On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:32:44 +, T o n g wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:11:26 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> I would recommend reading [ . . . ]
>
> So, the Debian-recommended way is (still) "pm-utils". I saw that
> pm-utils depends on HAL, and thinking that the HAL will soon be the
> thing in
On 2010-09-24 03:32 +0200, T o n g wrote:
> So, the Debian-recommended way is (still) "pm-utils". I saw that pm-utils
> depends on HAL, and thinking that the HAL will soon be the thing in the
> past,
Huh? AFAIK, pm-utils never depended on HAL; it used to recommend it,
but it does not do this a
2 matches
Mail list logo
