I had the master muted. I was sure I unmuted it before.
Thank you very much for your help.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
Glenn Meehan (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 19:29, Andreas Janssen wrote:
>
>> Kernel 2.6 comes with both ALSA and OSS drivers. It is very likely
>> that discover/hotplug try to load both and because of that the card
>> does not work properly. Make sure the alsa-base
Glenn Meehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> should I tell kde the device is OSS or ALSA?
ALSA, or autodetect.
> I have checked all the volume levels (that I can) in alsamixer.
Did you unmute the channels?
> There is no mention of the sound card in dmesg. Does this mean that
> the card is not b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Glenn Meehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which kernel options should I use? Should I create modules or compile
> into the kernel?
Go with modules for everything that isn't used to boot. You probably
want the emu10k1 module.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATU
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 19:29, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> Hello
> Kernel 2.6 comes with both ALSA and OSS drivers. It is very likely that
> discover/hotplug try to load both and because of that the card does not
> work properly. Make sure the alsa-base and alsa-oss packages are
> installed, and that
Hello
Glenn Meehan (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I'm having problems getting my sound card (SB Live!) working with the
> kernel 2.6.8.1.
>
> It was working fine with 2.4.26.
>
> Which kernel options should I use? Should I create modules or compile
> into the kernel?
Kernel 2.6 comes with bot
On Saturday 03 July 2004 05:35 am, LeVA wrote:
> I'm asking for help, to make the rear speakers working with
> this sb live card.
I have no idea how to control them independently from the front speakers, but
I have all five working.
I run ALSA rather than OSS.
I have an RCA cable plugged into
Please don't top post.
Good point. Participation on too many top post heavy lists has lead to
some bad habits :-)
You can find that module in the latest kernel versions. I use it myself.
Either download a pre-built kernel binary (look for kernel-image packages), or
better yet, build
On 03/12/02 Peter van Oene did speaketh:
> When modprobe tells me i'm missing emu10k1, do I just go to creative and
> download it?
>
>
> almo:~# modprobe emu10k1
> modprobe: Can't locate module emu10k1
Please don't top post.
You can find that module in the latest kernel versions. I
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:06:57PM -0500, Bruce Park wrote:
> Hmm, which kernel are you using? I am using 2.4.18.bf24. It was only
> loaded because I chose to install it when I first installed the
> system.
The boot floppy kernels are missing a bunch of stuff since they're not
intended for normal
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:40:11AM -0500, Peter van Oene wrote:
> When modprobe tells me i'm missing emu10k1, do I just go to creative and
> download it?
>
>
> almo:~# modprobe emu10k1
> modprobe: Can't locate module emu10k1
It's standard in the 2.4 kernels. 'apt-get install
kernel-image-2.4.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 2:40 pm, Peter van Oene wrote:
> When modprobe tells me i'm missing emu10k1, do I just go to creative and
> download it?
>
This is in the standard debian 2.4 kernels - set up one of these thats
appropriate to your CPU
- -
Peter van Oene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SB Live
Date: 03 Dec 2002 09:40:11 -0500
When modprobe tells me i'm missing emu10k1, do I just go to creative and
download it?
almo:~# modprobe emu10k1
modprobe: Can't locate module emu10k1
tx
pete
On Tue
When modprobe tells me i'm missing emu10k1, do I just go to creative and
download it?
almo:~# modprobe emu10k1
modprobe: Can't locate module emu10k1
tx
pete
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 08:34, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 03/12/02 Peter van Oene did speaketh:
>
> > Can anyone point me to a dec
It looks like Michael is absolutely correct about this. I too had a problem
loading it and although I had emu10k1 already loaded, I wasn't added to the
'audio' group. Make sure to do that and restart.
bp
From: "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL
On 03/12/02 Peter van Oene did speaketh:
> Can anyone point me to a decent FAQ or HOWTO describing how to enable
> support for my SB Live? I'm pretty noobed, and can't seem to get it
> going.
It's quite simple, as far as soundcards go. Try the following:
modprobe emu10k1
Check the
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:50:27PM +0200, Matthias Ospelkaus wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have got a problem: I am using woody installed via netinst. After
> configuring X I now would like to make my sound card working! It's an
> soundblaster live value pci. So I created a new file /etc/modutils/sound
>
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:55:42AM -0800, David Wright wrote:
>
> > But anyways, you should make sure that the card is not muted.
