-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 10:50:47AM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hi Tomás,
>
> many thanks for your response :-)
[...]
> retry temporary address regeneration
> Apr 21 10:36:01 master kernel: [3019221.240105] IPv6: ipv6_create_tempaddr:
[...]
> Al
Hi Tomás,
many thanks for your response :-)
Am Samstag, 21. April 2018, 08:43:20 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 20. April 2018, 22:13:11 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
> > > curl -I http://security.debian.org/debian-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Am Freitag, 20. April 2018, 22:13:11 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
> > curl -I http://security.debian.org/debian-security/
>
> root@master:~/tmp# curl -I http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian
Hi,
I just realized sometimes it also shows in apt-get upgrade:
[...]
Setting up libreoffice-writer (1:5.2.7-1+deb9u4) ...
Setting up libreoffice-base (1:5.2.7-1+deb9u4) ...
Setting up libreoffice-report-builder-bin (1:5.2.7-1+deb9u4) ...
Setting up libreoffice-report-builder (1:5.2.7-1+deb9u4) .
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 22:20:12 +0200
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> root@master:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
(...)
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates main
> contrib non-free
> deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates main
> contrib non-free
her
Am Freitag, 20. April 2018, 22:13:11 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
> curl -I http://security.debian.org/debian-security/
root@master:~/tmp# curl -I http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 20:19:14 GMT
Server: Apache/2.4.10 (Debian)
Content-Type: text/html;charset=U
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:02:40PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see often the error:
> Error: Timeout was reached
> during an apt-get update.
[...]
> Hit:2 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian stretch Release
>
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:27:15AM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> > On 08/12/15 13:41, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >
> >> *groan* *sigh* ... I wonder why there's not a 'dpkg
> >> --print-architectures' which prints out *all* the architec
At face value I'd assumed Tony was reflecting on the freedom a user has to
make something work how they want.
I didn't consider it as demanding, because unless he had offered to create
the features or rally the developers himself or point the OP to another
list, and assuming Tony wasn't overwhelme
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 08/12/15 13:41, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
>> *groan* *sigh* ... I wonder why there's not a 'dpkg
>> --print-architectures' which prints out *all* the architectures it knows
>> about.
>>
> Because you haven't written it yet?
>
IMHO this
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 01:47:19PM +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 08/12/15 13:41, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> >*groan* *sigh* ... I wonder why there's not a 'dpkg
> >--print-architectures' which prints out *all* the architectures it knows
> >about.
> >
> Because you haven't written it yet?
N
On 08/12/15 13:41, Chris Bannister wrote:
*groan* *sigh* ... I wonder why there's not a 'dpkg
--print-architectures' which prints out *all* the architectures it knows
about.
Because you haven't written it yet?
--
Tony van der Hoff| mailto:t...@vanderhoff.org
Buckinghamshire, England |
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:48:45AM +0100, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> Am 06.12.2015 um 22:47 schrieb Klaus Jantzen:
> > dpkg --remove-architecture i368
> > apt-get update
> >
> > But I cannot add the correct architecture:
> >
> > dpkg --add-architecture i386
> > apt-get update
> > dpkg --print-
Am 06.12.2015 um 22:47 schrieb Klaus Jantzen:
> On 12/05/2015 08:56 PM, Myscelus wrote:
>> On 12/05/2015 08:55 PM, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> due to a typing error - I wanted to say 'dpkg --add-architecture i386'
>>> but wrote 'i368' -
>>> I get the following error messages when running a
On 12/05/2015 08:56 PM, Myscelus wrote:
> On 12/05/2015 08:55 PM, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> due to a typing error - I wanted to say 'dpkg --add-architecture i386'
>> but wrote 'i368' -
>> I get the following error messages when running apt-get update:
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> W: Failed to fetch
> Hi,
>
> due to a typing error - I wanted to say 'dpkg --add-architecture i386'
> but wrote 'i368' -
> I get the following error messages when running apt-get update:
>
>
> ...
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/dists/vivid/Release
> Unable to find expected
On 12/05/2015 08:55 PM, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
Hi,
due to a typing error - I wanted to say 'dpkg --add-architecture i386'
but wrote 'i368' -
I get the following error messages when running apt-get update:
...
