On Mi, 22 iun 11, 08:25:00, wolf python london wrote:
>
> I remember I tried to open a ppt with gnumeric carelessly ,'casue
> the bad mouse ! So the system
> remembers it ,and sets gnumeric a highest "priority"(wrong application) .
> Is it really necessary to file a bug , Andrei?
Well, in this
On 22 June 2011 02:19, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 21 iun 11, 19:56:24, wolf python london wrote:
>
> [snip .ppt opened with gnumeric]
>
> This is not a question of priority, but of wrong application. Please
> file a bug against gnumeric, if one doesn't already exist.
>
I remember I tried to o
On Ma, 21 iun 11, 19:56:24, wolf python london wrote:
[snip .ppt opened with gnumeric]
This is not a question of priority, but of wrong application. Please
file a bug against gnumeric, if one doesn't already exist.
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:25:24 +0800, wolf python london wrote:
> On 21 June 2011 21:09, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:56:24 +0800, wolf python london wrote:
>>
>>> That sounds ridiculous at fist glance ,right?
>>
>> Nope, if you are using GNOME. It sounds normal to give GNOME
>> applic
On 21 June 2011 21:09, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:56:24 +0800, wolf python london wrote:
>
>> That sounds ridiculous at fist glance ,right?
>
> Nope, if you are using GNOME. It sounds normal to give GNOME applications
> a higher priority than others, like html files that open with Ep
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:56:24 +0800, wolf python london wrote:
> That sounds ridiculous at fist glance ,right?
Nope, if you are using GNOME. It sounds normal to give GNOME applications
a higher priority than others, like html files that open with Epiphany
instead Iceweasel :-)
> But it happens
Eric P wrote:
> James Vahn wrote:
>> Try "wajig install/unstable gnumeric" and see if that works.
>>
> Thanks for the tip.
And thank you for the heads up- gnumeric is working for me again. :-)
> However, can you clue me into wajig?
> It just reinstalled 1.5.1-1 when I the wajig line up there.
Eric P wrote:
> James Vahn wrote:
>
>>Eric P wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'm running testing, recently upgraded all packages to be upgraded
>>>(Gnome 2.10 and Xorg were the biggies), and Gnumeric no longer starts
>>>anymore.
>>>
>>>Here's what I get:
>>>$ gnumeric
>>>gnumeric: symbol lookup error: gnumeric: u
James Vahn wrote:
> Eric P wrote:
>
>>I'm running testing, recently upgraded all packages to be upgraded
>>(Gnome 2.10 and Xorg were the biggies), and Gnumeric no longer starts
>>anymore.
>>
>>Here's what I get:
>>$ gnumeric
>>gnumeric: symbol lookup error: gnumeric: undefined symbol: cell_formats
Eric P wrote:
> I'm running testing, recently upgraded all packages to be upgraded
> (Gnome 2.10 and Xorg were the biggies), and Gnumeric no longer starts
> anymore.
>
> Here's what I get:
> $ gnumeric
> gnumeric: symbol lookup error: gnumeric: undefined symbol: cell_formats
>
> Anyone else have
Richard Lyons wrote:
> On Monday 06 September 2004 21:43, Paul Gear wrote:
> [...]
>
>>I have another criteria which you may or may not find relevant: is it
>>cross-platform. This is a critical issue to me, because i need to be
>>able to recommend the tool to the end users i support, and most of
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 00:59:48 +0100, Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 06 September 2004 21:43, Paul Gear wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > I have another criteria which you may or may not find relevant: is it
> > cross-platform. This is a critical issue to me, because i need to be
> > able
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 17:33:10 -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> He meant will gnumeric run on windows
Windows builds are possible now, but a lot still needs to be done; see e.g.
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnumeric-list/2004-September/msg00011.html
> or mac...
http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/pack
I don't think gnumeric is cross-platform (easily cross platformed, maybe with cygwin)
whereas Openoffice is (click and install). I use Excel everyday and in combination
with VBA and other programs like SPSS and powerpoint.