>
> Thanks for the tip; I'll try it when I get home. But... what is "muted"? (I
> know what the word means, I just don't know why one would do such a thing to
> a so
I just added a Creative SB Live! 5.1 card to my machine -- my first
sound card -- and am having trouble with it. On the software side,
everything seems to run just perfectly, but it produces no sound.
Right off the top: I can use normal stero speakers even with a
surround-sound card, right? I
> But anyways, you should make sure that the card is not muted.
Thanks for the tip; I'll try it when I get home. But... what is "muted"? (I
know what the word means, I just don't know why one would do such a thing to a
soundcard.)
David Wright went something in the lines of:
> Creative EMU10K1 PCI Audio Driver, version 0.16, 15:45:02 Oct 13 2001
> PCI: Found IRQ 5 for device 00:0a.0
> emu10k1: EMU10K1 rev 8 model 0x8064 found, IO at 0x9000-0x901f, IRQ 5
> ac97_codec: AC97 Audio codec, id: 0x8384:0x7608 (SigmaTel STAC9708)
>
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Ray Percival wrote:
I see that potato has 2.2.17pre6, but woody is just 2.2.17 (the final, I
assume).
Can I just install the woody deb for kernel-source? Anybody know if it's
compatable?
> Or if you don't want to rebuild your kernel go to opensource.creative.com.
>
> ---
On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 04:24:04PM -0700, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Matthias Czapla wrote:
>
> > In Kernel 2.2.17 there is direct Support for SB Live!. Just compile it
> > in.
>
> I keep hearing this and I keep looking and I can't find it in my 2.2.17
> source (from potato debia
Or if you don't want to rebuild your kernel go to opensource.creative.com.
-- Original Message --
From: S.Salman Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 18:45:53 -0500
>> "RM" == Rick Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Matthias Czapla wrote:
> In Kernel 2.2.17 there is direct Support for SB Live!. Just compile it
> in.
I keep hearing this and I keep looking and I can't find it in my 2.2.17
source (from potato debian package).
_Please_ point me to a file!
...RickM...
13sQQS-05t-00
> After managing to get my XFree86 4.0.1 running last night (which
> seemed an achievement) I set upon setting up an SB Live! (Xgamer)... I
> downloaded the drivers from opensource.creative.com and compiled them
> with few warnings. I then did a 'make install' and got the following
>
Sorry,
but isn't the SB-Live already included into the 2.2.17-kernel?
why not compiling a new one then?
greetings,
Michael
>Hello,
>
> After managing to get my XFree86 4.0.1 running last night (which
> seemed an achievement) I set upon setting up an SB Live! (Xgamer)... I
> downloaded the driver
You seem to have the right idea with #1 below. Compiling the modules seems
to be a little tricky for some people, so I'll tell you how I handle it.
Install the alsa-source and other alsa debs. You'll have an
'alsa-driver.tar.gz' file in /usr/src that you'll have to extract yourself
(I believe it'
On Thu, 07 Sep 2000, Michael Soulier wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Jonathan Wheelhouse wrote:
>
> > Some people say to install from unstable the debs for ALSA and then
> > run alsaconf. A couple of questions - I could change my sources to
> > point at unstable but I don't want to upgrade to woody
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Jonathan Wheelhouse wrote:
> Some people say to install from unstable the debs for ALSA and then
> run alsaconf. A couple of questions - I could change my sources to
> point at unstable but I don't want to upgrade to woody so how do I get
> just the debs for ALSA without upgra
I made a fatal mistake...
I added /usr/src/linux/include/linux :((
So I can't compile it.
Thanks for your help.
It sounds very nice ;-)
Bye,
Sven
Jean-Yves BARBIER wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 05:22:18PM +0100, SGaerner wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > There are still problems with the SB Live kernel
On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 05:22:18PM +0100, SGaerner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There are still problems with the SB Live kernel module.
> I have added the following lines...
>
> Makefile:
> -I/usr/src/linux/include to the line
> CFLAGS += -I$(INCLUDEDIR) -I.
> newline--> CFLAGS += -I$(INCLUDEDIR) -I
On Fri, Nov 05, 1999 at 02:29:44AM +0100, Jean-Yves BARBIER wrote:
> Raaahhh, too simple: there are many things to change :((
Sorry, forget it: the PB was comming from the include directories
as many people, I began with 2.0.36, which is always set in /usr/include;
so I just changed, in Makefi
On Fri, Nov 05, 1999 at 01:42:36AM +0100, Jean-Yves BARBIER wrote:
> I finally found what's wrong with sound.h :
> The program refers to /usr/include/.
