On Vi, 03 sep 21, 19:05:23, Daniel M. wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm running debian testing ("bookworm" at the moment) and have firefox
> 88 installed from unstable. My sources.list contains testing and
> unstable main, contrib and non-free lines and I have pinning set up to
> 900 testing, 500 unst
On 9/5/21, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> This is the problem with web browsers getting bigger, more complex
> dependencies, more infrastructure complexities - and it has always
> been so. Web browsers are also the go-to applications for stress
> testing any machine once again.
You nailed that! Mi
On Sun 05 Sep 2021 at 19:31:32 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 08:56:36PM +0200, Oliver Schoede wrote:
> > On Fri, 03 Sep 2021 20:50:06 +0200
> > Sven Joachim wrote:
> > >
> > >Version 91 is only in experimental.
> > >
> >
> > Probably blocked by some Rust stuff again.
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 08:56:36PM +0200, Oliver Schoede wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Sep 2021 20:50:06 +0200
> Sven Joachim wrote:
> >
> >Version 91 is only in experimental.
> >
>
> Probably blocked by some Rust stuff again. Anyone who's waiting and if
> possible please get a flatpak and get on with your
On Fri, 03 Sep 2021 20:50:06 +0200
Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>Version 91 is only in experimental.
>
Probably blocked by some Rust stuff again. Anyone who's waiting and if
possible please get a flatpak and get on with your life. Debian is
providing that for a reason, too. We've been at the same point
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 13:50:19 +0200
"Daniel M." wrote:
> To my understanding, unstable has 91.0.1-1 and experimental has
> 91.0.1-2 as seen in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/firefox.
>
Or you can download v92.0.b9 from
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/developer/
The button links to:
http
rhkra...@gmail.com writes:
> Top posting and not quoting anything as I'm coming from a different POV.
>
> If the OP needs firefox 91 (or whatever), there is another option, installing
> the package available from Mozilla as a separate executable.
Sure. I've had an issue with the Debian Buster's
Top posting and not quoting anything as I'm coming from a different POV.
If the OP needs firefox 91 (or whatever), there is another option, installing
the package available from Mozilla as a separate executable.
(Aside: I had to do that (for an earlier version of Firefox) because a website
that
> If you mean the line from that page "[2021-08-18] Accepted firefox
> 91.0.1-1 (source) into unstable (Mike Hommey)", that doesn't mean binary
> packages are available as you've noticed.
Okay, that explains it. In fact, i was referring to the versions table
in the left column.
> I don't actually
"Daniel M." writes:
> The debian package tracker (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/firefox)
> states that version 91.0.1-1 of firefox should be available, but I can
> in no way install it.
If you mean the line from that page "[2021-08-18] Accepted firefox
91.0.1-1 (source) into unstable (Mike Homm
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 01:50:19PM +0200, Daniel M. wrote:
> To my understanding, unstable has 91.0.1-1 and experimental has
> 91.0.1-2 as seen in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/firefox.
>
The buildd status page for the firefox package [0] shows that the
builders have the package in state BD-Unins
On Samstag, 4. September 2021 07:50:19 -04 Daniel M. wrote:
> To my understanding, unstable has 91.0.1-1 and experimental has
> 91.0.1-2 as seen in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/firefox.
Unstable here still with 88.0.1-1 not 91...
same as OP
Have no time neither today nor tomorrow to look into pr
To my understanding, unstable has 91.0.1-1 and experimental has
91.0.1-2 as seen in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/firefox.
On 2021-09-03 19:05 +0200, Daniel M. wrote:
> I'm running debian testing ("bookworm" at the moment) and have firefox
> 88 installed from unstable. My sources.list contains testing and
> unstable main, contrib and non-free lines and I have pinning set up to
> 900 testing, 500 unstable. Default-Rele
14 matches
Mail list logo
