Re: Threading (was: QCAD Pro in Squeeze)

2011-06-22 Thread Alberto Luaces
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI writes: > On Ter, 21 Jun 2011, Alberto Luaces wrote: >> Camaleón writes: >> But at least you did not reply to a digest. >>> >>> Sure. I'd say digests are for reading more than replying. >> >> In addition, there are some MUAs that can extract individual messages >> from di

Re: Threading (was: QCAD Pro in Squeeze)

2011-06-21 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
On Ter, 21 Jun 2011, Alberto Luaces wrote: Camaleón writes: But at least you did not reply to a digest. Sure. I'd say digests are for reading more than replying. In addition, there are some MUAs that can extract individual messages from digests. Emacs gnus does this. But does it set prope

Re: Threading (was: QCAD Pro in Squeeze)

2011-06-21 Thread Alberto Luaces
Camaleón writes: >> But at least you did not reply to a digest. > > Sure. I'd say digests are for reading more than replying. In addition, there are some MUAs that can extract individual messages from digests. Emacs gnus does this. -- Alberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@l

Re: QCAD Pro in Squeeze

2011-06-21 Thread Preston Boyington
Camaleón wrote: On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 10:45:33 -0800, peasthope wrote: RibbonSoft notes that QCAD Pro worked in Debian 3.1 and 4.0. Is anyone using it in 6, Squeeze? I'm wondering whether to stick with Generic CADD 6.1 purchased years ago or switch to QCAD Pro 2.2. Recommendations appreciated.

Re: QCAD Pro in Squeeze

2011-06-21 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 10:45:33 -0800, peasthope wrote: > RibbonSoft notes that QCAD Pro worked in Debian 3.1 and 4.0. Is anyone > using it in 6, Squeeze? I'm wondering whether to stick with Generic > CADD 6.1 purchased years ago or switch to QCAD Pro 2.2. Recommendations > appreciated. JFYI, for

Re: Threading (was: QCAD Pro in Squeeze)

2011-06-21 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:21:01 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > On Seg, 20 Jun 2011, wrote: >> [To see how it works, I've tried to include all the References in the >> header in this message. If Chuck or Lee complains I'll know there's an >> error. ] > > This message broke the thread. It has

Re: Threading (was: QCAD Pro in Squeeze)

2011-06-21 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
On Seg, 20 Jun 2011, wrote: [To see how it works, I've tried to include all the References in the header in this message. If Chuck or Lee complains I'll know there's an error. ] This message broke the thread. It has not References or In-Reply-To headers. As someone said, your MUA should do t

Re (4): QCAD Pro in Squeeze

2011-06-20 Thread peasthope
From: kuLa Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:17:27 +0100 > if you're going to buy something have a look at this > http://www.bricscad.com/ > but I guess difference in price is significant Certainly appealing but too expensive for my needs and budget. [To see how it works, I've tried to include all t

Re: message threading; was Re (3): QCAD Pro in Squeeze

2011-06-20 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:15:57 -0800, peasthope wrote: >> Would you please fix your mail client so you stop breaking the list >> threading? > > Usually I manage to set In-reply-to to the Message-id of the message > being replied to. In the Web archive, the Follow-Ups and References > seem OK. Can

Re: Re (2): QCAD Pro in Squeeze

2011-06-19 Thread kuLa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20/06/11 00:25, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: > * From: Joe > * Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:13:35 +0100 >> Yes, I assumed you needed the paid-for version, ... > > Yes; I contemplate buying QCAD Pro to get the features > not available in the comm

Re (2): message threading; was Re (3): QCAD Pro in Squeeze

2011-06-19 Thread peasthope
new > thread. Yes, I intended to start a new thread on "message threading". Hence the subject "message threading; was Re (3): QCAD Pro in Squeeze". Thanks, ... Peter E. -- Telephone 1 360 450 2132. bcc: peasthope at shaw.ca Shop pages http://car

Re: message threading; was Re (3): QCAD Pro in Squeeze

2011-06-19 Thread Ron Johnson
On 06/19/2011 06:15 PM, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: From a private message; From: C P Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:30:55 -0400 Would you please fix your mail client so you stop breaking the list threading? Usually I manage to set In-reply-to to the Message-id of the message being replied to. I

Re: message threading; was Re (3): QCAD Pro in Squeeze

2011-06-19 Thread lee
peasth...@shaw.ca writes: >>From a private message; > From: C P > Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:30:55 -0400 >> Would you please fix your mail client so you stop breaking the list >> threading? > > Usually I manage to set In-reply-to to the Message-id of the message > being replied to. In the Web arc

Re (2): QCAD Pro in Squeeze

2011-06-19 Thread peasthope
* From: Joe * Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:13:35 +0100 > Yes, I assumed you needed the paid-for version, ... Yes; I contemplate buying QCAD Pro to get the features not available in the community version. > ... otherwise you would be using the free one already. The free version for S

message threading; was Re (3): QCAD Pro in Squeeze

2011-06-19 Thread peasthope
>From a private message; From: C P Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:30:55 -0400 > Would you please fix your mail client so you stop breaking the list > threading? Usually I manage to set In-reply-to to the Message-id of the message being replied to. In the Web archive, the Follow-Ups and References

Re: Re (2): QCAD Pro in Squeeze

2011-06-19 Thread Joe
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 12:52:19 -0800 peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: > From: Joe > Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:05:19 +0100 > > I don't know how big the differences are, but I'm using 2.0.5 Free > > in Sid, and have been using the Sid version for about four years. > > It's not completely bug-free, but it see

Re (2): QCAD Pro in Squeeze

2011-06-19 Thread peasthope
From: Joe Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:05:19 +0100 > I don't know how big the differences are, but I'm using 2.0.5 Free in > Sid, and have been using the Sid version for about four years. It's not > completely bug-free, but it seems to have the same bugs in a couple of > Ubuntus, and fewer now th

Re: QCAD Pro in Squeeze

2011-06-19 Thread Joe
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 10:45:33 -0800 peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: > RibbonSoft notes that QCAD Pro worked in Debian 3.1 and 4.0. > Is anyone using it in 6, Squeeze? I'm wondering whether to > stick with Generic CADD 6.1 purchased years ago or switch to > QCAD Pro 2.2. Recommendations appreciated.

QCAD Pro in Squeeze

2011-06-19 Thread peasthope
RibbonSoft notes that QCAD Pro worked in Debian 3.1 and 4.0. Is anyone using it in 6, Squeeze? I'm wondering whether to stick with Generic CADD 6.1 purchased years ago or switch to QCAD Pro 2.2. Recommendations appreciated. Thanks, ... Peter E. -- Telephone 1 360 450 213