> instead of: /usr/src/linux/include/..
Raaahhh, too simple: there are many things to change :((
(BTW I work under 2.2.12, and the par
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 11:45:52PM +0100, SGaerner wrote:
> I used th e dpkg -S command but no file was found.
> The other problem is I have installed the libc6-dev.
>
> Do you have now any idea??? ;-)
Hi Sven,
I finally found what's wrong with sound.h :
The program refers to /usr/include/.
I used th e dpkg -S command but no file was found.
The other problem is I have installed the libc6-dev.
Do you have now any idea??? ;-)
Bye,
Sven
Ingo Reimann wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 07:45:06PM +0100, SGaerner wrote:
> > I made a mistake... :(
> > I get the following error...
> >
> >
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 07:45:06PM +0100, SGaerner wrote:
> I made a mistake... :(
> I get the following error...
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sblive $ make
> #cc -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DLINUX -DPCI_8010 -Wall -O2 -I/usr/include -I.
> -c
> audio.c -o audio.o
> In file included from hwaccess.
I made a mistake... :(
I get the following error...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sblive $ make
#cc -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DLINUX -DPCI_8010 -Wall -O2 -I/usr/include -I. -c
audio.c -o audio.o
In file included from hwaccess.h:45,
from audio.c:35:
platform.h:42: linux/sound.h: No su
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 07:06:11PM +0100, SGaerner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Who tried the new sblive module from Create Labs?? I can't compile it, because
> make doesn't find the header file linux/audio.h.
> Can anybody help me??
>
> The source for this modules can be found under: opensource.creative.com
The things that the instructions left out that I had to do was the
following:
After recompiling, type "make modules" in the kernel source dir
loading soundcore with "insmod soundcore"
then finally "insmod emu10k1.o" where that is appropriate emu10k1 file
copied to the correct directory, as per the
On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 04:36:29PM +0200, Andrea Merello wrote:
> Hello,
> I've tried to install the driver (found in sblive.com) as I've read in
> the
> readme file, but it doesn't work.
> please help me !!!
First, you have to recompile a kernel, saying you have a sound card
(*NOT* as a module!),
On 16-Sep-99 Wojciech Zabolotny wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 09:08:39AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Your wrong. I have a SoundBlaster Live! (Value!), and it works fine under
>> kernel 2.2.11. Simply get the module from
>> http://developer.soundblaster.com/linux/. The README with i
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 09:08:39AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Your wrong. I have a SoundBlaster Live! (Value!), and it works fine under
> kernel 2.2.11. Simply get the module from
> http://developer.soundblaster.com/linux/. The README with it says that it
> will
> only work for kernel
you should open the sblive.o in vi do a search for 2.2.10 ( /2.2.10)
and replace it with 2.2.11 (cw 2.2.11 or r 1)
then you dont have to force and you dont get that mess "this isnt what i was
made for " message
now for my question is there a better way to do multiple configs
right now i have
On 15-Sep-99 Rob Browning wrote:
> "Jim Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Is there a driver for the sound blaster live card?
>> I have the sb.o module installed but don't quite get how to get it started,
>> it says i/o icq and dma is required.
>>
>> so I'm not show to do the i/o as it don't
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 06:09:15AM -0500, Jim Ruby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a driver for the sound blaster live card?
Jim, Creative offers a binary-only module for the Live! card -- you can
download it form their webpage. I think it will work with kernel versions
2.0.36 and 2.2.5, but I could be
"Jim Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a driver for the sound blaster live card?
> I have the sb.o module installed but don't quite get how to get it started,
> it says i/o icq and dma is required.
>
> so I'm not show to do the i/o as it don't like i as an argument.
>
> modprobe i=650
Hi!
> I remember someone saying something about a linux driver for SB live
> sound card available.
http://developer.soundblaster.com/linux/
This webpage contains a module for the sb-live soundcard. But in the README it
states that one must use a non-SMP kernel, and that is not very good news f
I have a SoundBlaster Live! value as well. The drivers are compiled for
2.2.5, but I used 'insmod -f sblive.o' to force them to load, and they
loaded fine. Of course there is nothing to adjust Enviromental Audio,
etc, but better than nothing.
Creative is just terrible with drivers. The no sourc
49 matches
Mail list logo