W: Failed to fetch
http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/dists/vivid/Releas
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 07:54:18PM +0800, Gero Putzar
was heard to say:
> So "A: Breaks: B" is meant to read as "A would break B if it was going to be
> installed". I interpreted the "Breaks:" as "does not comply with the need
> for the following dependency".
That message just lists the depend
On Sat,05.Sep.09, 19:54:18, Gero Putzar wrote:
>
> I tried to install the package "shutter" from testing on my stable distro. I
> included the testing repositories in the apt-sources list and set
> APT::Default-Release "lenny";
Be careful with that, due to a long-standing bug in apt codenames are
On 2009-09-05 06:54, Gero Putzar wrote:
Thank you very much for your help!
@ Brian:
So "A: Breaks: B" is meant to read as "A would break B if it was going to be
installed". I interpreted the "Breaks:" as "does not comply with the need
for the following dependency".
Well, I'm not a native spea
Thank you very much for your help!
@ Brian:
So "A: Breaks: B" is meant to read as "A would break B if it was going to be
installed". I interpreted the "Breaks:" as "does not comply with the need
for the following dependency".
Well, I'm not a native speaker. So maybe I should not complain about
On 2009-09-04 23:03, Gero Putzar wrote:
Hi,
I get the following error message from apt-get:
---snip---
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc6-i386: Breaks: lib32asound2 (<= 1.0.20-2) but 1.0.16-2 is to be
installed
Breaks: lib32gcc1 (<= 1:4.4.0-6) but 1:4.3.2-1.1
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:03:37PM +0800, Gero Putzar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get the following error message from apt-get:
>
> ---snip---
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libc6-i386: Breaks: lib32asound2 (<= 1.0.20-2) but 1.0.16-2 is to be
> installed
> Breaks: lib3
Sorry, but I haven´t read the problem. What did happend?
Kind regards.
2007/5/30, disguise_account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
i am stuck with the same problem ... please tell me how did u solved it
.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 18:38, Nikhil Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm getting following errors after "apt-get upgrade".I'm using Sarge
> 3.1 and tried to upgrade after adding testing & unstable repositories
> to my source.lst file.All packages were successfully downloaded.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why
Well, maybe you could copy the error in your email? Provide information
about your system (is it woody/stable sarge/nearly-stable ??) and such ?
Joris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why
Nick Smith said:
> can someone tell me what to do to get rid of this error message:
>
> dpkg: error processing sslwrap (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> sslwrap
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 08:51:44AM -0500, Jeff Self said
> I tried building a kernel 2.6.0 last week using make-kpkg. When I run
> dpkg -i kernel-image-2.6.0_10.00.Custom_i386.deb I get the following
> message:
> dpkg: serious warning: files list file for package `kernel-image-2.6.0'
> missing, ass
Try
apt-get -f install
and see if it fixes the problem.
> -Original Message-
> From: Karsten M. Self [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 November 2003 12:33
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Apt-get error with package diff
>
>
> on Mon, Oct 27,
on Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:01:05PM +0100, Juan Pablo Valenzuela ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hello:
> my pc frezze in a middle of a dist-upgrade so i must to restart. Now the
> apt-get doesn't work anymore... this is the message:
>
> # apt-get install diff
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Buildi
Hi. A couple of comments.
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:59:46 -0700
Wm.G.McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In
> order to conduct a useful search you have to understand and define
> the problem correctly.
Actually, not necessarily. When it comes to computer error messages,
I've successfully dealt
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:29:56 -0400
Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:In general, when you've got a question, it's a good idea to try
::doing a simple web search, or search of this mailing list's
::archives. In particular, your question gets asked pretty
::frequently.
::See http://www.debia
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 01:43:02 -0700
Wm.G.McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> What's the problem here?
In general, when you've got a question, it's a good idea to try doing
a simple web search, or search of this mailing list's archives. In
particular, your question gets asked pretty frequent
Hi there!
Wm.G.McGrath wrote:
> [...]
