On Tuesday 13 November 2001 05:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, does anyone know where I can get XF86 version 4 servers for
> Debian? Thanks.
apt-get install xserver-xfree86
--
Sir Isaac Newton:
"If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants."
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001 15:49:27 +0100
"Marcel Figuerola Estrada" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
you should make a .xinitrc file (in your home directory) with the line:
gnome-session
then execute xinit (and xinit will execute all the commands
in .xinitrc).
horacio
> At last it turned out that deactivati
how can I make gnome start when I run X?
Thank you
Note I run XF86 4.1 on Woody
Best wishes,
Marcel
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian-user"
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:04 AM
Subject: Re: XFree86-4: No screens found
&
Marcel Figuerola Estrada, 2001-Nov-08 01:48 +0100:
> I get a fatal error when trying to start x: no screens found. Another message
> says screen(s) found, but none have a usual configuration.
>
> It's very strange because I specified some screed should be good. I have a
> Geforce MX2 Card. I att
On Aug 28 2001, Aaron Traas wrote:
> Aren't True Type Fonts Antialiasable? If so, the msttcorefonts
> package will (upon installation) log on to MS's web site and
> download all of the free (as in beer) "Microsoft Core Fonts"
> including Arial, Comic Sans, Times New Roman, Tahoma (my personal
> fav
On Aug 28 2001, William Leese wrote:
> Oddly enough, at home I have debian unstable running on a machine
> with an Ati Rage Pro, which ofcourse is Mach64 based, _with_ the
> RENDER extension. Although before XFree86 4.1 there didn't seem to
> be support for it (atleast, i never got it work), but n
On Aug 27 2001, Slaven Peles wrote:
> On Monday 27 August 2001 15:23, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > Is it not possible to implement the RENDER extension with this
> > hardware or isn't there demand for it? I'd surely love to get
> > my notebook working with one of these.
>
> Nowhere at XFr
William Leese wrote:
>
>
> Oddly enough, at home I have debian unstable running on a machine with an
> Ati Rage Pro, which ofcourse is Mach64 based, _with_ the RENDER extension.
> Although before XFree86 4.1 there didn't seem to be support for it (atleast,
> i never got it work), but now RENDER s
On August 28, 2001 02:16 am, William Leese wrote:
> >
> > Nowhere at XFree86 web site is explicitely said that there is
> > no DRI support
> > or render extension for Mach64 based video cards, but
> > apparently they are not
> > supported. It seems that nobody is willing to make a driver
> > for t
On Tuesday 28 August 2001 12:16 am, William Leese wrote:
> Not that I use it though... because when i turn on anitaliasing in KDE only
> the ugliest fonts seem to be available to all X applications. I'd rather
> have everything in a good font (lucida, helvetica) than have to look at an
> ugly one t
> -Original Message-
> From: Slaven Peles
> Sent: dinsdag 28 augustus 2001 6:50
> To: Rogério Brito; debian
> Subject: Re: XFree86 4.x RENDER extension...
>
>
> On Monday 27 August 2001 15:23, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > On Aug 27 2001, Slaven Peles wrote
On Monday 27 August 2001 15:23, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Aug 27 2001, Slaven Peles wrote:
> > Make sure what chipset your video card use. Some of Rage Mobility
> > cards use Mach64 in which case there is no help; there is no render
> > support for these.
>
> Uh, oh!
>
> I guess that m
On Aug 27 2001, Slaven Peles wrote:
> Make sure what chipset your video card use. Some of Rage Mobility
> cards use Mach64 in which case there is no help; there is no render
> support for these.
Uh, oh!
I guess that mine is one of those. Mine is an ATI Rage
Mobility LT, wi
On Sunday 26 August 2001 21:38, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Aug 25 2001, Aaron Traas wrote:
> > I'm running Woody with Xfree86 4, and am wondering what I have to do
> > to get the RENDER extension to work, and thus get KDE to anti-alias
> > fonts. Can someone point me in the right direction?
> >
>
On Aug 25 2001, Aaron Traas wrote:
> I'm running Woody with Xfree86 4, and am wondering what I have to do
> to get the RENDER extension to work, and thus get KDE to anti-alias
> fonts. Can someone point me in the right direction?
