Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:53:05AM +0100, Erik Jakobsen wrote:
Ok very nice.
What, where do I have to look ?
google?
snip...
Tanks.
yes. please learn to use the search tools: aptitide search
or apt-cache search .
I will, and many thanks. M
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:53:05AM +0100, Erik Jakobsen wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > Sometime ago Erik wrote:
> > > I want to install the PWC software for my Logitech Webcam Pro 4000
> > > I got the code from here:
> > >
> > > http://www.saillard.org/linux/pwc/files/
> > >
> > > An
> I want to install the PWC software for my Logitech Webcam Pro 4000
> I got the code from here:
>
> http://www.saillard.org/linux/pwc/files/
>
> And i tried form ther pwc-10.0.11.tar.bz2
well there is now a 10.0.12-rc1 out so you might look into that.
Ok very nice.
What, where do I have to l
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 07:08:22PM +0100, Erik Jakobsen wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > we really sort of need more details about this, like what camera, what
> > are you trying to build, where you got the code, etc etc etc.
> >
> >
> >
> > just what it says here. I suspect that this i
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> we really sort of need more details about this, like what camera, what
> are you trying to build, where you got the code, etc etc etc.
>
>
>
> just what it says here. I suspect that this is causing most of the
> rest of these errors. It almost looks like there's a
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:54:27AM +0100, Erik Jakobsen wrote:
> I am trying to install a webcam on my etch dist.
we really sort of need more details about this, like what camera, what
are you trying to build, where you got the code, etc etc etc.
>
> I get this:
>
> # make
> make -C /lib/modules/
I am trying to install a webcam on my etch dist.
I get this:
# make
make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-5-486/build SUBDIRS=/opt/pwc-10.0.11 modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.18-5-486'
CC [M] /opt/pwc-10.0.11/pwc-if.o
/opt/pwc-10.0.11/pwc-if.c:164: error: variable ‘pwc_temp
On Wed, 9 May 2007 15:32:08 -0400, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 08 May 2007 17:29:38 -0500
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hmm. I should amend that to say: Step 5 does require (fake)root
>> privileges.
> Huh? Here's a longer excerpt:
Oops. I think I mis
On Tue, 08 May 2007 17:29:38 -0500
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:11:54 -0400, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Tue, 08 May 2007 12:47:28 -0500
> > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele More
Manoj--thanks for a real nice trick with the "dpkg-deb --contents"--I had no
idea this would output the default file modes, owners, etc! Now I'm just wondering if
dpkg can reinstall dpkg (reinstall itself?), to get back to that happy like-new state?
After that, I'll be looking for the culpri
On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:11:54 -0400, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 08 May 2007 12:47:28 -0500
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele Morelli
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > That's ok, I follow the general (healthy) rule and
On Tue, 8 May 2007 20:50:13 +0200 (CEST), pizzapie linuxanchovies <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
> Thanks to everyone who replied with ideas about my post. Let me give
> quick replies to the questions you asked me:
> Manoj--yes, dpkg is in /usr/bin, and is in the user's path, but no
> normal user
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 08:50:13PM +0200, pizzapie_linuxanchovies wrote:
>
>
> Andrew (and anyone else who can do a make-kpkg under a non-root
> account)--what permissions do YOU see when you say ls -l /usr/bin/root?
I was referring to the general case of compiling source as a user and
installi
On Tue, 08 May 2007 12:47:28 -0500
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele Morelli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > That's ok, I follow the general (healthy) rule and do not log as root
> > if unnecessary, but for kernel (and program) compile I
Thanks to everyone who replied with ideas about my post. Let me give quick
replies to the questions you asked me:
Manoj--yes, dpkg is in /usr/bin, and is in the user's path, but no normal user
has execute access to dpkg:
$ ls -l /usr/bin/dpkg
-rwxr-x--- 1 root root 174040 May 26 2005 /usr/b
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> 2007/5/8, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:12:22 +0200
> >"Raffaele Morelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >[snip]
> >
> >> Me too compile kernels as root and really would like to know why it is
> >> con
On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele Morelli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> That's ok, I follow the general (healthy) rule and do not log as root
> if unnecessary, but for kernel (and program) compile I can not picture
> 'make-kpkg' or 'configure && make' doing something regrettable.
