On Tuesday 02 Aug 2005 21:32, Marco Tasinato wrote:
> Hi! About mail scanner, surfing the net, I found that among a lot of
> programs, the more used is amavis. But I don't know how I can configure
> exim in order to use amavis or others mailscanners and also how configure
> the mailscanners to use
Quoting Marco Tasinato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
But the addressee doesn't know anything about the rejection of this
e-mail and continually calls me in order to know where is his e-mail.
After telling him a lot of time that his e-mail has been refused
because the sender had sent him a virus not by h
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 12:45 am, Marco Tasinato wrote:
> Steve has perfectly understood!
>
> Could you help me?
Maybe if you fix your mailer to stop breaking threads and learn to
quote.
pgp9gTWAYkhcy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Steve has perfectly understood!
Could you help me?
I am looking forward to getting your answer,
thank you very much.
Marco
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 01:16 pm, Marco Tasinato wrote:
> You have perfectly understood!
Who?
http://learn.to/quote
pgphcbdBtzPg1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi! About mail scanner, surfing the net, I
found that among a lot of programs, the more used is amavis. But I don't know
how I can configure exim in order to use amavis or others mailscanners
and also how configure the mailscanners to use clamav. Do you use
exim4-daemon-heavy in your firm?
You have perfectly understood! At the moment my
exim4-daemon-heavy configuration works in this way:
- I receive an e- mail message
- I control if actualy
there is the addressee
- if he exists I accept the message and I begin to
check it, otherwhise I turn it down.
- If the message has been
On Monday 01 Aug 2005 21:04, Marco Tasinato wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a system with Debian Sarge 3.1 STABLE, MTA EXIM4-DAEMON-HEAVY,
> CLAMAV-DAEMON.
>
> I have the following lines in the exim4 configuration file:
>
> av_scanner = clamd:/var/run/clamav/clamd.ctl
>
># Reject messages containing ma
On Monday 01 August 2005 10:24 pm, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > If you need a good example why trusting the From: header blindly
> > like it sounds like you want to do by making ClamAV do exim's job
> > may be found in the recent archives:
>
> You're getting it backwards, Paul.
Paul Johnson wrote:
> If you need a good example why trusting the From: header blindly like
> it sounds like you want to do by making ClamAV do exim's job may be
> found in the recent archives:
You're getting it backwards, Paul. He wants to notify the person the mail
is supposedly going to
On Monday 01 August 2005 01:35 pm, Marco Tasinato wrote:
> I know this is a very irksome thing but I can't delete an important
> e-mail (that for mistake has got a virus) without saying it to my
> customer.
If you need a good example why trusting the From: header blindly like
it sounds like you w
On Monday 01 August 2005 01:04 pm, Marco Tasinato wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a system with Debian Sarge 3.1 STABLE, MTA
> EXIM4-DAEMON-HEAVY, CLAMAV-DAEMON.
>
> I have the following lines in the exim4 configuration file:
>
> av_scanner = clamd:/var/run/clamav/clamd.ctl
>
># Reject messages contain
On (01/08/05 22:35), Marco Tasinato wrote:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: Marco Tasinato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 22:35:10 +0200
> Subject: Re: Exim4 + Clamav
>
> I know this is a very irksome thing but I can&#
I know this is a very irksome thing but I
can't delete an important e-mail (that for mistake has got a virus) without
saying it to my customer.
Thanks
Marco
Marco Tasinato wrote:
> In this way clamav intercept the virus, exim4 reject the e-mail message
> without notifying it to the receiver.
> How can I enable clamav to sent an notification e-mail to the receiver
> when clamav finds a virus and exim turns it down???
The more important question is
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 09:43:41PM +0930, David Purton wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:04:07PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > David Purton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I have a question about virus scanning at smtp time. Sadly
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:04:07PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Purton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have a question about virus scanning at smtp time. Sadly I still
> > find Exim4 acl stuff a bit of a black art :(
> >
> > Sometimes
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 20:07, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Actually you can go further than that here is a sample from my config
> > file (I have recombined into a single exim4.conf file) Not only can
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually you can go further than that here is a sample from my config
> file (I have recombined into a single exim4.conf file) Not only can
> you reject malformed mime, you can reject certain attachments and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Purton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a question about virus scanning at smtp time. Sadly I still
> find Exim4 acl stuff a bit of a black art :(
>
> Sometimes a virus that clamav *does* already know about gets through.
That's usually a ne
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 08:12, David Purton wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 07:27:39AM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 August 2004 02:25, David Purton wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > It offers these lines, which might help in
> > > /etc/exim4/conf.d/acl/40_exim4-config_check_data:
> > >
>
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 07:27:39AM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 August 2004 02:25, David Purton wrote:
> ...
> >
> > It offers these lines, which might help in
> > /etc/exim4/conf.d/acl/40_exim4-config_check_data:
> >
> >
> > deny message = This message contains malformed MIME ($demi
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 02:25, David Purton wrote:
...
>
> It offers these lines, which might help in
> /etc/exim4/conf.d/acl/40_exim4-config_check_data:
>
>
> deny message = This message contains malformed MIME ($demime_reason)
> demime = *
> condition = ${if >{$demime_errorlevel}{2}{1}{0}}
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:44:48AM -0700, Steve C. Lamb wrote:
| Nothing says exim must use port 25 and, IIRC, there's a recipe on the Exim
| site which explains how to divert a copy of mail to another MTA for testing
| purposes. Throw it on :2525 and see how it works? Just thinking aloud.
