Andrei Popescu said:
> Sylpheed and Claws-Mail have Win32 versions.
And they reply correctly to mailing lists.
Cybe R. Wizard
--
Nice computers don't go down.
Larry Niven, Steven Barnes
"The Barsoom Project"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debia
On Mon,05.Jan.09, 15:27:44, Ken Teague wrote:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail
> > replies
> > to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually, appears
> > to
> > be a violation on the relevant standards.
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:20:14 +0100 (CET), Moderation Robot in
gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>> I believe the (quite valid) suggestion to ditch Gmail is because it
>> does not have a 'reply to list function'. Well, there are several
>> other reasons, but this is the o
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 07:37:39 -0500, Paul Cartwright in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
> On Tue January 6 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> I am using "mutt" since 9 years now and currently I have open four XTerm
>> running "mutt". There is nothing which does not work on it.
>>
>> Thanks, Greetings
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 01/07/09 05:30, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>> iceape-mailnews ;-)
> The MUA that starts with Ice and isn't the red-headed step-child...
Ice ice baby?
Da dun nun da nunnun?
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream
PGP Key: 1FC
On 01/07/09 05:30, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:44:48PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/06/09 22:37, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:27:46PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/06/09 21:48, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Are you using stock Tbird, or Icew
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:44:48PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 01/06/09 22:37, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:27:46PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> On 01/06/09 21:48, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain pa
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I agree and there has been work on that. However, I've yet to see a good
> UI for composing sieve scripts. I think one of the webmail packages
> SquirelMail(?) or RoundCube(?) has the beginning of a UI.
Squirrelmail, with the appropriate addon activated.
--
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Steve Lamb wrote about 'Re:
[OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply':
>Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> I prefer a sieve, the standard language for server-side mail filtering,
>> implementation on my IMAP (and manag
Ron Johnson wrote:
> God must not love you.
Being an Atheist I'm used to it.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream
PGP Key: 1FC01004 | and dream I do
---+-
signature.
On 01/06/09 22:37, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:27:46PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/06/09 21:48, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain patches
needed by r-t-l.)
Stock from Ubuntu/Debian packaging respectively
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:27:46PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 01/06/09 21:48, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain patches
>>> needed by r-t-l.)
>>
>> Stock from Ubuntu/Debian packaging respectively. Both of which have
>> ha
On 01/06/09 21:48, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain patches
needed by r-t-l.)
Stock from Ubuntu/Debian packaging respectively. Both of which have
had the patch as part of the Debian version for close to 2 years now (I think).
On 01/06/09 18:53, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Ron?
Am 2009-01-06 13:07:16, schrieb Ron Johnson:
maildrop is what you want. *Much* more rational than procmail.
(But then, I like Python...)
Maildrop is the last thing one would install... The
same for Sieve. If you try to konfigure those
Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> Maildrop is the last thing one would install... The
> same for Sieve. If you try to konfigure those blobs
> you will get knots and cancer in your brain.
>
Glad to see you're as rational as ever.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I prefer a sieve, the standard language for server-side mail filtering,
> implementation on my IMAP (and managesieve) server.
If only mail clients would incorporate sieve into their normal filtering.
IE, my dad probably can't write sieve filters but he can use
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain patches
> needed by r-t-l.)
Stock from Ubuntu/Debian packaging respectively. Both of which have
had the patch as part of the Debian version for close to 2 years now (I think).
--
Steve C. Lamb |
Hello Ron?
Am 2009-01-06 13:07:16, schrieb Ron Johnson:
> maildrop is what you want. *Much* more rational than procmail.
> (But then, I like Python...)
Maildrop is the last thing one would install... The
same for Sieve. If you try to konfigure those blobs
you will get knots and cancer in you
Hi,
Am 2009-01-06 12:09:24, schrieb hose:
> I used to use pine too - loved it. I switched to mutt shortly after
> college at the encouragement of a number of coworkers. It was
> unfortunately terrible for the first couple hours. Then someone gave
> me their .muttrc and it was like the who
On 01/06/09 13:44, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Tuesday 2009 January 06 13:07:16 Ron Johnson wrote:
I use procmail.
maildrop is what you want.
