[email protected] wrote: > No, it seems you haven't understood. > ....
I assure you that I do understand the need for access to the Built-Using list. What I don't understand is the necessity to transmit a string of 3933 bytes for 87 golang packages for example when a link to the same would suffice for those that actually require it. As a casual user only perusing package information for an introductory cursory look, a list entailing that level of detail doesn't seem to be necessary. -- Stanley C. Kitching Human Being Phoenix, Arizona
