On Mon, 10 May 2021 Emanuel Berg wrote:
...and this somewhat more complex-looking one...
"W3C RSS 1.0 News Feed Creation How-To"
https://www.w3.org/2001/10/glance/doc/howto
Great, but stops on and ,
Elsewhere in the thread you seem to have moved on from XSLT to more
promising options, but
On 2021-05-12, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> Going directly to https://interglacial.com/tpj/26/ gives 403.
>
> Going directly to https://interglacial.com/ works.
>
>>From there, clicking https://interglacial.com/tpj/ gives 403.
>
> So, it's *probably* not a referer check. It could be a permissions
> s
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Going directly to https://interglacial.com/tpj/26/
> gives 403.
Now it is 403 but the other day I got 404 so it seems the
webmaster is working on the situation...
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
David Wright wrote:
> Here you go
Thanks!
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
> >>> Having read through the rather old
> >>> https://interglacial.com/tpj/26/ it looked to me as though the OP
> >>> is halfway there.
> >> The Perl Journal? What do you mean? (URL gives a 404)
> I checked again just now, and I still get errors from that URL and its
> parent directory, but they
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 03:03:33PM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
let's see, first write HTML, then include it in Markdown,
then have the static site generator generate HTML
Surely there must be some site generator with RSS support
that takes "plain" HTML as input.
I don't
On 2021-05-11 at 23:01, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 12 May 2021 at 03:15:38 (+0200), Emanuel Berg wrote:
>
>> David Wright wrote:
>>
>>> BTW I downloaded one of the pages [...] just out of interest, the
>>> code looked laid out very clearly — quite unlike so many web
>>> pages I see.
>>
>> Wel
David Wright wrote:
> BTW I downloaded one of the pages [...] just out of
> interest, the code looked laid out very clearly — quite
> unlike so many web pages I see.
Well, thank you, pretty simple HTML I'd imagine but I guess
one can screw up even simple tasks...
> Having read through the rather
On Wed 12 May 2021 at 03:15:38 (+0200), Emanuel Berg wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
>
> > BTW I downloaded one of the pages [...] just out of
> > interest, the code looked laid out very clearly — quite
> > unlike so many web pages I see.
>
> Well, thank you, pretty simple HTML I'd imagine but I gue
On Tue 11 May 2021 at 09:08:16 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 10 mai 21, 19:23:02, David Wright wrote:
> > On Tue 11 May 2021 at 00:30:24 (+0200), Emanuel Berg wrote:
> > >
> > > OK so no XSLT, no yacc for me, I got another idea, can you use
> > > the static generators, get the RSS, then
On 10/05/2021 19:30, Emanuel Berg wrote:
OK so no XSLT, no yacc for me, I got another idea, can you use
the static generators, get the RSS, then discard everything
else and use the RSS on the regular or real site?
The links in the RSS will be pointing to the articles using the file
names and p
On Lu, 10 mai 21, 19:23:02, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 11 May 2021 at 00:30:24 (+0200), Emanuel Berg wrote:
> >
> > OK so no XSLT, no yacc for me, I got another idea, can you use
> > the static generators, get the RSS, then discard everything
> > else and use the RSS on the regular or real site?
>> I parsed the question as being about whether the resulting
>> rss.xml would be compatible with the input data, rather
>> than with the rest of the output data generated by the
>> static generator.
>>
>> That is: if you write a set of HTML files completely by
>> hand (using no generators at all),
The Wanderer wrote:
> I parsed the question as being about whether the resulting
> rss.xml would be compatible with the input data, rather than
> with the rest of the output data generated by the
> static generator.
>
> That is: if you write a set of HTML files completely by hand
> (using no gener
David Wright wrote:
> AFAICT no trees will be destroyed or animals be harmed when
> you throw away any output that is generated in excess of
> what you want.
Haha :)
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
After having limited success with XSLT after a lot of work,
and after failing doing a grammar that would add two ints,
I don't feel like doing all HTML to RSS :D LOL - have a look
https://dataswamp.org/~incal/rss/parser/add.grm
What's wrong? Looks right to me! That's SML BTW, maybe it's
the ver
On 2021-05-10 at 20:23, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 11 May 2021 at 00:30:24 (+0200), Emanuel Berg wrote:
>
>> After having limited success with XSLT after a lot of work, and
>> after failing doing a grammar that would add two ints, I don't feel
>> like doing all HTML to RSS :D LOL - have a look
On Tue 11 May 2021 at 00:30:24 (+0200), Emanuel Berg wrote:
> After having limited success with XSLT after a lot of work,
> and after failing doing a grammar that would add two ints,
> I don't feel like doing all HTML to RSS :D LOL - have a look
>
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/rss/parser/add.gr
>> ...and this somewhat more complex-looking one...
>>
>> "W3C RSS 1.0 News Feed Creation How-To"
>> https://www.w3.org/2001/10/glance/doc/howto
>
> Great, but stops on and , these are
> HTML5 tags:
>
> http://html5doctor.com/the-figure-figcaption-elements/
>
> so either we must change the XSL
davidson wrote:
> ...and this somewhat more complex-looking one...
>
> "W3C RSS 1.0 News Feed Creation How-To"
> https://www.w3.org/2001/10/glance/doc/howto
Great, but stops on and , these are
HTML5 tags:
http://html5doctor.com/the-figure-figcaption-elements/
so either we must change the X
Dan Ritter wrote:
> The static refers to this: the pile of data is processed
> when you assemble it, not when a viewer asks for it
Well, of course not...
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> let's see, first write HTML, then include it in Markdown,
>> then have the static site generator generate HTML
>
> Surely there must be some site generator with RSS support
> that takes "plain" HTML as input.
