On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:50:06PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > Given the corruption happens at high block numbers, I'm wondering
> > if maybe there's some kind of wraparound bug happening here.
> > (Though why only the 0x00 pattern fails would still be a mystery).
>
> Yeah, that seems
2009/1/20 Aaron Greenspan :
> Hello again,
>
> For the sake of context and in case it got lost in the shuffle, I wrote this
> post last night: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/01/msg01928.html
>
> Now, after several days of troubleshooting involving ext3-fs errors,
> formatting problems, in
Aaron Greenspan wrote:
Therefore, I think it's safe to say that the Syba SD-SATA-4P and the
corresponding Silicon Image 3114 chipset have a fairly narrow appeal:
they work in 32-bit 5V PCI slots only, on consumer systems only, which
are running only the following operating systems that I own: n
Hello again,
For the sake of context and in case it got lost in the shuffle, I wrote
this post last night:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/01/msg01928.html
Now, after several days of troubleshooting involving ext3-fs errors,
formatting problems, inexplicable read-only filesystem mou
Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:30:42AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Robert Hancock wrote:
> >> There are apparently some reports of issues on NVidia chipsets as
> >> well, though I don't have any details at hand.
> >
> > Well, Carlos' email bounces, so much for that one. Anyone h
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:30:42AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Robert Hancock wrote:
> >> There are apparently some reports of issues on NVidia chipsets as
> >> well, though I don't have any details at hand.
> >
> > Well, Carlos' email bounces, so much for that one. Anyone have any other
> > c
Hi,
In case this is helpful to anyone, I've also been having similar issues
with the Syba SD-SATA-4P PCI RAID controller, which is based on the
Silicon Image 3114 chip. I've been using Western Digital 250GB hard
drives of various models, however, and there are no nVidia components
presents in
Robert Hancock wrote:
>> There are apparently some reports of issues on NVidia chipsets as
>> well, though I don't have any details at hand.
>
> Well, Carlos' email bounces, so much for that one. Anyone have any other
> contacts at Silicon Image?
I'll ping my SIMG contacts but I've pinged about t
I hope the problem is solved!
Make sure you do not run dmraid and mdadm !
So, if you have truble mdadm RAID, check you do not run dmraid !
I found this.
/etc/rcS.d/S04dmraid
/etc/rcS.d/S25mdadm-raid
/etc/rc0.d/S50mdadm-raid
/etc/rc0.d/S51dmraid
/etc/rc6.d/S50mdadm-raid
/etc/rc6.d/S51dmraid
T
Robert Hancock wrote:
Bernd Schubert wrote:
I think it's something related to setting up the PCI side of things.
There have been hints that incorrect CLS setting was the culprit and I
tried thte combinations but without any success and unfortunately the
problem wasn't reproducible with the hardw
Bernd Schubert wrote:
I think it's something related to setting up the PCI side of things.
There have been hints that incorrect CLS setting was the culprit and I
tried thte combinations but without any success and unfortunately the
problem wasn't reproducible with the hardware I have here. :-(
I hope the problem is solved!
Make sure you do not run dmraid and mdadm !
So, if you have truble mdadm RAID, check you do not run dmraid !
I found this.
/etc/rcS.d/S04dmraid
/etc/rcS.d/S25mdadm-raid
/etc/rc0.d/S50mdadm-raid
/etc/rc0.d/S51dmraid
/etc/rc6.d/S50mdadm-raid
/etc/rc6.d/S51dmraid
Th
I hope the problem is solved!
Make sure you do not run dmraid and mdadm !
So, if you have truble mdadm RAID, check you do not run dmraid !
I found this.
/etc/rcS.d/S04dmraid
/etc/rcS.d/S25mdadm-raid
/etc/rc0.d/S50mdadm-raid
/etc/rc0.d/S51dmraid
/etc/rc6.d/S50mdadm-raid
/etc/rc6.d/S51dmraid
Th
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 06:38:28 Robert Hancock wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Bernd Schubert wrote:
> >> But now more than a year has passed again without doing anything
> >> about it and actually this is what I strongly criticize. Most people
> >> don't know about issues like t
Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Bernd Schubert wrote:
But now more than a year has passed again without doing anything
about it and actually this is what I strongly criticize. Most people
don't know about issues like that and don't run file checksum tests
as I now always do before taking a disk into pr
Hello,
Bernd Schubert wrote:
> But now more than a year has passed again without doing anything
> about it and actually this is what I strongly criticize. Most people
> don't know about issues like that and don't run file checksum tests
> as I now always do before taking a disk into production. So
cc: linux-ide, linux-raid
There was some talk about corruption on these chips I believe, hopefully
someone on the list can offer further insight.
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Justin Piszcz skrev:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Justin Piszcz skrev:
On Sun,
Justin Piszcz skrev:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Justin Piszcz skrev:
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Bengt Samuelsson skrev:
~# mdadm -D /dev/md0
--
/dev/md0:
Version : 00.90.03
Creation Time : Fri Sep 12 19:08:22 2008
Justin Piszcz skrev:
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Bengt Samuelsson skrev:
~# mdadm -D /dev/md0
--
/dev/md0:
Version : 00.90.03
Creation Time : Fri Sep 12 19:08:22 2008
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 1465151616 (1397.28 GiB 1500.
