On Wed 06 Dec 2023 at 23:08:41 (+), Albretch Mueller wrote:
> On 12/2/23, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> > On 12/2/23, Tom Furie wrote:
> >> 'apt depends ' would list the direct dependencies without
> >> recursion.
> > $ apt depends wget 2>&1 | grep " Depends: " | awk '{ print $2}'
>
> that did
On 12/2/23, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> On 12/2/23, Tom Furie wrote:
>> 'apt depends ' would list the direct dependencies without
>> recursion.
> $ apt depends wget 2>&1 | grep " Depends: " | awk '{ print $2}'
that didn't work, dpkg would still demand dependencies, so I decided
to change the str
On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 10:28:14PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 02 Dec 2023 at 13:48:34 (+), Darac Marjal wrote:
> > On 02/12/2023 04:22, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > apt-get has the side effect of installing the packages on the
> > connected system.
>
> Not with the -d option. I think Greg
On Sat 02 Dec 2023 at 13:48:34 (+), Darac Marjal wrote:
> On 02/12/2023 04:22, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 10:01:54PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > > On Fri 01 Dec 2023 at 21:55:42 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > > apt install ./myfile.deb
> > > That requires you
On Sat 02 Dec 2023 at 07:06:37 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 02:52:25AM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> > direct dependencies of packages which haven't been downloaded,
> > install. I need to download those packages.
> > These should be a straightforward way to do th
On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 06:15:17AM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> They are even using "AI" to mess with
> people they target and it doesn't matter if they know well (which they
> have actually told me) that you are not a criminally minded dude, a
> threat to society, ... and they are quite litera
On 02/12/2023 04:22, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 10:01:54PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 01 Dec 2023 at 21:55:42 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
apt install ./myfile.deb
That requires you to be online, aka "exposed mode". The OP only
exposes a live USB to the outside
On 12/2/23, Tom Furie wrote:
> 'apt depends ' would list the direct dependencies without
> recursion.
Thank you, I think I got what I needed (at least for now).
$ apt depends wget
wget
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.28)
Depends: libgnutls30 (>= 3.7.0)
Depends: libidn2-0 (>= 0.6)
Depends: libnettl
On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 02:52:25AM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> direct dependencies of packages which haven't been downloaded,
> install. I need to download those packages.
> These should be a straightforward way to do that or an easy hack.
> lbrtchx
I /think/ this hack might involve iterat
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 10:01:54PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 01 Dec 2023 at 21:55:42 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > apt install ./myfile.deb
>
> That requires you to be online, aka "exposed mode". The OP only
> exposes a live USB to the outside world, not their "real" system.
>
>
On Fri 01 Dec 2023 at 21:55:42 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 02:52:25AM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> > direct dependencies of packages which haven't been downloaded,
> > install. I need to download those packages.
> > These should be a straightforward way to do that
Albretch Mueller writes:
> How can you list just the direct dependencies? and how safe is it
> downloading and installing only those via dpkg?
'apt depends ' would list the direct dependencies without
recursion.
Why do you want to download them individually and install directly with
dpkg when
On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 02:52:25AM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> direct dependencies of packages which haven't been downloaded,
> install. I need to download those packages.
> These should be a straightforward way to do that or an easy hack.
I'm still struggling to figure out what the X is in
direct dependencies of packages which haven't been downloaded,
install. I need to download those packages.
These should be a straightforward way to do that or an easy hack.
lbrtchx
On 12/2/23, Tom Furie wrote:
...
> This is a recursive search, also showing dependencies of dependencies,
> etc.
How can you list just the direct dependencies? and how safe is it
downloading and installing only those via dpkg?
lbrtchx
Albretch Mueller writes:
> https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/wget
>
> shows 8 packages as "depends"
>
> dep: libc6 (>= 2.28)
> dep: libgnutls30 (>= 3.7.0)
> dep: libidn2-0 (>= 0.6)
> dep: libnettle8
> dep: libpcre2-8-0 (>= 10.22)
> dep: libpsl5 (>= 0.16.0)
> dep: libuuid1 (>= 2.16)
> dep: zlib
On 3/15/22 19:20, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
apt-cache stats
Thought it might prove of interest for others, too, with respect to
seeing real numbers about the amazing volume of packages all
interacting together under Debian's hood.
Thanks
I was not aware of this apt-cache option
an
On 3/15/22, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Cousin Stanley wrote:
>> Cousin Stanley wrote :
>> > The data is already on your system, so
>> > there's no transmission happening.