I prefer a sieve, the standard language for server-side mail filtering,
implementation on my IMAP (and managesieve) server.
Google doesn't seem
On Tuesday 2009 January 06 13:07:16 Ron Johnson wrote:
> > I use procmail.
>
> maildrop is what you want.
I prefer a sieve, the standard language for server-side mail filtering,
implementation on my IMAP (and managesieve) server.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@ig
On 01/06/09 11:51, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Tue January 6 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
Mine is the same that Debian Iceweasel has always been, but with
Mnenhy and Reply To List add-ons.
--
where do you get this add-on??
There are two addons which claim to do the same thing. I use the
one fro
On Jan 6, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/06/09 12:36, hose wrote:
On Jan 6, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
[snip]
yeah, I can see that.. in kmail I have over 200 filters.. that
will be the
hardest part...
[snip]
I've never done email filtering in mutt though, so I c
On 01/06/09 08:09, Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
I have RTL 0.2.0 on there from a suggestion you made a while back about
0.3.1 not playing nice with IMAP while the older version did.
Older versions needed either Mnenhy(which you have) or Enigmail(which I
have) to work. 0.3.0 do
On 01/06/09 12:36, hose wrote:
On Jan 6, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
[snip]
yeah, I can see that.. in kmail I have over 200 filters.. that will be
the
hardest part...
[snip]
I've never done email filtering in mutt though, so I can't speak to
that. I use procmail instead,
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 01:01:18PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2009-01-05 18:13:32, schrieb hose:
> > Just use the least sucky client out there (mutt). It has sane reply,
> > reply-to, and reply-to-list commands, is extremely fast, and can bend
> > to your will if needed, no matter how
On Jan 6, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Tue January 6 2009, hose wrote:
These days people seem to enjoy posting their config files online
with
screenshots, so you can see what you get. It's usually a good
starting place. I suppose this is why people call mutt a frontend to
a
On Tue January 6 2009, hose wrote:
> These days people seem to enjoy posting their config files online with
> screenshots, so you can see what you get. It's usually a good
> starting place. I suppose this is why people call mutt a frontend to
> a config file.
>
> http://wiki.mutt.org/?Confi
On Tue January 6 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Mine is the same that Debian Iceweasel has always been, but with
> Mnenhy and Reply To List add-ons.
>
> --
where do you get this add-on?? google search wasn't too helpful.
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800
Registered Ubuntu User #12459
On Jan 6, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Tue January 6 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote:
I am using "mutt" since 9 years now and currently I have open four
XTerm
running "mutt". There is nothing which does not work on it.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
I used pine 20 year
Steve Lamb wrote:
> I have RTL 0.2.0 on there from a suggestion you made a while back about
> 0.3.1 not playing nice with IMAP while the older version did.
> Older versions needed either Mnenhy(which you have) or Enigmail(which I
> have) to work. 0.3.0 does not need either. But here's th
On 01/06/09 08:02, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
My User-Agent string is a lot more "rich" than yours. Are you
purposefully minimizing it, or could it be a co-symptom of what
ever is the real reason why r-t-l doesn't work for you?
Yours seems to be inflated for some reason.
Here's
On 01/06/09 07:52, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
My User-Agent string is a lot more "rich" than yours. Are you
purposefully minimizing it, or could it be a co-symptom of what
ever is the real reason why r-t-l doesn't work for you?
Probably not. This one better? Still no r-t-l her
Ron Johnson wrote:
> My User-Agent string is a lot more "rich" than yours. Are you
> purposefully minimizing it, or could it be a co-symptom of what
> ever is the real reason why r-t-l doesn't work for you?
Yours seems to be inflated for some reason.
Here's yours:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X1
Ron Johnson wrote:
> My User-Agent string is a lot more "rich" than yours. Are you
> purposefully minimizing it, or could it be a co-symptom of what
> ever is the real reason why r-t-l doesn't work for you?
Probably not. This one better? Still no r-t-l here.