I have to admit that I haven't played much with OO macros and not at all
On Monday 06 September 2004 16:50, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> Hi all
>My intention is not to start a flamewar but to get opinions on
> which spreadsheet software is better? While having choice is better, I
> would prefer to start with one and stick to it if possible. In
> particular I am
On Monday 06 September 2004 07:41 am, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> Hi all
>My intention is not to start a flamewar but to get opinions on
> which spreadsheet software is better? While having choice is better,
> I would prefer to start with one and stick to it if possible. In
> particular I
Richard Lyons wrote:
On Monday 06 September 2004 21:43, Paul Gear wrote:
[...]
I have another criteria which you may or may not find relevant: is it
cross-platform. This is a critical issue to me, because i need to be
able to recommend the tool to the end users i support, and most of them
still
On Monday 06 September 2004 21:43, Paul Gear wrote:
[...]
>
> I have another criteria which you may or may not find relevant: is it
> cross-platform. This is a critical issue to me, because i need to be
> able to recommend the tool to the end users i support, and most of them
> still use Windows
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 22:28:04 +0200 J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
[...]
> sendmail.cf does not resemble line noise. It resembles the result of
> somebody banging his head on the keyboard. Anybody who has worked with it
> will understand why.
> Seth Breidbart in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That's cool
Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> Hi all
>My intention is not to start a flamewar but to get opinions on
> which spreadsheet software is better? While having choice is better, I
> would prefer to start with one and stick to it if possible. In
> particular I am looking for
>
> 1) things which ca
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 15:41:16 +, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
>My intention is not to start a flamewar but to get opinions on
> which spreadsheet software is better?
As the maintainer of the Debian packages for gnumeric, I'm not the most
objective source of information. Still, you may
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 03:41:16PM +, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> Hi all
>My intention is not to start a flamewar but to get opinions on
> which spreadsheet software is better? While having choice is better, I
> would prefer to start with one and stick to it if possible. In
> particula
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:00:08 +0200, Marvin Gerardo Aguero Salazar wrote:
> I just installed (via apt-get install) gnumeric, but it crashes when I
> run it.
>
> It displays the following error:
>
>"Fatal error: Cannot allocate memory"
It runs in sid, I've had to uprgrade for just this reason.
> Keith O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Fatal error: Cannot allocate memory
Try running it under gdb.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 29 Jun 2004 12:27:48 +0100
Keith O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is gnumeric in testing sick? I reinstalled a machine last
> weekend and gnumeric is not loading, just generating the error
> message
>
> Fatal error: Cannot allocate memory
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:27:48 +0100, Keith O'Connell wrote:
> So, is it sick in testing, and the solution is on it's way, or
> do I have a local problem all of my own?
Time to teach some fishing, I guess.
Basically what you're asking seems to be "am I experiencing a known bug?",
the counter-qu
> "J" == J H M Dassen (Ray) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Anyone have any suggestions ?
> If you can do without printing via CUPS,
> "rm /usr/lib/libgnomeprint/2.4.2/modules/libgnomeprintcups.so",
> else
> - wait for the cupsys transition to happen in sarge (see
> http://bjorn.haxx.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 07:16:48 +0200, Tim Timmerman wrote:
> I did my usual apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade last saturday,
> and discovered that gnumeric wouldn't run anymore. The only message
> printed is:
>
> Cannot allocate memory.
Most likely the gnumeric process is being loa
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:16:48 +0200
Tim Timmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I did my usual apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade last saturday,
> and discovered that gnumeric wouldn't run anymore. The only message
> printed is:
>
> Cannot allocate memory.
>
> This is mildl
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 15:41:12 -0700, Lars Jensen wrote:
> I have debian packages gnumeric and libguppi16 installed on my machine,
> and I still don't get ant graphs. Nothing happens when I click the graph
> icon, or go to "Insert graph".
What do you get when you do
oaf-run-query "repo_i
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 01:18:16AM +1300, Adam Warner wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 23:14, Johann Spies wrote:
>
> > Is there perhaps an older version availaible which can still print?
> > Where would I get that?
>
> I filed a bug report detailing a work around:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 23:14, Johann Spies wrote:
> Is there perhaps an older version availaible which can still print?
> Where would I get that?
I filed a bug report detailing a work around:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no\&bug=129417
Hope that helps. If the older package
> "Craig" == Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Craig> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 282 ?S 0:00 /usr/X11R6/bin/xfstt --port 7100 --daemon --user
nobody
>>
>> Does xfstt, see above count ?