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
> E: Error occured while processing pentium-builder (NewVersion1)
> E: Problem with MergeList
> /var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_testing_main_binary
> -i386_Packages
>
> E: The package lists or status file coul
Hello
Wm.G.McGrath wrote:
> What's the problem here?
> Failed to fetch cdrom:['Libranet GNU/Linux 1.9
> CD1']/archive/Packages Please use apt-cdrom to make this CD
> recognized by APT. apt-get update cannot be used to add new CDs
> Reading Package Lists...
>
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
>
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 09:31:15AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> Today I noticed a starnge (to me) behaviour of apt-get. I am running a
> predominantly sarge system with the latest xpdf installed. For some
> reason I downloaded the deb sources of the same and installed it.
>
> But, when I do an ap
On 6 Jun 2003 Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 13:05, Ben Kal wrote:
>> On 4 Jun 2003 Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > When I 'apt-get install' a package I have been getting the following error
>> > message:
>> >
>> > Retrieving bug reports... Done
>> >
On 4 Jun 2003 Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I 'apt-get install' a package I have been getting the following error
> message:
>
> Retrieving bug reports... Done
> dpkg-deb: wait for tar failed: No child processes Traceback (most recent
> call last):
> File "/usr/bin/apt-listchang
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 13:05, Ben Kal wrote:
> On 4 Jun 2003 Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > When I 'apt-get install' a package I have been getting the following error
> > message:
> >
> > Retrieving bug reports... Done
> > dpkg-deb: wait for tar failed: No child processes Traceback (
I'm not really sure, but I suppose that the default cache size used by
apt became small for the amount of packages got by apt-get update. So
the line below increased the cache size and allowed apt to work
correctly again, for the cache available space now is enough. Some on
the list could confirm i
thank you!!! that did it. so what exactly was the problem?
why/where/how did apt run out of room??
saved my butt, I really appreciate it!
m
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 03:17:35PM -0500, Bruno Diniz de Paula wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> try adding 'APT::Cache-Limit 25165824;' to your /etc/apt/apt.conf fil
Hi Matt,
try adding 'APT::Cache-Limit 25165824;' to your /etc/apt/apt.conf file.
Cheers,
Bruno.
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 15:13, Matt Price wrote:
> hi,
>
> can someone parse this error for me? Got it while trying apt-get update:
>
>
> Reading Package Lists... Error!
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of
On Friday 20 December 2002 03:25, Russ Cook wrote:
> I saw a similar message topic back in October, with no solution posted.
> I now have two computers exhibiting this problem when using apt-get.
> Does anyone know a solution?
>
> Thanks,
> Russ
Googling would've given you the answer. Try s
Extracted from: http://katspace.net/computers/linux_tips.txt
"This happened because Debian is so big now, that once I started listing
multiple sources, it couldn't cope with them all with its default
settings for its Dynamic MMap (which stands for Dynamic Memory Map I
think). The way this gets fix
On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 04:05, shock wrote:
>
> any ideas on what i need to do to get this corrected?
Have a look at the debian bug pages, there is some info there I think.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=libgnomeprint-data&repeatmerged=yes
> --
> ) ,_),_)
> (-(__
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 06:45:53PM +0300, Rodolf Sarimanok wrote:
> Hello all, I have a little problem but I can't resolve it.
> When I try to install or deinstall "ed" it marks
>
> (Reading database ... 22003 files and directories currently installed.)
> Removing ed ...
> update-alternatives: una
Colin Watson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 01:31:52PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > Eileen Orbell([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > > It looks like my problem lies pretty deep because
> > > #which ldconfig
> > > returns nothing and a search al
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Eileen Orbell wrote:
>
> It looks like my problem lies pretty deep because
> #which ldconfig
> returns nothing and a search also turns up empty. Is it time to
> reinstall?
# locate ldconfig | grep bin
/sbin/ldconfig
then edit your .bashrc (or whatever you're using) and add
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 01:31:52PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> Eileen Orbell([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > It looks like my problem lies pretty deep because
> > #which ldconfig
> > returns nothing and a search also turns up empty. Is it time to
> > reinstall?
>
> First make sur
Eileen Orbell([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
>
>
> It looks like my problem lies pretty deep because
> #which ldconfig
> returns nothing and a search also turns up empty. Is it time to
> reinstall?