--
Steve C. Lamb
On 01/06/09 05:06, Micha Feigin wrote:
[snip]
I also like to process my mail with fetchmail/procmail and store it in a Mail
directory in mh format, something that thunderbird and evolution don't
support, don't know about kmail (I don't use kde apps, they spawn too many
Have procmail drop it in
On 01/06/09 03:06, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
You've got to be doing something wrong...
Installed Thunderbird, installed Enigmail, downloaded reply-to-list, both
versions, installed them, neither work. Can't mess than up Ron, even for me.
My User-Agent string is a lot more "ri
On Tue January 6 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I am using "mutt" since 9 years now and currently I have open four XTerm
> running "mutt". There is nothing which does not work on it.
>
> Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
I used pine 20 years ago, but I don't think I've ever tried mutt. star
Am 2009-01-05 20:33:09, schrieb Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.:
> Does it work outside of a terminal, yet? :) Seriously though, mutt *is* a
> very high-quality MUA. Even if you normally prefer X applications, mutt
> is worth a look.
I am using "mutt" since 9 years now and currently I have open four X
Am 2009-01-05 18:13:32, schrieb hose:
> Just use the least sucky client out there (mutt). It has sane reply,
> reply-to, and reply-to-list commands, is extremely fast, and can bend
> to your will if needed, no matter how wrong you are. It's the vim of
> the email world.
I even know some Wi
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:27:44 -0800
Ken Teague wrote:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail
> > replies to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually,
> > appears to be a violation on the relevant standards. :P)
Ron Johnson wrote:
> You've got to be doing something wrong...
Installed Thunderbird, installed Enigmail, downloaded reply-to-list, both
versions, installed them, neither work. Can't mess than up Ron, even for me.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
(Apologies to Boyd, been a while since I replied to D-U, got out of the habit
of reply-to-all and trim. ;)
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail replies
> to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually, appears to
On 01/06/09 02:46, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Install the Reply To List add-on, v0.2.1 or v0.3.0, depending on whether
you access IMAP or not. Works perfectly.
For you... Still not working here. :P
You've got to be doing something wrong...
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Install the Reply To List add-on, v0.2.1 or v0.3.0, depending on whether
> you access IMAP or not. Works perfectly.
For you... Still not working here. :P
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ken Teague wrote:
> Is Kmail available for Win32? I'm at work on my laptop and don't have
> the luxury of Linux all day.
http://windows.kde.org/
> I also stated in my previous post that the reply-to field was missing
> from the SMTP header. I can manually add it from my MUA (as I did with
> thi
On 01/05/09 17:27, Ken Teague wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail replies
to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually, appears to
be a violation on the relevant standards. :P)
Is Kmail available for Wi
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:33:09 -0600
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
...
> Does it work outside of a terminal, yet? :) Seriously though, mutt *is* a
> very high-quality MUA. Even if you normally prefer X applications, mutt
> is worth a look.
Although I have only dabbled with Mutt, from the li
On Monday 05 January 2009, hose wrote
about 'Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to,
reply':
>On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Celejar wrote:
>> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:27:44 -0800
>> Ken Teague wrote:
>>> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:27:44 -0800
Ken Teague wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;)
Kmail replies
to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually,
appears to
be a vi
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:27:44 -0800
Ken Teague wrote:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail
> > replies
> > to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually, appears
> > to
> > be a violation on the relevant sta
On Monday 2009 January 05 17:27:44 Ken Teague wrote:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail
> > replies to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually,
> > appears to be a violation on the relevant standards. :P)
>
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail replies
> to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually, appears to
> be a violation on the relevant standards. :P)
Is Kmail available for Win32? I'm at work on my laptop and
On Monday 2009 January 05 16:20:14 Moderation Robot wrote:
> From: Ken Teague <"kteague at pobox dot com"@giganews.com>
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > I believe the (quite valid) suggestion to ditch Gmail is because it
> > does not have a 'reply to list function'. Well, there are several
> > oth
linux.debian.user is a moderated newsgroup in gateway
with a mailing list.
Your article has been examined by the automatic moderation program
and has been refused because:
this hierarchy accepts posts only from registered users.
You can register for posting by subscribing to the linux-g...@lists.
55 matches
Mail list logo