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Justin Piszcz skrev:
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Bengt Samuelsson skrev:
~# mdadm -D /dev/md0
--
/dev/md0:
Version : 00.90.03
Creation Time : Fri Sep 12 19:08:22 2008
Raid Level : raid5
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Bengt Samuelsson skrev:
Justin Piszcz skrev:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Hi,
I need some support for this soft-raid system.
I am running it as RAID5 with 4 samsung spinpoint 500G SATA300 tot 1.3T
byte
And it runs in http:/
Bengt Samuelsson skrev:
Justin Piszcz skrev:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Hi,
I need some support for this soft-raid system.
I am running it as RAID5 with 4 samsung spinpoint 500G SATA300 tot
1.3T byte
And it runs in http://sm7jqb.dnsalias.com
I use mdadm sytem in a Debi
Bengt Samuelsson skrev:
Justin Piszcz skrev:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Hi,
I need some support for this soft-raid system.
I am running it as RAID5 with 4 samsung spinpoint 500G SATA300 tot
1.3T byte
And it runs in http://sm7jqb.dnsalias.com
I use mdadm sytem in a Debi
Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need some support for this soft-raid system.
>
> I am running it as RAID5 with 4 samsung spinpoint 500G SATA300 tot 1.3T
> byte
>
> And it runs in http://sm7jqb.dnsalias.com
> I use mdadm sytem in a Debian Linux
> CPU 1.2Mhz 1G memory ( my older 433Mhz / 51
Bernd Schubert wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 02:53:09PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
Bernd Schubert wrote:
[sorry sent again, since Robert dropped all mailing list CCs and I
didn't notice first]
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 12:31:12PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
Bernd Schubert wrote:
On Sat, J
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Hello Bengt,
>
> sil3114 is known to cause data corruption with some disks. So far I only know
> about Seagate, but maybe there issues with newer Samsungs as well?
I've experienced data corruption with a SII 0680 ACLU144 (on an ST
Labs' A-13
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 02:53:09PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> Bernd Schubert wrote:
>> [sorry sent again, since Robert dropped all mailing list CCs and I
>> didn't notice first]
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 12:31:12PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
>>> Bernd Schubert wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03,
Bernd Schubert wrote:
[sorry sent again, since Robert dropped all mailing list CCs and I didn't
notice first]
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 12:31:12PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
Bernd Schubert wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 01:39:36PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:30:07 +0100
Bern
[sorry sent again, since Robert dropped all mailing list CCs and I didn't
notice first]
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 12:31:12PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> Bernd Schubert wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 01:39:36PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:30:07 +0100
>>> Bernd Schubert wr
Bernd Schubert wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 01:39:36PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:30:07 +0100
Bernd Schubert wrote:
Hello Bengt,
sil3114 is known to cause data corruption with some disks.
News to me. There are a few people with lots of SI and other devices
No no, you
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 01:39:36PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:30:07 +0100
> Bernd Schubert wrote:
>
> > Hello Bengt,
> >
> > sil3114 is known to cause data corruption with some disks.
>
> News to me. There are a few people with lots of SI and other devices
No no, you just
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:30:07 +0100
Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Hello Bengt,
>
> sil3114 is known to cause data corruption with some disks.
News to me. There are a few people with lots of SI and other devices
jammed into the same mainboard who had problems but that doesn't appear
to be an SI problem
On Saturday 03 January 2009 03:31:57 Redeeman wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 22:30 +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > Hello Bengt,
> >
> > sil3114 is known to cause data corruption with some disks. So far I only
> > know about Seagate, but maybe there issues with newer Samsungs as well?
> >
> > http:
Justin Piszcz skrev:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Hi,
I need some support for this soft-raid system.
I am running it as RAID5 with 4 samsung spinpoint 500G SATA300 tot
1.3T byte
And it runs in http://sm7jqb.dnsalias.com
I use mdadm sytem in a Debian Linux
CPU 1.2Mhz 1G me
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 22:30 +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Hello Bengt,
>
> sil3114 is known to cause data corruption with some disks. So far I only know
> about Seagate, but maybe there issues with newer Samsungs as well?
>
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0710.2/2035.html
>
> U
Hello Bengt,
sil3114 is known to cause data corruption with some disks. So far I only know
about Seagate, but maybe there issues with newer Samsungs as well?
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0710.2/2035.html
Unfortuntely this issue has been simply ignored by the SATA developers :(
Hi,
I also had problems with the sata_sil driver with more than one
silicon image card in the same machine about a year or two back. Don't
remember the specifics, but basically the cards would occasionally
drop the SATA link. This was with Western Digital drives. With a
Samsung 750GB disk the disk
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Hi,
I need some support for this soft-raid system.
I am running it as RAID5 with 4 samsung spinpoint 500G SATA300 tot 1.3T
byte
And it runs in http://sm7jqb.dnsalias.com
I use mdadm sytem in a Debian
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Hi,
I need some support for this soft-raid system.
I am running it as RAID5 with 4 samsung spinpoint 500G SATA300 tot 1.3T byte
And it runs in http://sm7jqb.dnsalias.com
I use mdadm sytem in a Debian Linux
CPU 1.2Mhz 1G memory ( my older 433Mhz /
39 matches
Mail list logo
