>
> Well, 'exceeding ugly' is quite a subjective statement so I can't be sure
> what you see. Perhaps you are talking about the fact that we reverted back
> to the internal libfreetype used in OOo instead of the Debian version, due
> to many problems experienced by users? This is documented in
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 11:12:29AM -0500, Matt Price wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:21:46AM -0800, Jeff wrote:
> > Matt Price, 2003-Jan-27 12:22 -0500:
> > > just upgraded to OpenOffice 1.0.2, and the fonts are _exceedingly_
> > > ugly, despite the fact that I installed the x-ttcidfont-conf as
hm, thanks for the tip, but it didn't help...
matt
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:21:46AM -0800, Jeff wrote:
> Matt Price, 2003-Jan-27 12:22 -0500:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > just upgraded to OpenOffice 1.0.2, and the fonts are _exceedingly_
> > ugly, despite the fact that I installed the x-ttcidfont-conf
Matt Price, 2003-Jan-27 12:22 -0500:
> Hi folks,
>
> just upgraded to OpenOffice 1.0.2, and the fonts are _exceedingly_
> ugly, despite the fact that I installed the x-ttcidfont-conf as
> suggested by the openoffice package, and up
> dated the FontPath settings in the XServer. I remember having f
4 matches
Mail list logo
