On 3/11/06, Mark Fletcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
nullman wrote:> 2 short infos to clarify :>> 1. VNC over http doesn´t existIs that strictly true? Both [EMAIL PROTECTED] and RealVNC Personal Edition offera version that allows access through a web browser on the client side,
specifically to be
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:57:21 -0500
Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> It seems like almost all cool
> tools on Windows need cygwin!
>
> Hal
Have a look at OpenSSH for Windows http://sshwindows.sourceforge.net
It is also based on Cygwin, but doesn't need a full install of the later
On Monday 13 March 2006 11:42, anoop aryal wrote:
...
> > Again thanks a lot for the suggestion, I'll try this too -- but I
> > have a possibly stupid question. What protocol will the gateway of
> > my corporate WAN think it is being asked to handle in this case? I
> > don't think it will allow any
On Saturday 11 March 2006 02:02 am, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Hal Vaughan wrote:
> >On Friday 10 March 2006 09:29, nullman wrote:
> >>2 short infos to clarify :
> >>
> >>1. VNC over http doesn´t exist
> >>2. Port-Numbers can be altered with any version
> >>
> >>Solution would be : ssh on Port 443 ...
On Saturday 11 March 2006 03:02, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Hal Vaughan wrote:
> >On Friday 10 March 2006 09:29, nullman wrote:
> >>2 short infos to clarify :
> >>
> >>1. VNC over http doesn´t exist
> >>2. Port-Numbers can be altered with any version
> >>
> >>Solution would be : ssh on Port 443 ... wit
Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Friday 10 March 2006 09:29, nullman wrote:
2 short infos to clarify :
1. VNC over http doesn´t exist
2. Port-Numbers can be altered with any version
Solution would be : ssh on Port 443 ... with that you can trick most
proxies with the "connect" method to use any proxy
nullman wrote:
2 short infos to clarify :
1. VNC over http doesn´t exist
Is that strictly true? Both [EMAIL PROTECTED] and RealVNC Personal Edition offer
a version that allows access through a web browser on the client side,
specifically to be more firewall-friendly; what are they doing i
i use nxserver (freenx), it's in apt, plus the official client from
www.nomachine.com, available for windows, macintosh and linux (rpm and
deb). all traffic runs over ssh, so sshd must be running, and it's much
faster than any vnc. i didn't keep an eye on this project during the
last months, but i
Interestingly enough, I was just looking into a similar thing yesterday. I
have yet to try it out, but here's the info:
Server:
Use apt-get install vcnserver to get vcnserver
Run vncpassword to setup a password which will be encrypted and saved in
~/.vnc/passwd
Run vncserver
Client:
On a linu
On Friday 10 March 2006 09:29, nullman wrote:
> 2 short infos to clarify :
>
> 1. VNC over http doesn´t exist
> 2. Port-Numbers can be altered with any version
>
> Solution would be : ssh on Port 443 ... with that you can trick most
> proxies with the "connect" method to use any proxy-capable ssh-c
2 short infos to clarify :1. VNC over http doesn´t exist2. Port-Numbers can be altered with any versionSolution
would be : ssh on Port 443 ... with that you can trick most proxies
with the "connect" method to use any proxy-capable ssh-client (putty
for example)
-> after ssh-connection is ok .. you
11 matches
Mail list logo
