If you set the netmask for all the aliases (eth0:0 etc.) to
255.255.255.255, do you get the result you want?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f106590
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:23:30AM +, Darac Marjal wrote:
> There are a number of long-standing bugs raised against ifupdown
> (#168776, #464562 and #496591) which relate to this.
ifupdown now has an active maintainer, and I'm sure patches
would be welcome.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roge
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 03:48:56PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > Bob Proulx a écrit :
>
[cut]
> Eventually when ifupdown has migrated it will be doing vitually the
> same thing as the above. It will simply be doing it internally.
> Previous versions of 'ifupdown' called if
Bob Proulx a écrit :
> Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>> Bob Proulx a écrit :
>
>>> up ip addr add 10.25.48.141/24 dev eth0 label eth0:0
>>> down ip addr del 10.25.48.141/24 dev eth0 label eth0:0
>>
>> That sucks big time. Don't tell me it is the new official way to replace
>> aliases.
>
> It d
> Pings from the same subnet work for all of the interfaces/ip addresses
> Pings from other subnets only work for the primary interface/address.
Do you have a firewall blocking ping (aka ICMP echo-request)? Sounds
like a firewall problem.
Are you talking about outgoing pings or incoming pings?
@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: virtual interfaces not routing properly.
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Bob Proulx a écrit :
> > Instead I prefer setting up the dependent aliased virtual interfaces
>
> Please don't call ethX:Y virtual interfaces. They are not interfaces.
> Only ifconfig arti
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Bob Proulx a écrit :
> > Instead I prefer setting up the dependent aliased virtual interfaces
>
> Please don't call ethX:Y virtual interfaces. They are not interfaces.
> Only ifconfig artificially treats them as interfaces. They cannot be
> used as interfaces by other tool
Hello,
Bob Proulx a écrit :
>
> Instead I prefer setting up the dependent aliased virtual interfaces
Please don't call ethX:Y virtual interfaces. They are not interfaces.
Only ifconfig artificially treats them as interfaces. They cannot be
used as interfaces by other tools nor by the kernel.
>
Gareth Walters (2K Australia) wrote:
> But its not working out side the same subnet (i.e. routing is wrong)
What is wrong about it? Can you show the routing table and identify
what is incorrect? Since you don't show the problem there isn't a way
to guess.
> /etc/network/interfaces
> auto lo et
On 12/01/12 14:12, Gareth Walters (2K Australia) wrote:
> G'day all,
> I need some help..
>
> I am trying to get Squeeze ( 6.0.3 AMD64) to have a few virtual
> interfaces so I can setup some SSL sites in apache.
> But its not working out side the same subnet (i.e. routing is wrong)
> I have tried
10 matches
Mail list logo
