On Monday 05 January 2009, hose <subscripti...@bluemaggottowel.com> wrote about 'Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply': >On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Celejar wrote: >> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:27:44 -0800 >> Ken Teague <ktea...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >>>> See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) >Just use the least sucky client out there (mutt). It has sane reply, >reply-to, and reply-to-list commands, is extremely fast, and can bend >to your will if needed, no matter how wrong you are. It's the vim of >the email world.
Does it work outside of a terminal, yet? :) Seriously though, mutt *is* a very high-quality MUA. Even if you normally prefer X applications, mutt is worth a look. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