>>
>> I do not understand this.
> ...
>
>> Does the Debian package manager
>> really download package information
>> for al
Cousin Stanley wrote:
> Cousin Stanley wrote :
> > The data is already on your system, so
> > there's no transmission happening.
>
> I do not understand this.
...
> Does the Debian package manager
> really download package information
> for all ~59,000 avaiilabel packages
> in an
On 2022-03-15, Cousin Stanley wrote:
>
>> Whether or not you want to see it
>> is a different issue.
>
> I understand this.
>
>> The data is already on your system, so
>> there's no transmission happening.
>
> I do not understand this.
>
> I was under the impression that
> package info
On Tue, Mar 15 2022 at 08:28:41 AM, Cousin Stanley
wrote:
>
>
>
> I was under the impression that
> package information returned by
>
> apt-cache show some-package
>
> for packages that I have not installed
> would not be downloaded onto my system
> until I actually requested
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 08:28:41AM -0700, Cousin Stanley wrote:
> I was under the impression that
> package information returned by
>
> apt-cache show some-package
>
> for packages that I have not installed
> would not be downloaded onto my system
> until I actually requested
Cousin Stanley wrote :
>> What I don't understand is the necessity
>> to transmit a string of 3933 bytes
>> for 87 golang packages for example
>> when a link to the same would suffice
>> for those that actually require it.
Dan Ritter wrote :
> The package manager needs it.
I understand this.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 06:36:52AM -0700, Cousin Stanley wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > No, it seems you haven't understood.
> >
>
> I assure you that I do understand the need
> for access to the Built-Using list.
>
> What I don't understand is the necessity
> to transmit
Cousin Stanley wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > No, it seems you haven't understood.
> >
>
> I assure you that I do understand the need
> for access to the Built-Using list.
>
> What I don't understand is the necessity
> to transmit a string of 3933 bytes
> for 87 golang
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> No, it seems you haven't understood.
>
I assure you that I do understand the need
for access to the Built-Using list.
What I don't understand is the necessity
to transmit a string of 3933 bytes
for 87 golang packages for example
when a link to the sa
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:23:02PM -0700, Cousin Stanley wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> >
> > Not having Built-Using is just like not having dependencies.
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
> I can understand the need for the Built-Using list
> for the developers that need it.
No, it
Cousin Stanley wrote:
> Reading this newsgroup earlier today
> someone mentioned the hugo package
> for static site generation.
>
> I was curious about the package
> so I tried
>
> $ apt-cache show hugo
...
i have been building hugo on my Debian system for
quite a while
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:37:30PM -0700, Cousin Stanley wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
>
> > How about:
> >
> > $ apt-cache show hugo | grep -v '^Built-Using:'
> >
> > which you could wrap into a function.
> >
>
> I don't mind the Built-Using list at all
> for reasonable sized lists and I
David Wright wrote:
> How about:
>
> $ apt-cache show hugo | grep -v '^Built-Using:'
>
> which you could wrap into a function.
>
I don't mind the Built-Using list at all
for reasonable sized lists and I wouldn't
care to remove it altogether.
I can use your suggestion to remove it
Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> Not having Built-Using is just like not having dependencies.
Thanks for the explanation.
I can understand the need for the Built-Using list
for the developers that need it.
In cases such as that for the l o n g list
returned for golang built packages like
On Mon 14 Mar 2022 at 16:33:42 (-0700), Cousin Stanley wrote:
> Andy Smith wrote:
> >
> > So this information is needed for the developers and packagers,
> > but I suppose you could argue that it is information overload
> > for the casual user of "apt show".
>
> It seems to be information
Andy Smith wrote:
>
> So this information is needed for the developers and packagers,
> but I suppose you could argue that it is information overload
> for the casual user of "apt show".
It seems to be information overload for me pesonally.
Perhaps a link to the relevant golang list
Cousin Stanley wrote:
> Reading this newsgroup earlier today
> someone mentioned the hugo package
> for static site generation.