I don't know, if so one would like to know what tool they use
t
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Except that an HTML to RSS converter is is basically useless
> by itself.
Well, it is (would be) useful in my setting which thanks
heaven includes other tools and programs :)
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
Darac Marjal wrote:
>
> On 10/05/2021 07:06, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 10 mai 21, 01:44:32, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> >> Charles Curley wrote:
> >>
> >>> Right. However, as I found out asking elsewhere, you can
> >>> include HTML in Markdown.
> >> Hehehe, let's see, first write HTML, then incl
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-05-09 at 15:36, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > That is what a static site generator is.
> >
> > It's a command-line tool that takes a directory full of content
> > files, a set of templates, a CSS file or 3, and spits out a web site
> > ready to be served by your favorite
On 10/05/2021 07:06, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 10 mai 21, 01:44:32, Emanuel Berg wrote:
>> Charles Curley wrote:
>>
>>> Right. However, as I found out asking elsewhere, you can
>>> include HTML in Markdown.
>> Hehehe, let's see, first write HTML, then include it in
>> Markdown, then have the
On Lu, 10 mai 21, 01:44:32, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Charles Curley wrote:
>
> > Right. However, as I found out asking elsewhere, you can
> > include HTML in Markdown.
>
> Hehehe, let's see, first write HTML, then include it in
> Markdown, then have the static site generator generate
> HTML... brill
On Du, 09 mai 21, 20:15:38, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> ... no one did it? :O
> >>>
> >>> In FLOSS this usually means nobody else needed it.
> >>
> >> Impossible in this, basic case. The static generator guys who
> >> also did the RSS as mentioned already needed it, and did i
davidson wrote:
>> How can I generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files?
>>
>> Tho one would think this to be quite a simple tool of
>> parsing the HTML and outputting the RSS XML dialect,
>> I can't find any tool...
>
> XSLT is a language that is sort of made for describing this
> kind of tran
Charles Curley wrote:
> Right. However, as I found out asking elsewhere, you can
> include HTML in Markdown.
Hehehe, let's see, first write HTML, then include it in
Markdown, then have the static site generator generate
HTML... brilliant :)
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~i
The Wanderer wrote:
> One possible difference is that the ones I've looked at
> (admittedly nowhere near all of them) seem to expect the
> input to be in some other format, to be translated into HTML
> etc., rather than letting you write the HTML etc.
> directly and doing [whatever other things] w
On Sun, 09 May 2021 17:38:06 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> One possible difference is that the ones I've looked at (admittedly
> nowhere near all of them) seem to expect the input to be in some other
> format, to be translated into HTML etc., rather than letting you write
> the HTML etc. directly a
Dan Ritter wrote:
... no one did it? :O
>>>
>>> In FLOSS this usually means nobody else needed it.
>>
>> Impossible in this, basic case. The static generator guys who
>> also did the RSS as mentioned already needed it, and did it,
>> only not modular to fit this purpose (IIUC from reading he
On 2021-05-09 at 15:36, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Emanuel Berg wrote:
>>> It sounds like you've written about a quarter of a static site
>>> generator already.
>>
>> Heh, no, what do you mean?
>>
>>> You could continue down that path, or just install Pelican and be
>>> happy in about a day.
>>
>> I
On Sun, 9 May 2021 Emanuel Berg wrote:
How can I generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files?
Tho one would think this to be quite a simple tool of parsing
the HTML and outputting the RSS XML dialect, I can't find any
tool...
XSLT is a language that is sort of made for describing this kind o
> I have a blog, just a bunch of HTML5/CSS files, absolutely
> nothing advanced, and I'd like an RSS file which is
> generated from the HTML files (not the CSS, so even simpler
> actually) so I for example can submit it [to Gwene] and read
> it with Gnus
Speaking of Emacs (Emacs Gnus), in GNU ELPA
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> > It sounds like you've written about a quarter of a static site
> > generator already.
>
> Heh, no, what do you mean?
>
> > You could continue down that path, or just install Pelican
> > and be happy in about a day.
>
> I would if it would do what I want namely get an RS
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> ... no one did it? :O
>
> In FLOSS this usually means nobody else needed it.
Impossible in this, basic case. The static generator guys who
also did the RSS as mentioned already needed it, and did it,
only not modular to fit this purpose (IIUC from reading here).
> Why do
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> >> ... no one did it? :O
> >
> > In FLOSS this usually means nobody else needed it.
>
> Impossible in this, basic case. The static generator guys who
> also did the RSS as mentioned already needed it, and did it,
> only not modular to fit this purp
Dan Ritter wrote:
> hugo, jekyll, lektor, nanoc, staticsite, pelican
... unless they can be told by way of options perhaps to do
just the HTML-to-RSS part?
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
Dan Ritter wrote:
>> I don't know why, but it seems too involved anyway, there
>> isn't a webpile2rss tool like this or something:
>>
>> $ webpile2rss *.html > rss.xml # sweet
>
> There isn't one packaged in Debian, but there are libraries
> packaged which would allow you to build one.
... no
On Du, 09 mai 21, 14:19:44, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> >> I don't know why, but it seems too involved anyway, there
> >> isn't a webpile2rss tool like this or something:
> >>
> >> $ webpile2rss *.html > rss.xml # sweet
> >
> > There isn't one packaged in Debian, but there are l
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> How can I generate a rss.xml from a bunch of HTML files?
>
> Tho one would think this to be quite a simple tool of parsing
> the HTML and outputting the RSS XML dialect, I can't find any
> tool...
>
> tt-rss maybe, but when I install it it tries to setup a MySQL
> database
43 matches
Mail list logo
