-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 10:05:43PM +0200, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > Yeah, that's one option. I considered it, but the problem is, if you > feed the learner with tons of similar viruses, how good will it be to > kill spam...?
Bayesian filtering goes on what *you* consider spam, not the traditional definition. > Also, if you feed those to Vipul's Razor, what would it > mean for Razor....? Potentially, the virus infected messages get flagged as spam by razor, which isn't neccisarilly a Bad Thing. > I'm working on it right now, actually. I have just upgraded my mail > server to Exim4. I think I would recommend that to everyone. If you ask > for help on the Exim users list about Exim 3, people don't remember > what it was like running Exim 3 anymore, so you're quite lost... :-) Which is really strange, since it's the same MTA, just different layout of the configs which makes it easier to take advantage of the more advanced features. > What I've done is to install exim4-daemon-heavy and clamav-daemon, then > have a DATA ACL reject certain executables, then pass it to clamd if > that didn't do the trick. They are rejected in the SMTP dialogue, if I > got this right (somebody correct me if I'm wrong, ASAP :-) ), so the > bounce doesn't hit an innocent bystander. I wouldn't reject arbitrarily on filenames but the rest sounds good. > Before I run along to the sa-exim mailing list, has anybody here got it > working? I've been curious on how to tie in virus scanning to sa-exim as well, post it to this list if you figure it out. - -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin and user `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/g8m7UzgNqloQMwcRAsRkAJ9vVB0bDk0uHFvEHs5XCJu0IsXIrwCgqC3+ BNaxJmQRi1MmAmthGgoDHOo= =PREa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