>
> I was curious about the package
> so I tried
>
> $ apt-cache show hugo
>
> The usual package information was returned
> along with, in my
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:53:21PM -0700, Cousin Stanley wrote:
> $ apt-cache show hugo
>
> The usual package information was returned
> along with, in my opinion, an unsightly mess
> entailing a long string of 88 entries
> naming individual golang packages
> following Buil
L Dimov wrote:
As you and I both install the generic kernel linux-image-amd64, we
would expect to have to use apt-get dist-upgrade whenever there's
a new kernel version (because a version number is included in the
package name, so it's a "new" package).
apt upgrade will install new packages
On Thu 24 Feb 2022 at 18:32:47 (+), L Dimov wrote:
> On Thursday, February 24, 2022, 01:12:48 PM EST, David Wright
> wrote:
> > On Thu 24 Feb 2022 at 17:50:28 (+), L Dimov wrote:
> > > On Thursday, February 24, 2022, 12:39:27 PM EST, Greg Wooledge
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb
On 2022-02-24 19:32 UTC+0100, L Dimov wrote:
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> libabsl20200923 libopengl0 linux-image-5.10.0-11-amd64
These are legitimate Debian packages which are also installed on my
Bullseye system. Apparently, some dependencies have changed.
--
http://www.
On Thu 24 Feb 2022 at 17:50:28 (+), L Dimov wrote:
> On Thursday, February 24, 2022, 12:39:27 PM EST, Greg Wooledge
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 05:32:45PM +, L Dimov wrote:
> > > Is it normal that for a while now, maybe 2 or so weeks, these 17 packages
> > > are continuing to
On 2022-02-24 18:50 UTC+0100, L Dimov wrote:
> I do indeed use apt-get update and apt-get upgrade, and I am aware that
> there are ways I can force them to upgrade, but should I?
At least it will help you to analyze the situation, you still can cancel
the operation.
IMO this is not a normal si
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 05:32:45PM +, L Dimov wrote:
> Is it normal that for a while now, maybe 2 or so weeks, these 17 packages are
> continuing to be kept back? I am on Debian 11 Bullseye stable with only main
> repositories.
>
> The following packages have been kept back:
> gir1.2-javas
On Mon, 17 May 2021 09:36:03 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> So I'd look for any non-bullseye holdover packages, and
> particlarly any that depend directly or indirectly on
> libgc1c2, probably via guile 2.2.
Interesting, thank you. I ran
apt-cache rdepends guile-2.2-libs /bullseye
on orca (fresh
On Mon 17 May 2021 at 07:16:21 (-0600), Charles Curley wrote:
> I upgraded a laptop from Buster to Bullseye recently. I had unattended
> upgrades running, and have kept it running since. I have gotten the
> following in the unattended upgrades report since:
>
> Packages with upgradable origin but
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 01:38:47PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>a thread on debian-user reveils problems with package mirrors for 8.8.0
>jigdo images. It begins at
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2018/02/msg00531.html
>
>I wrote on debian-user:
>> > "File not found" messages from th
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 at 16:38:24 (+), Curt wrote:
> On 2018-01-24, wrote:
> >
> >> > [1] https://packages.debian.org/
> >> > [2]
> >> > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=aptitude&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all
> >>
> >> Hm. I had occasion to go to ¹ yesterday. (In passing, if I re
On 1/24/18, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:05:08AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
>> So forget using this page for anything really vague like kernel-image,
>> even if you set suite, section and then architecture; it can't even
>> show you the most basic generic versions like lin
Good morning.. :) I just noticed Webmaster was CC'd here. I left that
in place because who knows when it comes to various Debian features
evolving their perks over time.. :)
On 1/24/18, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 24 Jan 2018 at 10:53:17 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018
On 2018-01-24, wrote:
>
>> > [1] https://packages.debian.org/
>> > [2]
>> > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=aptitude&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all
>>
>> Hm. I had occasion to go to ¹ yesterday. (In passing, if I remove the
>> word "index", I end up at a different page ² but the r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:05:08AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 24 Jan 2018 at 10:53:17 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:21:45AM +0100, Floris wrote:
> > > Op Tue, 23 Jan 2018 20:44:19 +0100 schreef OECT T :
> >
>
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 07:53:21PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> Using Jessie, as I was unable to discover how to install a pair of
> interdependent .debs
Put them both on your local machine, and install them using a single
dpkg -i command:
[sudo if needed] dpkg -i thing1.deb thing2.deb
Nicolas,
Thanks--I guess things are OK now, but I'm not sure--well, let me tell you
what I found and what I think happened.
I went to uninstall doxygen (just in case there was some part of it hanging
around that I should get rid of before trying to install again). I used apt-
get from a konsol
Le quintidi 25 vendémiaire, an CCXXV, rhkra...@gmail.com a écrit :
> I've had several packages fail to install with a message saying that the post-
> install script failed (returned a 1, iirc). (I'm writing from my Wheezy
> machine.)