If y
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:39:28AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:21:35PM +0100, Pigeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > chroot?
> No.
> The ports aren't chrooted, so you're sharing the same :25 with the
> parent.
> However user-mode Linux would work, on a separat
on Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:21:35PM +0100, Pigeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:14:07PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:36:26PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:36:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > How wou
On Sunday 12 October 2003 13:28, Paul Johnson wrote:
> This howto seems to assume Red Hat, and I've never used exiscan
> before. I tried to adapt, but doing so breaks exim. Is there a
> howto that doesn't assume a retarded (RPM-based) distro?
It was really useful to me, I'm pretty sure my Exim c
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 04:28:12AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> This howto seems to assume Red Hat, and I've never used exiscan
> before. I tried to adapt, but doing so breaks exim. Is there a howto
> that doesn't assume a retarded (RPM-based) distro?
Odd. The how-to was straight forward fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:14:34AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 02:37:47 -0700
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:12:41AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > > There isn't, really. My approach was to tr
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:14:07PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:36:26PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:36:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > How would I install exim4 .deb on woody for testing (i.e. without
> > > replacing the curr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:09:25PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> It is compiled into exim4-daemon-heavy so just install that package. I
> think I had read somewhere that Andreas might eventually include exiscan-acl
> into exim4-daemon-light. I may b
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:48:54 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup, I found it. I like how KDE 3.2 finally has some kpdf
> integration.
> Question, though: Where do you get exiscan in debian form for exim4?
It is compiled into exim4-daemon-heavy so just install that package.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:14:34AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Close enough. Got a howto?
>
> I found a pretty good how-to on-line with Google. Search on "exiscan-acl
> clamav pdf". It should be the 2nd link.
Yup, I found it. I like how KDE
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:36:26PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:36:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > How would I install exim4 .deb on woody for testing (i.e. without
> > replacing the current exim package)?
>
> You don't. They're mutually exclusive.
So to test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:36:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How would I install exim4 .deb on woody for testing (i.e. without
> replacing the current exim package)?
You don't. They're mutually exclusive.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMA
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:25:55AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:46:48PM -0700, Jeremy Brooks wrote:
> > Is there a package of exim 4 for woody? My smtp server is woody, and I
> > really have no desire to upgrade it to a more recent distro.
>
> Have you searched apt-get.
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 17:28, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > and modifies the Subject-line
> > to include *SPAM** rather than just add another one.
> > Any ideas on how to do this?
>
> To be honest, no.
Actually, I discovered at least how to rewrite the Subject line, it's in
example 3 in
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:20:00 +0200
Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I think I would prefer that it behaved as the current
> SpamAssassin do, that is, it makes an attachment out of the original
> message, inserts the report in the body, and modifies the Subject-line
> to inclu
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 02:37:47 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:12:41AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > There isn't, really. My approach was to try to create a new eval()
> > test in SA which called clamav. I ended up installing
> > exim4-daemon-heavy and usin
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 22:46, Steve Lamb wrote:
> What do you want to do? exiscan-acl can also query Spamassassin
> and reject at SMTP time. The main reason to go with sa-exim is to
> get the extra features it offers. Those features being saving the
> message easily, teergrubing and such
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:12:41AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 01:24:27 -0700
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been curious on how to tie in virus scanning to sa-exim as well,
> > post it to this list if you figure
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 23:27, Alan Shutko wrote:
> In my experience, still really, really good. I haven't been getting
> any additional false possitives, and I haven't been missing any more
> spam than normal.
I see. Well, I haven't read up on how the Bayesian filter works (though
I have b
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 01:24:27 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been curious on how to tie in virus scanning to sa-exim as well,
> post it to this list if you figure it out.
There isn't, really. My approach was to try to create a new eval() test
in SA which called clamav. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:46:48PM -0700, Jeremy Brooks wrote:
> Is there a package of exim 4 for woody? My smtp server is woody, and I
> really have no desire to upgrade it to a more recent distro.
Have you searched apt-get.org yet?
- --
.''`.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 10:05:43PM +0200, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> Yeah, that's one option. I considered it, but the problem is, if you
> feed the learner with tons of similar viruses, how good will it be to
> kill spam...?
Bayesian filtering goes o
* Jeremy Brooks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031007 17:04]:
> Is there a package of exim 4 for woody? My smtp server is woody, and I
> really have no desire to upgrade it to a more recent distro.
Yes, courtesy of Andreas Metzler:
# exim4 and gnutls from andreas metzler
deb http://www.logic.univie.ac.at/
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 16:06, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:27:31PM -0500, Alan Shutko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Tuesday 07 October 2003 19:48, Alfredo Valles wrote:
> >
> > >> I was near suicide when some good guy
on Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:27:31PM -0500, Alan Shutko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tuesday 07 October 2003 19:48, Alfredo Valles wrote:
>
> >> I was near suicide when some good guy in this list recommended me
> >> spamassissin. It's so easy to
Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 07 October 2003 19:48, Alfredo Valles wrote:
>> I was near suicide when some good guy in this list recommended me
>> spamassissin. It's so easy to get to work and once that you train the
>> bayesian filter bye bye to all the stupids swen ma
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 22:05:43 +0200
Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, that's one option. I considered it, but the problem is, if you
> feed the learner with tons of similar viruses, how good will it be to
> kill spam...? Also, if you feed those to Vipul's Razor, what would it
> me
50 matches
Mail list logo
