On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 12:55:41AM -0600, Benjamin Pharr wrote:
> At 11:28 PM 1/11/01 , Kenward Vaughan wrote:
...
> >Have you just upgraded to the 2.4.0 kernel? If so, you need to make sure
> >you have the latest modutils package as well, as the older version doesn't
> >recognize the 2.4.0 module
ยป Benjamin Pharr said this and I say that:
> At 11:28 PM 1/11/01 , Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> >Have you just upgraded to the 2.4.0 kernel? If so, you need to make sure
> >you have the latest modutils package as well, as the older version doesn't
> >recognize the 2.4.0 modules directory structure.
At 11:28 PM 1/11/01 , Kenward Vaughan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 11:01:13PM -0600, Benjamin Pharr wrote:
> I have several modules in the /etc/modules file that are supposed to be
> loaded upon boot. I receive an error message for each one saying that
> can't be loaded. I know they were buil
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 11:01:13PM -0600, Benjamin Pharr wrote:
> I have several modules in the /etc/modules file that are supposed to be
> loaded upon boot. I receive an error message for each one saying that
> can't be loaded. I know they were built and installed. I have checked and
> they
4 matches
Mail list logo
