On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:32:44 +0000, T o n g wrote: > On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:11:26 +0000, Camaleón wrote: > >> I would recommend reading [ . . . ] > > So, the Debian-recommended way is (still) "pm-utils". I saw that > pm-utils depends on HAL, and thinking that the HAL will soon be the > thing in the past, so I went for the other route: hibernate with kernel > patch, then hibernate with uwusup. They all turned out to be dead ends.
Mmm... you shouldn't care about the backend used by "gnome-power-manager" or "pm-utils", that's up to developers. User (like us) only have to check if "it works", and if doesn't, make some debug, testing and review the logs to find out the culprit. Nowadays "gnome-power-manager" seems to use DBus instad of HAL, though. > What is not working for me? Anything & everything: > > - suspend > - hibernation What happens when you trigger "suspend" or "hibernation"? > - lid close > - power button to turn off computer These are ACPI events. You mean you get no response when you run any of those actions? Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.09.24.07.45...@gmail.com