>
> BTW: My graphics adapter is an ATI Rage Mobility Pro, and the s
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Richard Black wrote:
> Did you get the correct driver from:
>
> http://www.probo.com/timr/savage40.html
>
> I'm not sure that it is in the main stream of 4.x yet--the above site has
> details
> on that though
>
No, but I've found that the savag_drv.o file is already availabl
Did you get the correct driver from:
http://www.probo.com/timr/savage40.html
I'm not sure that it is in the main stream of 4.x yet--the above site has
details
on that though
cheers
Richard
Paul Tansom wrote:
> I've just pulled XFree86 4 from testing as part of another package update and
> as
> means everything works. To make it your default:
> ln -s /etc/X11/X /usr/bin/X11/XFree86
That should read:
ln -s /usr/bin/X11/XFree86 /etc/X11/X
--Pete
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Paul Tansom wrote:
> I've just pulled XFree86 4 from testing as part of another package update and
> as far as I can work out it no longer includes the svga server. Am I missing
> something? I have a Savage 4 chipset (which quotes a null driver), and all
> was
> working fi
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 08:58:30PM -0500, John Patton wrote:
> I've recently upgraded from potato to testing, including the
> switch to Xfree86 version 4. Everything is great except that
> the default font size for many applications (like netscape
> and ddd) is now rather huge. I use 800 x 600 scre
JACKSON, DEAN posts:
> does anyone know of a good place to start for newbie
> documentation on setting up the 4.x Xserver?
The debian-user mailing list archive at http://www.debian.org/
has a good search interface. Use it and dig...
Please do try http://www.debianplanet.org/debianplanet/ and
Hey,
I would open up the XF86Config-4 file and remove the
line that says unix/:7100.
Also, in the 2.4.x kernels, their is voodoo support
you will need to add (I like to have it built in to
the kernel, but you could compile it as a module).
It's in 'Character Devices'->'Direct Rendering Manager
(
Have you tried 15 bits yet? This setting gives me acceptable performance.
--
Chia-Sheng Chang (Jonathan Chang)
Institute of Communications Engineering
College of Electrical Engineering
National Taiwan University
Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alephtnull> debian running unstable, xfree86 version 4, s3virge chipset.. the
FAQ in
alephtnull> xfree86 docs say that my chipset (s3virge) is fully supported in
xfree86-4 in
alephtnull> color depths of 1,4,5,8,16,24. I am currently running at 8 bit
mode. I want to
alephtnull> run at 16 or 24 bi
Here is a mostly working config file for the sony vaio picturebook. I
say mostly because there is a display artifact I see when I start
wmaker. Mark Volkevitch thinks it is a bug in the acceleration.
--
see shy jo
# XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by Dexter, the
# Debia
Anders Lennartsson wrote:
> I have a Sony C1xD (really neat subnotebook) with a 1024x480 display.
> After upgrading from Xfree86 3.3.6 to 4.0.1 I have had problems with the
> display size
> settings in XF86Config-4.
Me too.
> Even if I only have one Mode (1024x480) specified, the Neomagic chipse
Paul Kallstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --
> --
> I just saw the article on Slashdot about nvidia's beta drivers. Unfortunately,
> they are for XF4. Are there any experimental debs anywhere? I certainly would
> LOVE to have my TNT2 Ultra actually WORK.
look a
"Robert L. Harris" wrote:
>
> Diff between woody and potato? Anything major? Summary?
>
I think they're virtually the same right now. There have been a few
minor upgrades lately to packages in woody that are probably not in
potato, but nothing major. It's very unlikely that there would be an
Diff between woody and potato? Anything major? Summary?
Thus spake Brian J. Stults ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Paul Kallstrom wrote:
> >
> > --
> > --
> > I just saw the article on Slashdot about nvidia's beta drivers.
> > Unfortunately,
> > they are for XF4. A
Paul Kallstrom wrote:
>
> --
> --
> I just saw the article on Slashdot about nvidia's beta drivers. Unfortunately,
> they are for XF4. Are there any experimental debs anywhere? I certainly would
> LOVE to have my TNT2 Ultra actually WORK.
>
I don't know if there a
30 matches
Mail list logo
