On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:45:57AM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
| According to my ADSL service provider, my connection to their gateway
| is somehow "private",
This is mostly marketing-speak and quite meaningless. They are
comparing their service with that of cable modems. Cable modems use
some
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:45:57AM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> I have this setup at home. The box with the public IP has a firewall.
> According to my ADSL service provider, my connection to their gateway
> is somehow "private", but I haven't really tested with tcpdump if all
> incomming packets a
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:24:27PM -0500, Mike wrote:
> It breaks all kinds of rules concerning security and clean network
> design, but it should work.
>
> As an example of unintended problems, if you have DHCP setup on either
> interface of the Linux box it could serve invalid addresses to oth
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Mike wrote:
> As an example of unintended problems, if you have DHCP setup on either
> interface of the Linux box it could serve invalid addresses to other
> folks at your ISP.
Depends on the ISP's setup, too. @Home before they died thier
undeserved death by collusion, used
It breaks all kinds of rules concerning security and clean network
design, but it should work.
As an example of unintended problems, if you have DHCP setup on either
interface of the Linux box it could serve invalid addresses to other
folks at your ISP.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: st
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, stonelx wrote:
> To setup a linux box with 2 nics.
> One with a public IP and the other with a private IP.
> The linux box is acting as a masqurading box. (ipmasq)
> However, both nics are plugged into the same switch or hub.
Yes![1] If you really want to do just NAT without
6 matches
Mail list logo
