on 386.
> kernel-image-2.6-686 - Linux kerne
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 06:04:38 +0800
"Jon Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to do a kernel update on our Debian server from 2.4.26 to 2.6.11 or
> better. When I did a apt-cache search kernel-image 2 of the images I got was:
> kernel-image-2.6-686 - Linux kernel image for version 2.6 on
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 06:04:38AM +0800, Jon Miller wrote:
> I need to do a kernel update on our Debian server from 2.4.26 to 2.6.11 or
> better. When I did a apt-cache search kernel-image 2 of the images I got was:
> kernel-image-2.6-686 - Linux kernel image for version 2.6 on
> PPro/Celeron/
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 5:04 pm, Jon Miller wrote:
> I need to do a kernel update on our Debian server from 2.4.26 to 2.6.11 or
> better. When I did a apt-cache search kernel-image 2 of the images I got
> was: kernel-image-2.6-686 - Linux kernel image for version 2.6 on
> PPro/Celeron/PII/PI
On (05/10/04 15:08), Ian L wrote:
> one quick question:
>
> apt-get install kernel-image-x
>
> Thats going to install that specific kernel image alongside the existing
> kernel image, correct? i.e. its not going to replace it.
>
> if so, how do i get lilo to offer me the choice to boot into
nevermind, found out about hitting shift key during boot. still need help
getting 2.6.8 working though :)
Ian
At 03:08 PM 10/5/2004, you wrote:
one quick question:
apt-get install kernel-image-x
Thats going to install that specific kernel image alongside the existing
kernel image, correct? i
one quick question:
apt-get install kernel-image-x
Thats going to install that specific kernel image alongside the existing
kernel image, correct? i.e. its not going to replace it.
if so, how do i get lilo to offer me the choice to boot into both? I
thought the linuxOLD section of my lilo.co
# Boot up Linux by default.
#
default=Linux
initrd=/initrd.img
image=/vmlinuz
label=Linux
read-only
# restricted
# alias=1
This is similiar to what my lilo.conf looked like after i edited it, except:
image=/vmlinuz
label=linux
read-only
initrd=/
At 02:43 PM 10/5/2004, you wrote:
Incoming from Ian L:
> I'm trying to install kernel 2.6.8 and during the apt process it says i
> need to configure lilo to use initrd.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/07/msg00582.html
See down at the bottom.
Thanks ... but i screwed something up. I'm won
On (05/10/04 14:27), Ian L wrote:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Ian L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 14:27:35 -0700
> Subject: kernel update, initrd image help
>
> I'm trying to install kernel 2.6.8 and during the apt process it says i
> need to configure lilo to use initrd.
>
>
Incoming from Ian L:
> I'm trying to install kernel 2.6.8 and during the apt process it says i
> need to configure lilo to use initrd.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/07/msg00582.html
See down at the bottom.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(
Am Mittwoch, 16. Juni 2004 15:03 schrieb Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corsetti
Dutra:
> Em Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:00:11 +0200, J. Preiss escreveu:
> > I wanted to change from kernel 2.2 (Boot-Disks-Download) to kernel 2.4 or
> > better 2.6. Now I've been toold to modify manually my lilo.conf by
> > debco
Em Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:00:11 +0200, J. Preiss escreveu:
> I wanted to change from kernel 2.2 (Boot-Disks-Download) to kernel 2.4 or
> better 2.6. Now I've been toold to modify manually my lilo.conf by debconf.
That shouldnât be so dramatic, which changes are that?
Just remember
Luis Finotti wrote:
Thanks Juan, Clive and Alistair!
I successfully updated my kernel. I took the most
immediate way (with just apt-get and updating
lilo: "apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-386") and
everything seems to working.
(Now the Alsa drivers are another story...) :-)
I noticed that I do
Thanks Juan, Clive and Alistair!
I successfully updated my kernel. I took the most
immediate way (with just apt-get and updating
lilo: "apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-386") and
everything seems to working.
(Now the Alsa drivers are another story...) :-)
I noticed that I do not have a sourc
On (24/05/04 16:41), Juan Nin wrote:
>
> Luis Finotti wrote:
>
> >I thought "apt-get update/upgrade" would upgrade the
> >kernel, but it seems that that's not the case. (I
> >don't have any updates there.)
>
> nope...