2007/5/8, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:12:22 +0200
"Raffaele Morelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Me too compile kernels as root and really would like to know why it is
> considered such a bad habit.
It's generally considered a bad idea to do anything as root unl
On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:12:22 +0200
"Raffaele Morelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Me too compile kernels as root and really would like to know why it is
> considered such a bad habit.
It's generally considered a bad idea to do anything as root unless it's
absolutely necessary. I suppose i
Raffaele Morelli wrote:
I just changed:
1. Processor type and features -> Paravirtualization support
(EXPERIMENTAL) OFF
2. Processor type and features -> Timer frequency (1000 HZ)
3. Processor type and features -> Preemption Model (Preemptible Kernel
(Low-Latency Desktop)
I just changed:
1. Processor type and features -> Paravirtualization support
(EXPERIMENTAL) OFF
2. Processor type and features -> Timer frequency (1000 HZ)
3. Processor type and features -> Preemption Model (Preemptible Kernel
(Low-Latency Desktop))
4. Device Drivers -> Graphics support -> Logo
pizzapie_linuxanchovies wrote:
I was following a tutorial
(http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for compiling
a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run this:
"fakeroot make-kpkg clean"
However, this command generated a bunch of errors saying this:
dpkg-a
pizzapie_linuxanchovies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was following a tutorial
> (http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for
> compiling a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run
> this: "fakeroot make-kpkg clean"
>
> However, this command generated a bunch of
On Tue, 8 May 2007 05:37:58 +0200 (CEST), pizzapie linuxanchovies
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I was following a tutorial
> (http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for
> compiling a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run
> this: "fakeroot make-kpkg clean" Howe
I was following a tutorial (http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for
compiling a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run this: "fakeroot
make-kpkg clean"
However, this command generated a bunch of errors saying this:
dpkg-architecture: failure: dpkg --print
"Mark Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for this! I increased the stack size via "ulimit -s "
> and the thick4 executable no longer crashes.
>
> However the curious thing is that with test.c, I thought "surely by
> increasing N I could make it seg fault too" but I can't, even
>
> #d
Peter Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The problem is: you're simply asking for too much stack space. On my
> machine, ulimit -s reports 8129 (that's in Kilobytes). When I write a
> seperate program such as:
>
> #include
>
> void main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> double a[209677];
>
I just compiled it with gcc 2.95 and it compiled
and ran fine..
very strange
xucaen
--- Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thought I'd found a gcc compiler error (and
> still may have). The
> following program crashes with a segmentation
> fault.
>
> #define N 209677
>
>
also sprach Mark Phillips (on Wed, 07 Mar 2001 03:18:56AM +1030):
> -rwxrwxr-x1 mark mark 4731 Mar 7 02:53 test*
> -rw-rw-r--1 mark mark 162 Mar 7 02:53 test.c
> -rwxrwxr-x1 mark mark 4733 Mar 7 02:53 thick4*
> -rw-r--r--1 mark mark
I don't think this is a GCC error because gcc compiles this program
successfully.
The problem is: you're simply asking for too much stack space. On my
machine, ulimit -s reports 8129 (that's in Kilobytes). When I write a
seperate program such as:
#include
void main(int argc, char **argv)
{
Hi,
I thought I'd found a gcc compiler error (and still may have). The
following program crashes with a segmentation fault.
#define N 209677
int main(int argv, char **argc) {
int
i;
double
a[N],
b[N],
c[N],
d[N],
e[N];
c[0]=0.0;
i=1;
c[i]=c[i-1];
}
If I make
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 06:52:51PM -0500, Francois Fayard wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/GTK/ESSAI$ gcc base.c -o base `gtk-config --cflags
> --libs`
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXi
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
you need xlibs-dev, but that's changed since potato, i think it was
xlib6g-de
Hi,
I'm trying to write a c program using GTK.
I'm very new to C.
When I compile the first program from the GTK Tutorial, I have :
/* example-start base base.c */
#include
int main( int argc,
char *argv[] )
{
GtkWidget *window;
gtk_init (&argc, &argv);
wind
33 matches
Mail list logo