Craig> It ought to.
Craig> Try this. As root, run "netstat -anp --tcp"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 282 ?S 0:00 /usr/X11R6/bin/xfstt --port 7100 --daemon --user
> nobody
>
> Does xfstt, see above count ?
It ought to.
Try this. As root, run "netstat -anp --tcp" and verify that something is
actually listening on port 7100, and that that something has t
> "Craig" == Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Craig> It's presumably looking for an X font server, which I guess
Craig> you don't have. If you are running XFree86 4.x, you don't
Craig> need one unless you plan to have other machines getting fonts
Craig> from this one.
282 ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have the following fontpath set-up :
>
> Section "Files"
> # breaks rxvt & gnumeric !?
> # FontPath "unix/:7100"
> FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc:unscaled"
> FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
> FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fon
Sorry, sorry, sorry.
Two minutes after sending this e-mail I searched under gnumeric and
fonts, and I got the solution.
Sorry - I'll try to be a bit more patient!
Harvey
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 08:44:38PM +0100, kellyh wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I know this is an old topic, but can anyone
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 12:05:47PM +, Johann Spies wrote:
> I am running woody and calling the "help" function ends in a complaint
> that lynx could not find /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/index.html.
>
> I have search for this file in Contents.gz, but could not find it.
>
> Is this a bug?
Thanks to Ray Dassen's suggestions, I got the Gnumeric deb to build.
Maybe there are general lessons here that others can use. I would say an
important thing for a newcomer is to learn to use nice the facilities that
are available:
Trouble installing a package? Check Debian bug report lo
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:07:54 -0400, Mark Copper wrote:
> I am running dpkg-buildpackage on "unstable" Gnumeric sources. Make
> exits with error saying that it cannot find /usr/lib/libgdk_imlib.la.
Check the debian/control file. It states the build dependencies, including
libgnome-dev which in
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:07:54PM -0400, Mark Copper wrote:
> I am running dpkg-buildpackage on "unstable" Gnumeric sources. Make
> exits with error saying that it cannot find /usr/lib/libgdk_imlib.la.
> Looking in my /usr/lib directory shows that both the corresonding static
> and shared librarie
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 14:09:57 -0400, Mark Copper wrote:
> I want to gnumeric installed on top of debian potato. (Don't need anything
> else from gnome right now). Trouble is that the stable version is too far
> out of date,
True.
> and the testing version won't install (needed libgal4 package
> The solution:
>
> apt-get install gsfonts
Oh, followed by a dpkg-reconfigure libgnomeprint-data, or the
"perl /usr/share/doc/libgnomeprint-data/run-*" thingy. (What an odd
place to put an installation script, eh?)
> I think gnumeric should at least recommend this package, ?
This isn't really
> > > This I can confirm by running gnome-font-install -d :
> >
> > > What is gnome-font-install missing? Any ideas?
> >
> > Does running /usr/share/doc/libgnomeprint-data/run-gnome-font-install help?
>
> Ack, anyone got a fix for this Gnumeric problem?
The solution:
apt-get install gsfonts
I
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 10:31:10PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> perl /usr/share/doc/libgnomeprint-data/run-gnome-font-install \
> /usr/bin/gnome-font-install /usr/share /usr/share
>
> (see the postinst of libgnomeprint-data)
Thanks, but it didn't work...
Rather verbose output:
atla
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 19:09:23 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> Usage: run-gnome-font-install installer datadir srcdir
>
> What does it want as parameters?
perl /usr/share/doc/libgnomeprint-data/run-gnome-font-install \
/usr/bin/gnome-font-install /usr/share /usr/share
(see the posti
Lo, on Sunday, August 12, Hugo van der Merwe did write:
> > > Does running /usr/share/doc/libgnomeprint-data/run-gnome-font-install
> > > help?
>
> > No it doesn't, because the above file doesn't exist! ;^)
>
> I believe it does. At least on my system. Needs to be executed with perl.
It seems t
> > Does running /usr/share/doc/libgnomeprint-data/run-gnome-font-install help?
> No it doesn't, because the above file doesn't exist! ;^)
I believe it does. At least on my system. Needs to be executed with
perl.