>
> Thanks
>
First make sure that /usr/sbin is in your root's PATH. If not then
Subject: Re: apt-get error
is ldconfig in your path? try something like:
# which ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig
# env | grep :/sbin:
and see if it's in your path.
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Eileen Orbell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to issue the command apt-get upgrade. The errors I
recei
is ldconfig in your path? try something like:
# which ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig
# env | grep :/sbin:
and see if it's in your path.
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Eileen Orbell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to issue the command apt-get upgrade. The errors I receive
> are
> You have unmet dependencies:
> T
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I get this error after an "apt-get install kdebase-crypto"...
>Package kdebase-crypto has no available version, but exists in the database.
>This typically means that the package was mentioned in a dependency and
>never uploaded, has been obsoleted or is not available with
> "kmself" == kmself writes:
kmself> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 02:34:33PM -0500, Pascal Hos
kmself> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Since yesterday I keep getting the following error when running
>> apt-get upgrade:
>>
>> Fetched 9272kB in 1m19s (117kB/s) 11% [Scanning
Subject: apt-get error when updating
Date: Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 07:22:12PM +0200
In reply to:Willi Dyck
Quoting Willi Dyck([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello!
>
> i'm getting this error msg when doing an apt-get update. i want to
> update from 2.1 to 2.2.
>
> W: Couldn't stat source p
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 02:34:33PM -0500, Pascal Hos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Since yesterday I keep getting the following error when running apt-get
> upgrade:
>
> Fetched 9272kB in 1m19s (117kB/s)
>
> Well apt-get upgrade did never finish OK. It started out more or less ok,
> but after a while it could not properly configure some packages
> (gimp-manual and libpaperg (here it never accepted any paper format like
> a4 and there was no list to choose from; therefore forcing a ctrl+c and
> ther
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 07:35:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well apt-get upgrade did never finish OK. It started out more or less ok,
> but after a while it could not properly configure some packages
> (gimp-manual and libpaperg (here it never accepted any paper format like
> a4 and there
Hi !
Well apt-get upgrade did never finish OK. It started out more or less ok,
but after a while it could not properly configure some packages
(gimp-manual and libpaperg (here it never accepted any paper format like
a4 and there was no list to choose from; therefore forcing a ctrl+c and
thereby ab
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I did apt-get --fix-broken --show-upgrade dist-upgrade, I got the
> info about what apt wanted to remove, install and update. Then it asked
Hm. You have more packages installed than I have ever seen.. This is a bug
- can you please send me a co
> (snipped)
> > I'm trying to upgrade from slink to the latest unstable using apt-get
> > dist-upgrade, and
> > after a 180MB download (14 hours!) I got this error message:
> >
> > "E: Internal Error, Couldn't configure a pre-depend."
> >
> > What does this mean, and how can I fix it (or better yet
That file was pulled off the mirrors due to a bug in it. Just run
"apt-get update" and get a new Packages.gz file...
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Pollywog wrote:
> I am getting the following error when I do 'apt-get upgrade':
>
> Err
> http://http.us.debian.org potato/main makedev 2.3.1-27
> 404 Not F
On 03-Aug-99 Bob Nielsen wrote:
> That version of makedev did some bad things, like possibly wipe out your
> /dev directory and was removed (it fortunately wouldn't install for me,
> but some folks weren't that lucky).
>
> Did you try 'apt-get --fix-missing' as suggested? It should allow the
>
That version of makedev did some bad things, like possibly wipe out your
/dev directory and was removed (it fortunately wouldn't install for me,
but some folks weren't that lucky).
Did you try 'apt-get --fix-missing' as suggested? It should allow the
other packages to get installed. The new ve
"Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jason> It's quite amazing that these days the archive has been so
Jason> consistent that people have forgotten that option ;>
And I bet that you really didn't want that missing file anyway. :)
netgod
* Cyberlink wants t
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Pollywog wrote:
> I cannot install any packages because of this one missing package on the
> Debian archives. Any way around installing each package I downloaded
> manually?
Use -m
It's quite amazing that these days the archive has been so consistent that
people have forgo
67 matches
Mail list logo
