Re: Slashdot colours (was Re: Debian Linux vs BSD)

1999-11-02 Thread Daniel Barclay
> From: David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ... > No, I can only guess at what's going on. The first few lines of > the document source are (wrapped arbitrarily): > > Slashdot:News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. > > .. > > Those colours are a recipe for disaster, I'd say. > ... > Is that a r

Re: Slashdot colours (was Re: Debian Linux vs BSD)

1999-11-01 Thread robbie
Hi I always use lynx for slashdot, and it works fine. I don't think I get junk mail because of it, but it's hard to tell. Regards -- Rob Murray

Re: Slashdot colours (was Re: Debian Linux vs BSD)

1999-11-01 Thread David Wright
Quoting Onno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >I frequently see references to Slashdot here, and when I point my > >browser at them, the page is always rendered in grey/dark grey on > >black. Am I doing something wrong? > > The background should be white maybe you changed your prefs??? Gosh, I wish the

Re: Slashdot colours (was Re: Debian Linux vs BSD)

1999-10-30 Thread Onno
>I frequently see references to Slashdot here, and when I point my >browser at them, the page is always rendered in grey/dark grey on >black. Am I doing something wrong? The background should be white maybe you changed your prefs??? >My usual workaround is (because I run netscrape with -insta

Re: Slashdot colours (was Re: Debian Linux vs BSD)

1999-10-29 Thread Tomasz Wegrzanowski
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 03:57:58PM +, David Wright wrote: > I frequently see references to Slashdot here, and when I point my > browser at them, the page is always rendered in grey/dark grey on > black. Am I doing something wrong? > > My usual workaround is (because I run netscrape with -insta