> Has anybody been having similar problems? Any hints as to w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-01-08 17:12, Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
> On 2014-01-08 04:44, Diogene Laerce wrote:
>> Hi,
>
[...] I would like to automate the installation process from
scratch to a django development platform. But forgot to
note every modi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-01-08 04:44, Diogene Laerce wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> [...] I would like to automate the installation process from
>>> scratch to a django development platform. But forgot to note
>>> every modification from the very beginning. ^^ :)
>> I'm not su
Hi,
[...] I would like to automate the installation process from
scratch to a django development platform. But forgot to note every
modification from the very beginning. ^^ :)
I'm not sure what you mean by "development platform", but for
standardized/customized development/testing environments,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-01-07 05:08, Diogene Laerce wrote:
> [...] I would like to automate the installation process from
> scratch to a django development platform. But forgot to note every
> modification from the very beginning. ^^ :)
I'm not sure what you mean b
Is there a simple way to get the list of packages installed since the fresh
installation of deby ?
How long ago was your fresh installation? There are backups of the
dpkg package status kept in /var/backups that go back a week. And if
you have a system backup you could retrieve older copies g
Diogene Laerce wrote:
> >>Is there a simple way to get the list of packages installed since the fresh
> >>installation of deby ?
> >How long ago was your fresh installation? There are backups of the
> >dpkg package status kept in /var/backups that go back a week. And if
> >you have a system backu
Is there a simple way to get the list of packages installed since the fresh
installation of deby ?
How long ago was your fresh installation? There are backups of the
dpkg package status kept in /var/backups that go back a week. And if
you have a system backup you could retrieve older copies g
Diogene Laerce wrote:
> Is there a simple way to get the list of packages installed since the fresh
> installation of deby ?
How long ago was your fresh installation? There are backups of the
dpkg package status kept in /var/backups that go back a week. And if
you have a system backup you could
Is there a simple way to get the list of packages installed since
the fresh
installation of deby ?
I saw etckeeper in the doc (it's a bit late for that :( ) and I
know I can
go through the logs : /var/log/dpkg.log, /var/log/apt/term.log,
/var/log/aptitude but Christmas was only 7 days ago, mayb
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 10:12:07 +0700
Diogene Laerce wrote:
>
> >> Is there a simple way to get the list of packages installed since
> >> the fresh
> >> installation of deby ?
> >>
> >> I saw etckeeper in the doc (it's a bit late for that :( ) and I
> >> know I can
> >> go through the logs : /var/l
Is there a simple way to get the list of packages installed since the
fresh
installation of deby ?
I saw etckeeper in the doc (it's a bit late for that :( ) and I know
I can
go through the logs : /var/log/dpkg.log, /var/log/apt/term.log,
/var/log/aptitude but Christmas was only 7 days ago, m
On 12/31/2013 06:58 AM, Diogene Laerce
wrote:
Hi,
Is there a simple way to get the list of packages installed since
the fresh
installation of deby ?
I saw etckeeper in the doc (it's a bit late for that :( ) and I
Hi,
Dňa Mon, 30 Dec 2013 11:20:50 +0100 Sven Joachim
napísal:
> On 2013-12-30 10:58 +0100, Slavko wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > please, it is some time ago, when some packages was removed from
> > testing. I wait some time, because this sometime happens due
> > dependencies, but now it take long tim
On 2013-12-30 10:58 +0100, Slavko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please, it is some time ago, when some packages was removed from
> testing. I wait some time, because this sometime happens due
> dependencies, but now it take long time and i am not able to find the
> reason (qa pages, hint, etc...).
Usually you
Jari Fredrisson writes:
> I can't install or update ANYTHING in my wheezy right now.
First of all, versions for different architectures are equal.
For example:
freehck@lpt00:~% apt-cache policy libcurl3
libcurl3:
Installed: 7.32.0-1
Candidate: 7.32.0-1
Version
On 2013-10-18 17:54 +0200, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
> I can't install or update ANYTHING in my wheezy right now.
>
> Whatever I try, there is always this:
>
> dpkg: error processing libcurl3:amd64 (--configure):
> package libcurl3:amd64 7.26.0-1+wheezy4 cannot be configured because
> libcurl3:i386
On Sunday 02 January 2011 10:29:14 Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:05:38AM +, Lisi wrote:
> > On Monday 15 November 2010 03:54:42 Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Rob Hurle wrote:
> > > > Does anyone have advice on the best way to handle a .deb package?
