On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 02:28:23 +0100, Jens Tobiska wrote:
> I am running sid/stretch and noticed that for some time now, around 200
> packages have been "kept back" when doing "apt-get upgrade".
Try an apt-get dist-upgrade. Apt-get upgrade only updates packages with new
versions available, while d
Well, I bit the bullet and went ahead with it. My sytem seems to be
sane, although I did get many scary warnings from dpkg during the
upgrade. I also got many complaints from perl about problems setting
the locales for several packages, but I suppose that has nothing to do
with the original
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I run a somewhat out of date installation of Testing. When trying to
> update
> some packages, apt-get fails with the following message:
>
> ---
> E: This installation run will require temporarily removing the essential
> package e2fsprogs due to a Conflicts/P
> Well, move the order of the cards around and resetting the BIOS resource
> config probably will help greatly. Most NICs hate to share. But then so
> do many nvidia cards.
On the motherboard there are 4 buses for the audiocard and NIC to share
(short white ones). Anything placed in bus-1 gives a
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 22:17 +0100, Vegard Lundby Rekaa wrote:
> My soundcard is malfunctioning because of a conflict with my network-card.
> I quote to a conversation with Greg Folkert:
> "
>I used to use 3com cards all the time. Then the 3c905a/b debacle with
> Microsoft "demanding" 3com
[...]
Hello Pepijn!
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:47:11AM +0100, Kenter, Pepijn wrote:
Last Friday I tried to upgrade to KDE-3 in debian testing. The problem is my
KDE-2 is
uninstalled now while KDE-3 refuses to install.
When I select kdebase package (4:3.1.4-0woody1), I get the following
conflicts:
[...]
Quoting Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 02:11:45PM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > I am trying to upgrade from stable to testing.
>
> Are you very sure that you don't mean "from stable to unstable"?
>
Using "apt-cache policy debianutils coreutils" reveals the ugly
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 02:11:45PM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade from stable to testing.
Are you very sure that you don't mean "from stable to unstable"?
> I am running into problems with files shared between packages.
> Examples are /etc/dpkg/dselect.cfg, shared by dpk
On 18-Apr-2002 Ted wrote:
> Hi.
> I am trying to install the gnome games package uning gnome apt but it
> tells me
> " The following packages have unmet dependencies libguile9: Conflicts
> libguile6 but 1:1.3.4-2 is installed."
> ..Any help appreciated.
>
can you remove libguile6?
--
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 06:36:16PM +0100, Ted wrote:
| Hi.
| I am trying to install the gnome games package uning gnome apt but
| it tells me
| " The following packages have unmet dependencies libguile9: Conflicts
| libguile6 but 1:1.3.4-2 is installed."
| ..Any help appreciated.
You
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Thomas Halahan wrote:
>
> I have upgraded glibc to 2.1.94-3. During this process I have had
> the same problems as many. i.e.
>
> * libdb.so.3 not found
> * ldconfig disappears
>
> But now my apt (dselsct and gnome-apt) shows many unsolved
> dependencies which become ver
Thomas Halahan wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for your promt reply. Much appreciated. I didn't quite
> understand this:
>
> > I fixed this with a link to a libdb?.so in /lib via /lib/libdb.so.3,
> > and after that, the upgrade to a new libdb worked.
>
> Do I just install libdb and manually link
Hello,
Thanks for your promt reply. Much appreciated. I didn't quite
understand this:
> I fixed this with a link to a libdb?.so in /lib via /lib/libdb.so.3,
> and after that, the upgrade to a new libdb worked.
Do I just install libdb and manually link libdb2.so.3 back to the new
libc6.so.
On Mon, Oct 26, 1998 at 08:40:20AM -0600, Lance Arsenault wrote:
> It's a pain to have to pick through 1000 + packages to install. I prefer to
> just
> install all of them without picking through them. Hard disk space is now
> cheep,
> and time is not.
You don't have to pick through 4000+ packa
>
> It should be easier for "normal" packages (without daemons, inetd.conf
> enties etc.) to have two conflicting packages installed. For example,
> I'd like to have gs-alladin and gs installed in parallel; gs-alladin
> for it's pdf support, and gs for it's better Epson Stylus Color driver.
> But
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jack Nutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That being said, perhaps there should be a predefined installation selection
>(among the listed configurations you get when you run dselect on a new
>installation) where something as close as possible to "everything" is
Please, if you are cc:-ing me, only cc my reply-to address.
On Wed, Oct 28, 1998 at 11:46:32AM -0500, Person, Rod wrote:
> This morning I was rebuilding my system and I selected perl and
> perl-base. And a got a strange conflict dependency error. It said:
>
> perl (version numbers from hamm stabl
Rod Person
"Humanity is the biggest cancer ever to be seen!"
-Alx Hellid
Contempt
> --
> From: Jiri Baum[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 1998 2:17 PM
> To: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> debian-user@lists
Hello,
Antti-Juhani wrote on debian-user:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 1998 at 11:05:42AM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
...
> > I would agree however, that a good description of each package would
> > help you decide what to install.
>
> Please tell me, what you would consider a good description! Feel fre
Hello,
Antti-Juhani wrote on debian-user:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 1998 at 11:05:42AM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
...
> > I would agree however, that a good description of each package would
> > help you decide what to install.
>
> Please tell me, what you would consider a good description! Feel free
On Tue, Oct 27, 1998 at 07:16:55PM +0100, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote:
: If I understand well our Debian policy, you should be able to install ALL
: packages having priority >= optional, i.e. all packages but those having
: "extra" priority.
:
: Therefore if you find one optional package that
Hi.
If I understand well our Debian policy, you should be able to install
ALL packages having priority >= optional, i.e. all packages but those
having "extra" priority.
Therefore if you find one optional package that conflicts with another
optional package, then it is a bug and you may report it
On Mon, Oct 26, 1998 at 09:38:46PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 1998 at 11:05:42AM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
>
> The point Kenneth is making is true. However:
>
> > You can't have two (or more) mail clients installed at the same
> > time,
> ...
> > There are at least
On Mon, Oct 26, 1998 at 11:05:42AM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
The point Kenneth is making is true. However:
> You can't have two (or more) mail clients installed at the same
> time,
...
> There are at least half a dozen window managers in X for example,
> you can only use one. Here though all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lance Arsenault) writes:
> I just would like to know if Debian 2.0 has conflicting software
> in it like Debian 1.3.1 .
>
> Background: Debian 1.3.1 would not let you install all the software
> in the release. Installing all the software in the release saves a
> lot of time
[ about conflicts when installing everything in debian ]
Jack Nutting wrote:
> That being said, perhaps there should be a predefined
> installation selection (among the listed configurations you get
> when you run dselect on a new installation) where something as
> close as possible to "everything
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 1998, Lance Arsenault wrote:
>
> > Background: Debian 1.3.1 would not let you install all the software
> > in the release. Installing all the software in the release saves a
> > lot of time, and hard drive space is cheeper than time.
> >
> > I have used D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 26 Oct 1998, Lance Arsenault wrote:
> Background: Debian 1.3.1 would not let you install all the software
> in the release. Installing all the software in the release saves a
> lot of time, and hard drive space is cheeper than time.
>
> I have used
28 matches
Mail list logo