> Ack, anyone got a fix for this Gnumeric problem?
I see there are a number of bug
On 12 Aug 2001 18:43:34 +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 18:37:38 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> > This I can confirm by running gnome-font-install -d :
>
> > What is gnome-font-install missing? Any ideas?
>
> Does running /usr/share/doc/libgnomeprint-data/run-gnom
> Does running /usr/share/doc/libgnomeprint-data/run-gnome-font-install help?
Usage: run-gnome-font-install installer datadir srcdir
What does it want as parameters?
Hugo
--
To send me private (non-world-readable) mail, GPG encrypt it.
1024D/60715698: 5F2E 8EC2 E0A4 5D25 0569 F281 4A6C D76D 60
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 18:37:38 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> This I can confirm by running gnome-font-install -d :
> What is gnome-font-install missing? Any ideas?
Does running /usr/share/doc/libgnomeprint-data/run-gnome-font-install help?
Ray
--
POPULATION EXPLOSION Unique in human exp
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 06:24:27PM +0930, David Purton wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, joe golden wrote:
> > I am running the testing branch (kernel 2.2.19). I just ran a dselect
> > update.
> >
> > dselect is telling me gnumeric depends on libgal4 which "does not appear to
> > be available."
> >
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, joe golden wrote:
> I am running the testing branch (kernel 2.2.19). I just ran a dselect
> update.
>
> dselect is telling me gnumeric depends on libgal4 which "does not appear to
> be available."
>
> Is there no running gnumeric in the testing branch and if so any
> reco
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 17:51:05 +, joe golden wrote:
> Is there no running gnumeric in the testing branch
Apparently. There is a working gnumeric in the unstable branch, which will
propagate to testing at some point. If you need gnumeric now, get the source
from the unstable branch and build
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I upgraded to woody this week and was quite shocked that gnumeric no
> longer provides an export to a .tex file.
>
...
> Anyway, does anybody know if I only lack a package (there are no
> 'suggest' on gnumeric though) or is there another way to get
> (L
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I upgraded to woody this week and was quite shocked that gnumeric no
> longer provides an export to a .tex file.
The version in sid seems to offer LaTeX and LaTeX 2e export.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
The devil finds
Hallo Danie,
>
> No, it's not a bug. Install gnome-help-data. From the description:
Already installed:
$ dpkg -L gnome-help-data | grep
/usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/index.html
produced nothing and so dpkg -L gnome-help-data | grep gnumeric
Groete
Johann
--
Johann Spies
Informasietegnolog
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 12:05:47PM +, Johann Spies wrote:
> I am running woody and calling the "help" function ends in a complaint
> that lynx could not find /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/index.html.
>
> I have search for this file in Contents.gz, but could not find it.
>
> Is this a bug?
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 23:26:54 -0700, David Nusinow wrote:
> The gnumeric package has a dependency on the libgal6 package, but that's
> been removed from sources (I think) and replaced with a new libgal7
> package. This broke the gnumeric package, and some other packages like
> gabber.
> I don't
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 11:13 pm, Renai LeMay wrote:
> can someone give me pointers as to why gnumeric is not apt-gettable in
> unstable? or a way to apt-get it?
I assume you mean the libgal6 problem. It's bug #99041 if you're curious. The
gnumeric package has a dependency on the libgal6 packag
Jim McCloskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would be very useful, though, to have a more up-to-date version
> of gnumeric than the one available in stable (stable has 0.47;
> testing has 0.64).
Ximian (http://www.ximian.com/) is packaging GNOME for several
GNU/Linux distributions, including De
Jim McCloskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a stable (2.2r3) system and this is the wrong time for me to
>think of upgrading to testing. It would be very useful, though, to
>have a more up-to-date version of gnumeric than the one available in
>stable (stable has 0.47; testing has 0.64).