> > >
> > > The easiest way
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:05:38AM +, Lisi wrote:
> On Monday 15 November 2010 03:54:42 Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Rob Hurle wrote:
> > > Does anyone have advice on the best way to handle a .deb package?
> >
> > The easiest way is to not handle .deb files at all. Instead allow
> > apt-get to instal
On Monday 15 November 2010 03:54:42 Bob Proulx wrote:
> Rob Hurle wrote:
> > Does anyone have advice on the best way to handle a .deb package?
>
> The easiest way is to not handle .deb files at all. Instead allow
> apt-get to install the package and any dependencies from the network.
I use aptitu
Bob Proulx writes:
> Tyler Smith wrote:
>> Doesn't the 'ALL=(ALL) ALL' line give the user unlimited authority
>> anyways?
>
> It isn't about restricting privilege. Both have superuser privilege.
> It is about the invocation environment.
>
I hadn't thought of that. Makes sense.
> Sure if you ar
In <4ce196ad.2070...@googlemail.com>, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
>15/11/2010 21:01, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> In <20101115192606.gb18...@hysteria.proulx.com>, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>> * 'sudo' uses your user password while 'su' uses root's password.
>>>
>>> With sudo you manage your own
see below.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 00:54, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Rob Hurle wrote:
>> Does anyone have advice on the best way to handle a .deb package?
>
> The easiest way is to not handle .deb files at all. Instead allow
> apt-get to install the package and any dependencies from the network.
>
>> C
Sry, didnt reply to list in first place...
- Original message -
> - Original message -
> > I'm quite new to debian and I'm getting my head around dpkg,
> > apt-get, aptitude and synaptic. Does anyone have advice on the best
> > way to handle a .deb package? Can I make up
15/11/2010 21:01, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In <20101115192606.gb18...@hysteria.proulx.com>, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> * 'sudo' uses your user password while 'su' uses root's password.
>> With sudo you manage your own password. With su you manage both
>> your password *and* root's password.
>
In <20101115192606.gb18...@hysteria.proulx.com>, Bob Proulx wrote:
>* 'sudo' uses your user password while 'su' uses root's password.
> With sudo you manage your own password. With su you manage both
> your password *and* root's password.
For those that prefer using root's password, sudo has th
Kelly Clowers writes:>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 23:20, Andrei Popescu wrote:>>> On Du, 14 nov 10, 20:54:42, Bob Proulx wrote: And if 'sudo' isn't configured for you then that is the first thingthat you will want to do. :-) # visudo rob ALL=(ALL) ALL>> What's w
In <87k4ker2gj@guruji.demimonde>, Tyler Smith wrote:
>Kelly Clowers writes:
>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 23:20, Andrei Popescu
>> wrote:
>>> On Du, 14 nov 10, 20:54:42, Bob Proulx wrote:
And if 'sudo' isn't configured for you then that is the first thing
that you will want to do. :-)
Tyler Smith wrote:
> Doesn't the 'ALL=(ALL) ALL' line give the user unlimited authority
> anyways?
It isn't about restricting privilege. Both have superuser privilege.
It is about the invocation environment.
The difference is that:
* 'sudo' uses your user password while 'su' uses root's passwor
Kelly Clowers writes:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 23:20, Andrei Popescu
> wrote:
>> On Du, 14 nov 10, 20:54:42, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>>
>>> And if 'sudo' isn't configured for you then that is the first thing
>>> that you will want to do. :-)
>>>
>>> # visudo
>>> rob ALL=(ALL) ALL
>>
>> What
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 23:20, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Du, 14 nov 10, 20:54:42, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>
>> And if 'sudo' isn't configured for you then that is the first thing
>> that you will want to do. :-)
>>
>> # visudo
>> rob ALL=(ALL) ALL
>
> What's wrong with su?
It is the The Wrong
>> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:22:13 +1100, Rob Hurle wrote:
>> I'm quite new to debian and I'm getting my head around dpkg, apt-get,
>> aptitude and synaptic. Does anyone have advice on the best way to
>> handle a .deb package? Can I make up my own repository of .deb packages
>> and point apt-get at
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:22:13 +1100, Rob Hurle wrote:
> I'm quite new to debian and I'm getting my head around dpkg, apt-get,
> aptitude and synaptic. Does anyone have advice on the best way to
> handle a .deb package? Can I make up my own repository of .deb packages
> and point apt-get at that t
On Du, 14 nov 10, 20:54:42, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> And if 'sudo' isn't configured for you then that is the first thing
> that you will want to do. :-)
>
> # visudo
> rob ALL=(ALL) ALL
What's wrong with su?
