On 19 March 2010 00:19, Cassiano Leal wrote:
> On 17 March 2010 15:24, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> On Wed,17.Mar.10, 11:27:19, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
>>> Hi Andrei,
>>>
>>> OK, doing
>>>
>>> modprobe -r radeon
>>> modprobe radeon modeset=1
>>>
>>> using 2.6.32-3-amd64 results in a working machine
On 17 March 2010 15:24, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed,17.Mar.10, 11:27:19, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
>> Hi Andrei,
>>
>> OK, doing
>>
>> modprobe -r radeon
>> modprobe radeon modeset=1
>>
>> using 2.6.32-3-amd64 results in a working machine which actually
>> performance workplace and application s
On Wed,17.Mar.10, 11:27:19, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> OK, doing
>
> modprobe -r radeon
> modprobe radeon modeset=1
>
> using 2.6.32-3-amd64 results in a working machine which actually
> performance workplace and application switching at acceptable speed.
Are you sure the mod
Hi,
Thanks for the response.
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:04 -0300, Cassiano Leal wrote:
> > (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed because of a version
> > mismatch.
> > [dri] radeon kernel module version is 2.0.0 but version 1.17.0 or newer is
> > needed.
> > [dri] Disabling DRI.
>
>
Hi
On 17 March 2010 07:27, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> OK, doing
>
> modprobe -r radeon
> modprobe radeon modeset=1
>
> using 2.6.32-3-amd64 results in a working machine which actually
> performance workplace and application switching at acceptable speed.
>
> Now I just have 1 error
Hi Andrei,
OK, doing
modprobe -r radeon
modprobe radeon modeset=1
using 2.6.32-3-amd64 results in a working machine which actually
performance workplace and application switching at acceptable speed.
Now I just have 1 error left in my XOrg.log:
(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion fail
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 11:34 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed,17.Mar.10, 09:53:07, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> > Hi Andrei,
> >
> > Nop, not even a failure.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:45 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > grep -i firmware /var/log/syslog
> >
> > panoramix:/home/jk
On Wed,17.Mar.10, 09:53:07, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Nop, not even a failure.
>
>
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:45 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > grep -i firmware /var/log/syslog
>
> panoramix:/home/jkr# grep -i firmware /var/log/syslog
> Mar 17 08:18:28 panoramix kernel: [ 12
Hi Andrei,
Nop, not even a failure.
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:45 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> grep -i firmware /var/log/syslog
panoramix:/home/jkr# grep -i firmware /var/log/syslog
Mar 17 08:18:28 panoramix kernel: [ 12.304016] 3w-9xxx: scsi4: Firmware FE9X
2.08.00.006, BIOS BE9X 2.03.01.05
On Wed,17.Mar.10, 09:11:31, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> 1. In several postings I saw the mentioning of the need to load
> firmware. I have installed all the firmware-linux packages, including
> the non-free which contains the relevant Radeon firmware. I see some
> firmware getting loaded (eg for m
Hi,
I am struggling with my Radeon HD 3850 / RV670 AGP ever since I have
upgraded to XOrg 7.5 which is (still) not supported by the proprietary
driver. The OSS Radeon driver is *really* slow. Switching between
workplaces or (full screen) applications sometimes take more than 30
seconds. More appli
11 matches
Mail list logo
