Re: Ghostscript 7.04...

2002-10-03 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:17:36PM -0600, Mike Fontenot wrote: > > Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Try gs-aladdin instead of ghostscript. It has a more-restrictive > > license and is in non-free (the older versions are GPL'd and exist in > > main). I don't know about woody, but sa

Re: Ghostscript 7.04...

2002-10-03 Thread Mike Fontenot
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try gs-aladdin instead of ghostscript. It has a more-restrictive > license and is in non-free (the older versions are GPL'd and exist in > main). I don't know about woody, but sarge has 7.04. It actually WAS gs-aladdin that I installed on my potato sys

Re: Ghostscript 7.04...

2002-10-03 Thread Mike Fontenot
csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The one in unstable is 7.05. I compiled it on my sarge system from the > unstable source. BTW do you really mean woody? Potato is history > ;-) Woody is now the stable distribution. I really AM running potato (except for the fact that I installed gs_aladdin from

Re: Ghostscript 7.04...

2002-10-02 Thread Bob Nielsen
Try gs-aladdin instead of ghostscript. It has a more-restrictive license and is in non-free (the older versions are GPL'd and exist in main). I don't know about woody, but sarge has 7.04. Bob On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 02:14:37PM -0600, Mike Fontenot wrote: > > The versions of ghostscript in pot

Re: Ghostscript 7.04...

2002-10-02 Thread csj
On Wed, 02 Oct 2002 14:14:37 -0600 Mike Fontenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The versions of ghostscript in potato and in woody > don't do an adequate job of converting postscript > to pdf (for a postscript file that I produced using > groff, with some eqn equations). I've been advised > by Der