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http:/
Rob Hurle wrote:
> Does anyone have advice on the best way to handle a .deb package?
The easiest way is to not handle .deb files at all. Instead allow
apt-get to install the package and any dependencies from the network.
> Can I make up my own repository of .deb packages and point apt-get
> at t
Your primary method of installing programs is going to be apt-get, especially
if your new to linux. Apt is in essence a front end that runs ontop of dpkg and
uses remote repositories to fetch, install, remove, and upgrade programs,
including the dependences of those programs. This is a major ad
On 10/30/2010 11:23 PM, Jason Hsu, embedded engineer, Linux user wrote:
What package do I need to add to a minimal Debian installation so that I can
reboot or shut down from GNOME, XFCE, Fluxbox, IceWM, etc.?
initscripts?
GDM and GNOME, for example, already know how to run shutdown as in:
#
On Mi, 20 oct 10, 19:56:46, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> [Moved back to debian-user]
This time for real...
> On Mi, 20 oct 10, 14:47:17, André Berger wrote:
> > David Kalnischkies (2010-10-20):
> >
> > > mhh, yeah, if debian-users@ can't provide help instantly: ask again
> > > - or just wait a tiny
Sthu Deus wrote:
Good day.
I think after
$ sudo apt-get update
i have got a message on
$ sudo -t stable apt-get upgrade
stating that some packages can not be authenticated.
Before - all was all right: i was updating and upgrading - no problems, but now
I have the problem.
Sometimes t
On Mon,13.Apr.09, 01:17:59, Miguel Obliviemo wrote:
> What is the significance of this message, when installing from a
> downloaded (with Jigdo) Lenny DVD?
Did you add the DVD to sources.list with apt-cdrom (or how did you
install the package)?
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply,
Thilo Six wrote the following on 28.01.2009 06:23
<- *snip* ->
> In the case above all packages are not marked as "auto"
^-non
sorry for the writing error
--
bye Thilo
key: 0x4A411E09
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.
Ron Johnson wrote the following on 28.01.2009 05:42
<- *snip* ->
>>> # apt-get install \
>>> $(cat /media/thumb/package.versions.txt | cut -d/ -f1)
>> Just a lillte heads up.
>> At least since lenny then you might be interessted in:
,[ man 8 apt-mark ]
When you reques
On 01/27/2009 10:02 PM, Thilo Six wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote the following on 27.01.2009 23:05
<- *snip* ->
My machine:
$ apt-show-versions > /media/thumb/package.versions.txt
Their machine, when in a minimal state:
# apt-get install \
$(cat /media/thumb/package.versions.txt | cut -d/ -f1)
Ron Johnson wrote the following on 27.01.2009 23:05
<- *snip* ->
> My machine:
> $ apt-show-versions > /media/thumb/package.versions.txt
>
> Their machine, when in a minimal state:
> # apt-get install \
> $(cat /media/thumb/package.versions.txt | cut -d/ -f1)
Just a lillte heads up.
At lea
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
# man dpkg
works wonders. :-) Also from the dselect man page:
I think I browsed too many man pages before I replied. The above should
read "from the dpkg man page." :-)
Kevin
http://www.RawFedDogs.net
http://www.WacoAgilityGroup.org
Brucevill
On 01/27/2009 03:23 PM, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
Marcelo,
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
You might transfer this file to another computer, and install it
there with:
dpkg --clear-selections
dpkg --set-selections
and then, in order to install the package
* Marcelo Chiapparini 27.01.2009
> Michael Wagner wrote:
>> it's easy. From the manpage of "dpkg"
>>
>> To make a local copy of the package selection states:
>> dpkg --get-selections >myselections
>>
>> You might transfer this file to another computer, and install it there with:
>>
Marcelo,
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
You might transfer this file to another computer, and install it there
with:
dpkg --clear-selections
dpkg --set-selections
and then, in order to install the packages, should I do "aptitude update"?
# man dpkg
Michael Wagner wrote:
* Marcelo Chiapparini 27.01.2009
I am upgrading my notebook. The old one runs etch like a charm. I want
to run etch in the new notebook too, and to have installed in it exactly
the same packages than in the old one. So,
1) does exist a file with the information of all
1 - 100 of 361 matches
Mail list logo