>
>I d
> > This leads to another question: If a "--disable-something"
> > option is given to the ./configure script, is the Makefile
> > dynamic in that it won't check for the file(s) that would
> > normally take care of what's been disabled ?? Does that
> > make sense ?? ;-)
>
> Aah not sure what you mea
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 11:55:46AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> Yeah, I picked a good example, didn't I ?? In fact, gnumeric may not
> have any sound capabilities at all. Maybe it does... Where esound
> comes in is that *another* package that gnumeric requires requires
> esound itself. Aren't de
> > Compiling from source may not be any better. For example,
> > in addition to needing "esound-common" installed, you may
> > also need
>
> hmm why do I need sound at all.. its a spreadsheet.. that was
> one of the strangest deps I was hoping could be disabled in
> the source. I never have deskto
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:47:44AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
>
> application, I was concerned that I'd need to install various qt
> libs and possibly even some KDE, depending on how things were
> packaged. Luckily, it only req'd (not including what I already had
> installed) libqt2.
Mmm I use
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 07:33:38AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > I wanted to install gnumeric but the dep list is huge here (see
> below)
> > is there a way to shrink it.. is there any scope for this building
> > from source?
>
> Do you not run many gnome packages ?? Many of those are pretty
>
> I have another experience. After I have installed Debian, my
package
> management program becomes a mess, and I install new packages with
> dpkg after downloading from the Debian site. Although
> I do not run gnome, I installed gnumeric this way (in Potato), and
had
> to install only a few extra
"Hall Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Do you not run many gnome packages ?? Many of those are
> > > pretty "standard" packages that you would need installed
> > > anyway for other gnome programs.
> [..]
> , if you want to run *one* gnome app, you have to accept the dependencies
> that
> > Do you not run many gnome packages ?? Many of those are
> > pretty "standard" packages that you would need installed
> > anyway for other gnome programs.
>
> Don't act so incredulous. Many people think Gnome is entirely
> the wrong direction for Unix to go in, or it's just too damn big.
My poi
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 11:15:13AM +0100, Gordon Hart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to install gnumeric but the dep list is huge here (see below)
> is there a way to shrink it.. is there any scope for this building
> from source?
>
> Any (mebbe console based) alternatives?
No, the gnome apps of
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 07:33:38AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
>
> Do you not run many gnome packages ?? Many of those are pretty
> "standard" packages that you would need installed anyway for other
> gnome programs.
Don't act so incredulous. Many people think Gnome is entirely the wrong
dir
> I wanted to install gnumeric but the dep list is huge here (see
below)
> is there a way to shrink it.. is there any scope for this building
> from source?
Do you not run many gnome packages ?? Many of those are pretty
"standard" packages that you would need installed anyway for other
gnome progr
on Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 10:47:57PM +0100, Preben Randhol ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote on 30/12/2000 (22:27) :
> > Which libgnomeprint package(s) do you have installed? I've got the
> > following on my system:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:karsten]$ dpkg --get-selection
on Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 10:47:57PM +0100, Preben Randhol ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote on 30/12/2000 (22:27) :
> > Which libgnomeprint package(s) do you have installed? I've got the
> > following on my system:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:karsten]$ dpkg --get-selection
kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote on 30/12/2000 (22:27) :
> Which libgnomeprint package(s) do you have installed? I've got the
> following on my system:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:karsten]$ dpkg --get-selections | grep gnomeprint
> libgnomeprint-bin install
> libgnom
on Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 06:13:26PM +0100, Preben Randhol ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28/12/2000 (01:18) :
> > When I try to start gnumeric I it stops and says that it cannot find the
> > fonts. Programs like gnome-terminal have no problem, but I don't h
Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28/12/2000 (01:18) :
> When I try to start gnumeric I it stops and says that it cannot find the
> fonts. Programs like gnome-terminal have no problem, but I don't have a
> fontmap file in /usr/shar/fonts as gnumeric seems to expect. Does
> anybody know of
In case anyone has had similar problems, I'm responding to my own post
earlier today about gnumeric (in potato/stable) crashing as soon as
it's called.
I upgraded to the version in woody, and the problem has gone,
Jim
I run apt-get install phyton and it says: there are many, which package you
want?
Well, which do I want? Have no idea.
Thanx
Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Antonio Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > When I try to run gnumeric, it says
> > Unable to open module file:/usr/lib/gnumeric/plugins/lib
Antonio Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I try to run gnumeric, it says
> Unable to open module file:/usr/lib/gnumeric/plugins/libpython.s0:
> undefined symbol:_Py_NoneStruct
> Whats wrong?
Did you install phyton?
--
- sig lost -
81 matches
Mail list logo