>
> the kernel is the "heart" of Linux, so you have to explicitly update it
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:54:34AM -0700 or thereabouts, Luis Finotti wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> It seems that my kernel is a rather old version:
> -
> % uname -a
> Linux debian 2.4.3 #2 Sat Mar 31 11:29:19 CST 2001
> i686 unknown
> -
>
> It seems that the newe
Luis Finotti wrote:
I thought "apt-get update/upgrade" would upgrade the
kernel, but it seems that that's not the case. (I
don't have any updates there.)
nope...
the kernel is the "heart" of Linux, so you have to explicitly update it
since it's the most sensible part of the system
So, how does o
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 11:04:40AM -0400, Danny O'Brien wrote:
>
> Sorry to have to post to ask for help on this basic task, but I can't
> find a step-by-step kernel replacement procedure anywhere on the Debian
> site. I've digested the Dwarf's Guide also, without revelation. Maybe
> I'm not hu
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 17:04, Danny O'Brien wrote:
> Sorry to have to post to ask for help on this basic task, but I can't
> find a step-by-step kernel replacement procedure anywhere on the Debian
> site. I've digested the Dwarf's Guide also, without revelation. Maybe
> I'm not hunting properly?
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:42:44 -0500, David Z Maze wrote:
> Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 03:56:13 +0100, knoppix wrote:
>>
>> Kernels work differently than other debian packages. Each kernel revision
>> is a *different* package. So, do:
>>
>> apt-get update
>>
Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 03:56:13 +0100, knoppix wrote:
>
> Kernels work differently than other debian packages. Each kernel revision
> is a *different* package. So, do:
>
> apt-get update
> apt-cache search kernel-image
> apt-get install kernel-image-whateve
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 06:53:42AM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> That will install a new kernel. I don't know your setup, but if you are
> using the standard setup, then IIRC the post install script will ask you
> questions and link your new kernel to /vmlinuz and your old (current) one
> to /vmlinu
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 03:56:13 +0100, knoppix wrote:
> Hi
>
> is apt-get update kernel-2.6 enough to upgrade the kernel ?
>
Kernels work differently than other debian packages. Each kernel revision
is a *different* package. So, do:
apt-get update
apt-cache search kernel-image
apt-get install k
> is apt-get update kernel-2.6 enough to upgrade the kernel ?
No.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:58:17 -0500 Lindsey Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
> 007c
That isn't a ps bug, it's a kernel bug.
Please pass it through ksymoops and send a full bug report to
the kernel lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Op vr 10-01-2003, om 23:03 schreef Gregory Seidman:
> Benedict Verheyen sez:
> } i compiled my own 2.4.20 kernel and it works great.
> } Then sometime later i compiled the nvidia module via
> } the 2 nvidia packages in the distribution.
> } When i upgrade the kernel soemtime in the future and thus
Benedict Verheyen sez:
} i compiled my own 2.4.20 kernel and it works great.
} Then sometime later i compiled the nvidia module via
} the 2 nvidia packages in the distribution.
} When i upgrade the kernel soemtime in the future and thus compile my own
} kernel again, will i have to recompile the n
Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i compiled my own 2.4.20 kernel and it works great.
> Then sometime later i compiled the nvidia module via
> the 2 nvidia packages in the distribution.
> When i upgrade the kernel soemtime in the future and thus compile my own
> kernel again, will i
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, dude wrote:
>
> Would you know where i can read about updating my kernel to 2.4
/usr/src/$YOUR_KERNEL_SOURCE/Documentation/Changes, Current Minimal
Requirements section.
[]s,
Mario O.de Menezes"Many are the plans in a man's heart, but
IPEN-CNEN/SP
>>"Dale" == Dale Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dale> Thanks for the reply, I downloaded the 2.2.17 kernel from
Dale> kernel.org and compiled it, that's actually easier for me than
Dale> the debian way for now.
Incidentally, you can use make-kpkg on kernels downloaded from
kernel.
Thanks for the reply, I downloaded the 2.2.17 kernel from kernel.org and
compiled it, that's actually easier for me than the debian way for now.
dale
Shaul Karl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I just did an apt-get update, apt-get upgrade and apt downloaded the
> > kernel2.2.17 sources. I've been
> I just did an apt-get update, apt-get upgrade and apt downloaded the
> kernel2.2.17 sources. I've been running 2.2.16 because I had some
> trouble with the 2.2.17 kpkg that I set up.
>
What kind of troubles?
> Question is, did apt configure 2.2.17 kernel to be the one that executes when
> I
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 04:09:36PM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
> I just did an apt-get update, apt-get upgrade and apt downloaded the
> kernel2.2.17 sources. I've been running 2.2.16 because I had some
> trouble with the 2.2.17 kpkg that I set up.
>
> Question is, did apt configure 2.2.17 kernel to
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 04:09:36PM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
> I just did an apt-get update, apt-get upgrade and apt downloaded the
> kernel2.2.17 sources. I've been running 2.2.16 because I had some
> trouble with the 2.2.17 kpkg that I set up.
>
> Question is, did apt configure 2.2.17 kernel to
Dale Morris wrote:
>
> I just did an apt-get update, apt-get upgrade and apt downloaded the
> kernel2.2.17 sources. I've been running 2.2.16 because I had some
> trouble with the 2.2.17 kpkg that I set up.
>
> Question is, did apt configure 2.2.17 kernel to be the one that executes when
> I rebo
59 matches
Mail list logo
